Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Wasserman DigitalWasserman Digital
VS
SLBSLB
Wasserman Digital

Wasserman Digital

54 Canal Street, Boston, 02114, US

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
765/1000Fair

Wasserman Digital is a department of Wasserman, a leading global, end-to-end marketing and management business serving talent, brands and properties. We have deep expertise in the strategy, planning, designing, development and management of websites, e-commerce sites,...

NAICS:513
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:19
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
SLB

SLB

5599 San Felipe St, Houston, Texas, US, 77056

Last Update: 21/07/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.slb.com
839/1000Good

SLB is a global technology company that has driven energy innovation for more than a century. With a global footprint in more than 100 countries and employees representing almost twice as many nationalities, we work each day on innovating oil and gas, delivering digital...

NAICS:513
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:81,376
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Wasserman Digital

Wasserman Digital

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
SLB

SLB

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Wasserman Digital in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SLB in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Wasserman Digital (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Wasserman Digital cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - SLB (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SLB cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Wasserman Digital

Wasserman Digital

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
SLB

SLB

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Wasserman Digital company and SLB company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Wasserman Digital company and SLB company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Wasserman Digital company and SLB company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Wasserman Digital company and SLB company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Wasserman Digital company and SLB company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Wasserman Digital company and SLB company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Wasserman Digital company and SLB company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Wasserman Digital company and SLB company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Wasserman Digital company and SLB company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Wasserman Digital company and SLB company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Wasserman Digital company and SLB company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Wasserman Digital and SLB, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Wasserman Digital and SLB, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Wasserman Digital or SLB ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Wasserman Digital or SLB ?
Between Wasserman Digital and SLB, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Wasserman Digital and SLB, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-86150
SUMMARY

A security vulnerability has been detected in Tenda CP3 27.5.57.101. Impacted is an unknown function of the file custom-x/softap/hostapd. Such manipulation of the argument wpa_passphrase leads to hard-coded credentials. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-05
UPDATED
Date2026-09-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.1)
CVSS2
Base Score: 3.3
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:P/I:N/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-86149
SUMMARY

A weakness has been identified in Tenda CP3 27.5.57.101. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file Net/NetCheckPing.cpp. This manipulation of the argument interface_name/host causes os command injection. The attack can be initiated remotely.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-05
UPDATED
Date2026-09-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS2
Base Score: 8.3
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:C/I:C/A:C
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-86148
SUMMARY

A security flaw has been discovered in Tenda CP3 27.5.57.101. This vulnerability affects the function SystemAsh of the file Apis/system.c of the component Kylin. The manipulation of the argument AlarmVoiceURL results in os command injection. It is possible to launch the attack remotely.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-05
UPDATED
Date2026-09-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS2
Base Score: 8.3
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:C/I:C/A:C
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-86206
SUMMARY

A vulnerability in the N-central internal API access control filter allows unauthorised access to internal APIs. This is fixed in N-central 2026.3 HF3 and 2026.4

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-05
UPDATED
Date2026-09-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86060
SUMMARY

RouterOS contains an argument-handling flaw in the SSH login path involving usernames that begin with a prohibited character, allowing for the trusted RouterOS policy mask to be changed, leading to privilege escalation. Exploitation requires an unauthenticated SSH session to reach the RouterOS login helper.This issue was fixed in versions: 6.49.21 (Long-term), 7.23.4 (Long-term) and 7.24.2 (Stable)

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-05
UPDATED
Date2026-09-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA