Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

U.S. District Court, Western District of TexasU.S. District Court, Western District of Texas
VS
State of IllinoisState of Illinois
U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas

U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas

727 E Cesar E Chavez Blvd, San Antonio, 78206, US

Last Update: 26/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.txwd.uscourts.gov
761/1000Fair

The United States Courts are an independent, national judiciary providing fair and impartial justice within the jurisdiction conferred by the Constitution and Congress. As an equal branch of government, the federal judiciary preserves and enhances its core values as th...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:114
Subsidiaries:28
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
State of Illinois

State of Illinois

US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://illinois.gov
819/1000Good

The government of Illinois, under the Constitution of Illinois, has three branches of government: executive, legislative and judicial. The executive branch is split into several statewide elected offices, with the Governor as chief executive, and has numerous department...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:11,299
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas

U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
State of Illinois

State of Illinois

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for State of Illinois in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas (X = Date, Y = Severity)

U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - State of Illinois (X = Date, Y = Severity)

State of Illinois cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas

U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
State of Illinois

State of Illinois

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
STA1767411522

FAQ

Between U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas company and State of Illinois company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas company and State of Illinois company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas company and State of Illinois company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas company and State of Illinois company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas company and State of Illinois company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas company and State of Illinois company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas company and State of Illinois company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas company and State of Illinois company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas company and State of Illinois company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas company and State of Illinois company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas company and State of Illinois company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas and State of Illinois, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas and State of Illinois, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas or State of Illinois ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas or State of Illinois ?
Between U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas and State of Illinois, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas and State of Illinois, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2