Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

WC SmithWC Smith
VS
Coldwell Banker RealtyColdwell Banker Realty
WC Smith

WC Smith

1100 New Jersey Ave SE, Washington, 20003, US

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.wcsmith.com
708/1000Moderate

WC Smith is a Washington, DC -- based multidisciplinary real estate firm. The company has provided integrated real estate services to the Washington metropolitan area for more than five decades. In complement to its development, construction, sales and financial divisio...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:162
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Coldwell Banker Realty

Coldwell Banker Realty

175 Park Avenue, Madison, NJ, US, 07940

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
788/1000Fair

Coldwell Banker Realty is one of the nation’s largest real estate brokerages operating in 50 markets in the United States. Powered by a network of approximately 55,000 independent real estate agents and 600 offices, Coldwell Banker Realty, a subsidiary of Anywhere Real ...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:44,752
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
WC Smith

WC Smith

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Coldwell Banker Realty

Coldwell Banker Realty

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for WC Smith in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Coldwell Banker Realty in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - WC Smith (X = Date, Y = Severity)

WC Smith cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Coldwell Banker Realty (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Coldwell Banker Realty cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
WC Smith

WC Smith

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
WC-1768343853
Coldwell Banker Realty

Coldwell Banker Realty

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between WC Smith company and Coldwell Banker Realty company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between WC Smith company and Coldwell Banker Realty company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between WC Smith company and Coldwell Banker Realty company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between WC Smith company and Coldwell Banker Realty company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between WC Smith company and Coldwell Banker Realty company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between WC Smith company and Coldwell Banker Realty company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between WC Smith company and Coldwell Banker Realty company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between WC Smith company and Coldwell Banker Realty company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between WC Smith company and Coldwell Banker Realty company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between WC Smith company and Coldwell Banker Realty company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between WC Smith company and Coldwell Banker Realty company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between WC Smith and Coldwell Banker Realty, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between WC Smith and Coldwell Banker Realty, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - WC Smith or Coldwell Banker Realty ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - WC Smith or Coldwell Banker Realty ?
Between WC Smith and Coldwell Banker Realty, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between WC Smith and Coldwell Banker Realty, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA