Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Waterloo Centre for AstrophysicsWaterloo Centre for Astrophysics
VS
Rutgers UniversityRutgers University
Waterloo Centre for Astrophysics

Waterloo Centre for Astrophysics

200 University Ave W, Waterloo, CA

Last Update: 27/11/2025

View Profile
770/1000Fair

... where the Universe is our laboratory

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:21
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Rutgers University

Rutgers University

57 US Highway 1, New Brunswick, 08901, US

Last Update: 24/06/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.rutgers.edu
680/1000Weak

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, stands among America’s highest-ranked, most diverse public research universities. The oldest, largest, and top-ranked public university in the New York/New Jersey metropolitan area, you’ll find us at our main locations in thr...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:18,275
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
3
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Waterloo Centre for Astrophysics

Waterloo Centre for Astrophysics

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Rutgers University

Rutgers University

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Waterloo Centre for Astrophysics in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

Rutgers University has 183.02% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Waterloo Centre for Astrophysics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Waterloo Centre for Astrophysics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Rutgers University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rutgers University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Waterloo Centre for Astrophysics

Waterloo Centre for Astrophysics

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Rutgers University

Rutgers University

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
INSRUTUDEHARCOL1782312004
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
THEYALRUTHARSTAINSPRI1778258906
🔒 Incident : Breach
MCGVERHARUDE1777034314

FAQ

Between Waterloo Centre for Astrophysics company and Rutgers University company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Waterloo Centre for Astrophysics company and Rutgers University company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Waterloo Centre for Astrophysics company and Rutgers University company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Waterloo Centre for Astrophysics company and Rutgers University company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Waterloo Centre for Astrophysics company and Rutgers University company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Waterloo Centre for Astrophysics company and Rutgers University company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Waterloo Centre for Astrophysics company and Rutgers University company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Waterloo Centre for Astrophysics company and Rutgers University company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Waterloo Centre for Astrophysics company and Rutgers University company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Waterloo Centre for Astrophysics company and Rutgers University company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Waterloo Centre for Astrophysics company and Rutgers University company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Waterloo Centre for Astrophysics and Rutgers University, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Waterloo Centre for Astrophysics and Rutgers University, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Waterloo Centre for Astrophysics or Rutgers University ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Waterloo Centre for Astrophysics or Rutgers University ?
Between Waterloo Centre for Astrophysics and Rutgers University, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Waterloo Centre for Astrophysics and Rutgers University, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA