Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Washtenaw CountyWashtenaw County
VS
U.S. Department of the TreasuryU.S. Department of the Treasury
Washtenaw County

Washtenaw County

220 N Main St, Ann Arbor, 48104, US

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.washtenaw.org
764/1000Fair

Washtenaw County is a local government agency located in southeast Michigan, covering an area of 720 square miles. Its 27 cities, villages and townships are home to about 354,000 citizens in urban, suburban, and rural settings. This mix of different settings provides ma...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:1,124
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
U.S. Department of the Treasury

U.S. Department of the Treasury

1500 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Washington, 20005, US

Last Update: 25/08/2026

View Profile
418/1000Critical

The Treasury Department is the executive agency responsible for promoting economic prosperity and ensuring the financial security of the United States. The Department is responsible for a wide range of activities such as advising the President on economic and financial ...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:14,483
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
5
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Washtenaw County

Washtenaw County

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
U.S. Department of the Treasury

U.S. Department of the Treasury

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Washtenaw County in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

U.S. Department of the Treasury has 96.08% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Washtenaw County (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Washtenaw County cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - U.S. Department of the Treasury (X = Date, Y = Severity)

U.S. Department of the Treasury cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Washtenaw County

Washtenaw County

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
WAS201921622
U.S. Department of the Treasury

U.S. Department of the Treasury

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
US-CIS1784060682
🔒 Incident : Breach
FBIOFFUS-CEN1787682734
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
US-526082425

FAQ

Between Washtenaw County company and U.S. Department of the Treasury company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Washtenaw County company and U.S. Department of the Treasury company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Washtenaw County company and U.S. Department of the Treasury company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Washtenaw County company and U.S. Department of the Treasury company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Washtenaw County company and U.S. Department of the Treasury company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Washtenaw County company and U.S. Department of the Treasury company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Washtenaw County company and U.S. Department of the Treasury company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Washtenaw County company and U.S. Department of the Treasury company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Washtenaw County company and U.S. Department of the Treasury company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Washtenaw County company and U.S. Department of the Treasury company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Washtenaw County company and U.S. Department of the Treasury company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Washtenaw County and U.S. Department of the Treasury, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Washtenaw County and U.S. Department of the Treasury, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Washtenaw County or U.S. Department of the Treasury ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Washtenaw County or U.S. Department of the Treasury ?
Between Washtenaw County and U.S. Department of the Treasury, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Washtenaw County and U.S. Department of the Treasury, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-103591
SUMMARY

DeepWiki-Open through commit d92819a contains an unauthenticated arbitrary file read vulnerability in the GET /codemap/file endpoint via the repo_url parameter. Attackers can supply a non-URL repo_url value to bypass path containment checks and read any file accessible to the API process by specifying absolute file paths.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-30
UPDATED
Date2026-09-30
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-103590
SUMMARY

QloApps through 1.7.0 contains a reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability in the back-office room type editor's length of stay fields. Attackers can induce authenticated administrators to submit crafted POST requests with malicious payloads in restriction_min_los and restriction_max_los parameters, executing arbitrary JavaScript in the victim's administrative session.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-30
UPDATED
Date2026-09-30
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-103589
SUMMARY

QloApps through 1.7.0 contains a reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability in the back-office room type editor that fails to escape room_num, floor, and comment field values in input attributes. Attackers can induce authenticated back-office users to submit crafted POST requests with malicious payloads to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the victim's administrative session.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-30
UPDATED
Date2026-09-30
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-103588
SUMMARY

QloApps through 1.7.0 contains a reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability in the exceptions field of the back-office Transplant a module form. Attackers can craft a malicious link containing JavaScript payload in the exceptions parameter that executes in an authenticated administrator's session when the victim follows the link.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-30
UPDATED
Date2026-09-30
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-103587
SUMMARY

QloApps through 1.7.0 contains a reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability in the back-office Hotel Reservation System Book Now search, where date_to and id_room_type parameters are copied into template variables without validation. Attackers can craft a malicious link containing JavaScript payload in these parameters that executes in an authenticated administrator's session when the victim follows the link.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-30
UPDATED
Date2026-09-30
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3