Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Wehkamp Retail GroupWehkamp Retail Group
VS
AcostaAcosta
Wehkamp Retail Group

Wehkamp Retail Group

Burgemeester Roelenweg, 13, Zwolle, Overijssel, NL, 8021EV

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
773/1000Fair

𝗪𝗲𝗵𝗸𝗮𝗺𝗽 & 𝗸𝗹𝗲𝗲𝗿𝘁𝗷𝗲𝘀.𝗰𝗼𝗺 We have been here for over 72 years for the Netherlands, for everyone, for families, and in every stage of life. Everyone knows us, and we know the Netherlands. We assist in making choices, provide a beautiful, relevant, and ...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:831
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Acosta

Acosta

6651 Gate Pkwy, Jacksonville, 32256, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.acosta.com
791/1000Fair

Acosta brings simplicity to retail sales. We act as a catalyst to boldly connect brands, retailers and consumers, fueling growth and building long-term value throughout North America and Europe. We are deeply embedded in every corner of the retail industry, strengtheni...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:13,177
Subsidiaries:26
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Wehkamp Retail Group

Wehkamp Retail Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Acosta

Acosta

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Wehkamp Retail Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Acosta in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Wehkamp Retail Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Wehkamp Retail Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Acosta (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Acosta cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Wehkamp Retail Group

Wehkamp Retail Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Acosta

Acosta

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Wehkamp Retail Group company and Acosta company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Wehkamp Retail Group company and Acosta company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Wehkamp Retail Group company and Acosta company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Wehkamp Retail Group company and Acosta company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Wehkamp Retail Group company and Acosta company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Wehkamp Retail Group company and Acosta company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Wehkamp Retail Group company and Acosta company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Wehkamp Retail Group company and Acosta company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Wehkamp Retail Group company and Acosta company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Wehkamp Retail Group company and Acosta company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Wehkamp Retail Group company and Acosta company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Wehkamp Retail Group and Acosta, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Wehkamp Retail Group and Acosta, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Wehkamp Retail Group or Acosta ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Wehkamp Retail Group or Acosta ?
Between Wehkamp Retail Group and Acosta, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Wehkamp Retail Group and Acosta, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2