Comparison Overview
Waves Telecom & Technology

Waves Telecom & Technology
Dammam Street, Al Khubar Al Janubiyah, SA
Last Update: 14/09/2026
Waves Telecom & Technology Est. is a leading company exclusively focused on Cyber Security, SACS-002 Third Party Cybersecurity Standard, Data center IT services, Internet Service provider solutions, cloud computing, and telecommunications services. The company offers sp...

Eviden
Bezons, 95870, FR
Last Update: 13/09/2026
About Eviden : Eviden is the Atos Group brand focused on cybersecurity products, mission-critical systems and vision AI. A trusted partner to public and private sector organizations, Eviden deploys advanced analytics capabilities and helps ensure the robustness, continu...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Waves Telecom & Technology







Eviden






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
Waves Telecom & Technology has 31.97% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Eviden in 2026.
Incident History - Waves Telecom & Technology (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Waves Telecom & Technology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Eviden (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Eviden cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Waves Telecom & Technology

Eviden
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.
Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.
A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.
Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.