Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Waves Telecom & TechnologyWaves Telecom & Technology
VS
ASGN IncorporatedASGN Incorporated
Waves Telecom & Technology

Waves Telecom & Technology

Dammam Street, Al Khubar Al Janubiyah, SA

Last Update: 14/09/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.wavestelecom.net
687/1000Weak

Waves Telecom & Technology Est. is a leading company exclusively focused on Cyber Security, SACS-002 Third Party Cybersecurity Standard, Data center IT services, Internet Service provider solutions, cloud computing, and telecommunications services. The company offers sp...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:20
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
ASGN Incorporated

ASGN Incorporated

4400 Cox Road Suite 100, Glen Allen, Virginia, US, 23060

Last Update: 17/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://asgn.com
753/1000Fair

ASGN Incorporated (NYSE: ASGN) is a leading provider of IT services and solutions across the commercial and government sectors. ASGN helps corporate enterprises and government organizations develop, implement and operate critical IT and business solutions through its in...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:20,398
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Waves Telecom & Technology

Waves Telecom & Technology

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
ASGN Incorporated

ASGN Incorporated

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

Waves Telecom & Technology has 31.97% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ASGN Incorporated in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Waves Telecom & Technology (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Waves Telecom & Technology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - ASGN Incorporated (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ASGN Incorporated cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Waves Telecom & Technology

Waves Telecom & Technology

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
WAVCEL1789374433
ASGN Incorporated

ASGN Incorporated

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Waves Telecom & Technology company and ASGN Incorporated company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Waves Telecom & Technology company and ASGN Incorporated company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Waves Telecom & Technology company and ASGN Incorporated company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Waves Telecom & Technology company and ASGN Incorporated company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Waves Telecom & Technology company and ASGN Incorporated company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Waves Telecom & Technology company and ASGN Incorporated company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Waves Telecom & Technology company and ASGN Incorporated company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Waves Telecom & Technology company and ASGN Incorporated company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Waves Telecom & Technology company and ASGN Incorporated company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Waves Telecom & Technology company and ASGN Incorporated company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Waves Telecom & Technology company and ASGN Incorporated company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Waves Telecom & Technology and ASGN Incorporated, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Waves Telecom & Technology and ASGN Incorporated, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Waves Telecom & Technology or ASGN Incorporated ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Waves Telecom & Technology or ASGN Incorporated ?
Between Waves Telecom & Technology and ASGN Incorporated, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Waves Telecom & Technology and ASGN Incorporated, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-105761
SUMMARY

Dify is an open-source LLM app development platform. Prior to 1.16.0, the PUT /console/api/apps/<app_id>/server endpoint in api/controllers/console/app/mcp_server.py used AppMCPServerController.put() to retrieve an AppMCPServer by the client-supplied server ID without verifying that the server belonged to the requested application and tenant. An authenticated workspace member could therefore change another application's MCP server status and parameters, potentially redirecting data or disabling the service. This issue is fixed in version 1.16.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-05
UPDATED
Date2026-10-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-105760
SUMMARY

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models. Prior to 0.30.0, a caller can use the request-level media_io_kwargs field to select the GLMGA video backend and supply large values for the fps and max_frames options without a strict work ceiling. GLMGA constructs and deduplicates an attacker-sized pre-decode frame-index list, allowing a compact request and tiny valid video to consume disproportionate CPU time and memory in the shared media-loading executor. This issue is fixed in version 0.30.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-05
UPDATED
Date2026-10-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-105759
SUMMARY

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models. Prior to 0.30.0, the Rust frontend's track_http_metrics middleware records the raw HTTP method token as a Prometheus label for requests reaching registered routes. An unauthenticated attacker can send unique arbitrary method tokens to unguarded routes such as /tokenize, causing Prometheus's Family::get_or_create function to permanently create counter and histogram label sets. Those label sets increase process memory usage and enlarge the /metrics response until the service or monitoring path is exhausted. This issue is fixed in version 0.30.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-05
UPDATED
Date2026-10-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-105758
SUMMARY

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models. From 0.24.0 until 0.30.0, the Qwen2VLVideoBackend and Qwen3VLVideoBackend classes accept request-level values for the media_io_kwargs.video.max_frames and media_io_kwargs.video.fps fields without enforcing server-side ceilings. An unauthenticated caller can submit these values to the /tokenize endpoint, causing the sampler to decode every frame selected from attacker-controlled video input, consume disproportionate frontend memory, and potentially terminate the API process before scheduling or admission control. The Rust frontend is not affected because it rejects the media_io_kwargs field. This issue is fixed in version 0.30.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-05
UPDATED
Date2026-10-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-105757
SUMMARY

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models. Prior to 0.30.0, structured-output request failures can escape request-scoped validation and reach the EngineCore fatal-error path. A per-request backend mismatch can re-raise a grammar compilation exception, padding produced by the ngram_gpu speculative-decoding mode can pass a negative token to guidance validation, and the Rust frontend can admit empty structured-output values that the Python frontend rejects, allowing ordinary constrained-generation requests to terminate the shared engine. This issue is fixed in version 0.30.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-05
UPDATED
Date2026-10-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8