Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

W+D – Tissue & HygieneW+D – Tissue & Hygiene
VS
ANDRITZANDRITZ
W+D – Tissue & Hygiene

W+D – Tissue & Hygiene

Sohler Weg 65, Neuwied, 56564, DE

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
742/1000Moderate

BW Converting manufactures machinery for converting and precise processing of thin and inhomogeneous materials at high production speeds, such as baby diapers and pants, feminine hygiene, light incontinence products, adult diapers and pants and underpads under the banne...

NAICS:333
NAICS Definition:Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:9
Subsidiaries:34
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
ANDRITZ

ANDRITZ

Stattegger Strasse 18, Graz, 8045, AT

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.andritz.com
767/1000Fair

ANDRITZ is an international technology group based in Austria. The company offers a broad portfolio of innovative plants, equipment, systems, services and digital solutions for a wide range of industries and end markets. Sustainability is an integral part of the compa...

NAICS:333
NAICS Definition:Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:14,553
Subsidiaries:14
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
W+D – Tissue & Hygiene

W+D – Tissue & Hygiene

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
ANDRITZ

ANDRITZ

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for W+D – Tissue & Hygiene in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ANDRITZ in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - W+D – Tissue & Hygiene (X = Date, Y = Severity)

W+D – Tissue & Hygiene cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - ANDRITZ (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ANDRITZ cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
W+D – Tissue & Hygiene

W+D – Tissue & Hygiene

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
ANDRITZ

ANDRITZ

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between W+D – Tissue & Hygiene company and ANDRITZ company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between W+D – Tissue & Hygiene company and ANDRITZ company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between W+D – Tissue & Hygiene company and ANDRITZ company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between W+D – Tissue & Hygiene company and ANDRITZ company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between W+D – Tissue & Hygiene company and ANDRITZ company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between W+D – Tissue & Hygiene company and ANDRITZ company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between W+D – Tissue & Hygiene company and ANDRITZ company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between W+D – Tissue & Hygiene company and ANDRITZ company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between W+D – Tissue & Hygiene company and ANDRITZ company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between W+D – Tissue & Hygiene company and ANDRITZ company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between W+D – Tissue & Hygiene company and ANDRITZ company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between W+D – Tissue & Hygiene and ANDRITZ, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between W+D – Tissue & Hygiene and ANDRITZ, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - W+D – Tissue & Hygiene or ANDRITZ ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - W+D – Tissue & Hygiene or ANDRITZ ?
Between W+D – Tissue & Hygiene and ANDRITZ, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between W+D – Tissue & Hygiene and ANDRITZ, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA