Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Weatherford DirectWeatherford Direct
VS
ExxonMobilExxonMobil
Weatherford Direct

Weatherford Direct

2120-64 Ave, Edmonton, Alberta, T6P 1Z3, CA

Last Update: 01/11/2025

View Profile
749/1000Moderate

The wholesale division of Weatherford’s Cased-Hole Completion Services. We specialize in the distribution of genuine Weatherford downhole equipment to service companies across the globe.

NAICS:211
NAICS Definition:Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees:0
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
ExxonMobil

ExxonMobil

US

Last Update: 26/06/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.exxonmobil.com
826/1000Good

The need for energy is universal. That's why ExxonMobil scientists and engineers are pioneering new research and pursuing new technologies to reduce emissions while creating more efficient fuels. We're committed to responsibly meeting the world's energy needs. We aim...

NAICS:211
NAICS Definition:Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees:72,624
Subsidiaries:37
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Weatherford Direct

Weatherford Direct

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
ExxonMobil

ExxonMobil

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Weatherford Direct in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ExxonMobil in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Weatherford Direct (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Weatherford Direct cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - ExxonMobil (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ExxonMobil cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Weatherford Direct

Weatherford Direct

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
ExxonMobil

ExxonMobil

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
EXX000120924

FAQ

Between Weatherford Direct company and ExxonMobil company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Weatherford Direct company and ExxonMobil company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Weatherford Direct company and ExxonMobil company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Weatherford Direct company and ExxonMobil company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Weatherford Direct company and ExxonMobil company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Weatherford Direct company and ExxonMobil company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Weatherford Direct company and ExxonMobil company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Weatherford Direct company and ExxonMobil company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Weatherford Direct company and ExxonMobil company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Weatherford Direct company and ExxonMobil company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Weatherford Direct company and ExxonMobil company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Weatherford Direct and ExxonMobil, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Weatherford Direct and ExxonMobil, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Weatherford Direct or ExxonMobil ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Weatherford Direct or ExxonMobil ?
Between Weatherford Direct and ExxonMobil, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Weatherford Direct and ExxonMobil, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9