Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Watsons TaiwanWatsons Taiwan
VS
Azadea GroupAzadea Group
Watsons Taiwan

Watsons Taiwan

11F.-1, No. 760, Sec. 4, Bade Rd., Songshan Dist., Taipei City, Taipei, 105, TW

Last Update: 21/03/2026

View Profile
770/1000Fair

About AS Watson Group Watsons Taiwan is part of AS Watson Group, the world’s largest international health and beauty retailer operating over 17,000 stores under 12 retail brands in 30 markets, with over 130,000 employees worldwide. In the fiscal year 2024, AS Watson Gr...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:211
Subsidiaries:28
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Azadea Group

Azadea Group

P1 & P2, O14 Tower, Abraj Street, Business Bay, Dubai, 22700, AE

Last Update: 15/09/2026

View Profile
811/1000Good

AZADEA Group is a premier lifestyle retail company that owns and operates more than 40+ leading international franchise concepts across the Middle East and Africa. With over 13,500 employees, dedicated offices in every market it operates, and world-class infrastructure,...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:14,126
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Watsons Taiwan

Watsons Taiwan

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Azadea Group

Azadea Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Watsons Taiwan in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Azadea Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Watsons Taiwan (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Watsons Taiwan cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Azadea Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Azadea Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Watsons Taiwan

Watsons Taiwan

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Azadea Group

Azadea Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Watsons Taiwan company and Azadea Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Watsons Taiwan company and Azadea Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Watsons Taiwan company and Azadea Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Watsons Taiwan company and Azadea Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Watsons Taiwan company and Azadea Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Watsons Taiwan company and Azadea Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Watsons Taiwan company and Azadea Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Watsons Taiwan company and Azadea Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Watsons Taiwan company and Azadea Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Watsons Taiwan company and Azadea Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Watsons Taiwan company and Azadea Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Watsons Taiwan and Azadea Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Watsons Taiwan and Azadea Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Watsons Taiwan or Azadea Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Watsons Taiwan or Azadea Group ?
Between Watsons Taiwan and Azadea Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Watsons Taiwan and Azadea Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89096
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in nfs-utils. An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending repeated state notification requests to an exposed rpc.statd service. The service fails to properly release memory allocated during callback processing, leading to continuous memory growth. Sustained requests can exhaust system resources, eventually causing the service to degrade or crash.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-89088
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow exists in libparted's file system resizing logic when handling FAT16 volumes. By convincing a user or administrator to resize a specially crafted FAT16 file system image with malformed directory metadata, an attacker can trigger an oversized read into a fixed-size memory buffer. This issue causes memory corruption, resulting in an application crash and a denial of service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-89085
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow can occur when processing a specially crafted FAT32 filesystem due to an integer calculation error during buffer allocation. A local attacker could exploit this by enticing a user or automated service to open a malicious filesystem image, resulting in an application crash leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential memory corruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-17591
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libarchive. An attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential information disclosure due to a use-after-free vulnerability, which occurs when a program reads memory that has already been released. This issue arises when the archive_entry_copy_mac_metadata() function deallocates an internal buffer before completing a data copy. An attacker who can supply input to an application utilizing this function can trigger the flaw to crash the application or read uninitialized memory data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-111802
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Nautilus. When a removable drive or disk image is unmounted or ejected, Nautilus prompts the user to empty the trash without verifying whether the trash directory paths are symbolic links. An attacker can exploit this flaw by tricking a user into mounting a crafted storage volume and confirming the prompt to empty the trash, leading to the arbitrary deletion of files accessible to that user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.3