Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Waterloo BrewingWaterloo Brewing
VS
A. O. Smith CorporationA. O. Smith Corporation
Waterloo Brewing

Waterloo Brewing

400 Bingemans Centre Drive, Kitchener, N2B 3X9, CA

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://waterloobrewing.com/
736/1000Moderate

Founded in 1984, Waterloo Brewing was the first craft brewery to start up in Ontario and is credited with pioneering the present-day craft brewing renaissance in Canada. Waterloo Brewing has complemented its Waterloo premium beers with the popular Laker brand. In 2011, ...

NAICS:30
NAICS Definition:Manufacturing
Employees:89
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
A. O. Smith Corporation

A. O. Smith Corporation

11270 W. Park Place, Milwaukee, WI, US, 53224

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.aosmith.com
780/1000Fair

Celebrating its 150th year of business, A. O. Smith is a leading global water technology and manufacturing company that proudly employs more than 12,000 people who together provide water heating and water treatment solutions. The company is headquartered in Milwaukee,...

NAICS:30
NAICS Definition:Manufacturing
Employees:13,956
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Waterloo Brewing

Waterloo Brewing

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
A. O. Smith Corporation

A. O. Smith Corporation

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Waterloo Brewing in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for A. O. Smith Corporation in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Waterloo Brewing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Waterloo Brewing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - A. O. Smith Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

A. O. Smith Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Waterloo Brewing

Waterloo Brewing

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
WAT213271122
A. O. Smith Corporation

A. O. Smith Corporation

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Waterloo Brewing company and A. O. Smith Corporation company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Waterloo Brewing company and A. O. Smith Corporation company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Waterloo Brewing company and A. O. Smith Corporation company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Waterloo Brewing company and A. O. Smith Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Waterloo Brewing company and A. O. Smith Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Waterloo Brewing company and A. O. Smith Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Waterloo Brewing company and A. O. Smith Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Waterloo Brewing company and A. O. Smith Corporation company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Waterloo Brewing company and A. O. Smith Corporation company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Waterloo Brewing company and A. O. Smith Corporation company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Waterloo Brewing company and A. O. Smith Corporation company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Waterloo Brewing and A. O. Smith Corporation, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Waterloo Brewing and A. O. Smith Corporation, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Waterloo Brewing or A. O. Smith Corporation ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Waterloo Brewing or A. O. Smith Corporation ?
Between Waterloo Brewing and A. O. Smith Corporation, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Waterloo Brewing and A. O. Smith Corporation, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1