WP
Company Details
Linkedin ID:
washingtonpost
Website:
Employees number:
3,708
Number of followers:
1,610,969
NAICS:
51111
Industry Type:
Homepage:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/
IP Addresses:
0
Company ID:
THE_1363211
Scan Status:
In-progress
The Washington Post Company CyberSecurity Posture
http://www.washingtonpost.com/
The Washington Post is an award-winning news leader whose mission is to connect, inform, and enlighten local, national and global readers with trustworthy reporting, in-depth analysis and engaging opinions. The Post is as much a tech company as it is a media company, combining world-class journalism with the latest technology and tools so readers can interact with The Post anytime, anywhere. Our approach is always the same– shape ideas, redefine speed, take ownership and lead. Every employee, every project, every day.
The Washington Post A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
WP Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 0 and 549
WP
Updated:
- Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
- Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
WP Global Score (TPRM)XXXX
WP
- Instant access to detailed risk factors
- Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
- Vulnerabilities
- Findings
WP Company CyberSecurity News & History
Past Incidents
5
Attack Types
3
The Washington Post
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks
Description: The Washington Post experienced a significant **data breach** in July 2025, which remained undetected for **3.5 months** until October 27, 2025. The breach targeted its **Oracle E-Suite infrastructure**, compromising the personal data of **9,720 employees and contractors**, including names, personal identifiers, and other sensitive information. The exposed records pose risks of **identity theft, fraud, and dark web exploitation**, prompting the company to offer **12 months of complimentary identity protection services (IDX)** to affected individuals. The delayed detection raises concerns about the organization’s **security monitoring and incident response capabilities**, particularly given the scale of the breach and the sensitivity of the exposed employee data. External hackers exploited vulnerabilities in the enterprise system, highlighting persistent risks in **ERP platforms** and the broader threat landscape for media organizations managing large volumes of personnel data.
The Washington Post
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks
Description: The Washington Post, a major U.S. daily newspaper with ~2.5M digital subscribers, suffered a data breach via a zero-day vulnerability (CVE-2025-61884) in Oracle E-Business Suite between **July 10–August 22, 2025**. Threat actors (linked to the **Clop ransomware group**) exploited the flaw to access the Post’s internal ERP system, stealing sensitive **employee and contractor data**—including **full names, bank account/routing numbers, Social Security numbers (SSNs), and tax/ID numbers**—affecting **9,720 individuals**. The attackers later attempted extortion in late September. While the breach was contained to internal HR/finance systems, the exposed data poses severe risks of **identity theft, financial fraud, and reputational harm**. Victims were offered 12 months of free identity protection (IDX) and advised to freeze credit files. The incident follows a separate June 2025 attack on journalists’ emails by state actors, though no direct link was confirmed.
The Washington Post
Cyber Attack
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks
Description: The Washington Post experienced a sophisticated cyberattack targeting the email accounts of journalists covering national security and economic policy, particularly those with expertise in China-related matters. The attackers gained unauthorized access to Microsoft email credentials, potentially exposing sensitive correspondence with government officials, policy experts, and international contacts. The breach was detected during routine security monitoring, and immediate containment protocols were initiated. A forensic investigation is ongoing to determine the full extent of data accessed and the methods used by the attackers. The attack suggests advanced operational planning and detailed reconnaissance of the organization's structure.
The Washington Post
Ransomware
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks
Description: The Washington Post, a prominent American news organization, suffered a data breach caused by an exploited vulnerability in Oracle’s E-Business Suite software. The ransomware group **CL0P** gained unauthorized access between **July 10, 2025, and August 22, 2025**, compromising sensitive personal and financial data of **9,720 current and former employees and contractors**. Exposed information included **names, Social Security numbers, tax ID numbers, bank account numbers, and routing numbers**.The breach was discovered on **September 29, 2025**, after a threat actor contacted the company. Forensic investigations confirmed the exploit, revealing the vulnerability was widespread among Oracle clients. The Washington Post applied patches, notified affected individuals via mail starting **November 12, 2025**, and disclosed the incident to the **Maine, Massachusetts, and Vermont Attorney Generals' offices**. As a remedial measure, the company offered **24 months of free IDX identity protection services** to impacted individuals.
The Washington Post
Ransomware
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence
Description: The Washington Post confirmed it was a victim of a **data breach orchestrated by the Clop ransomware gang**, exploiting vulnerabilities in **Oracle’s E-Business Suite**—a widely used enterprise software. The attack was part of a **large-scale supply-chain campaign** targeting hundreds of organizations globally, leveraging zero-day flaws in Oracle’s platform. While specifics of the compromised data remain undisclosed, the breach likely exposed **internal financial or operational records**, given the suite’s role in business-critical processes. The incident aligns with Clop’s history of high-profile ransomware attacks, including the 2023 **MOVEit breach**, and follows a March 2025 Oracle Cloud hack where **6 million records were exfiltrated**. The Washington Post acknowledged the intrusion in a public statement, linking it to the broader Oracle exploitation wave. Industry experts warn of **ongoing risks** due to unpatched vulnerabilities in enterprise software, with Clop’s tactics combining **data exfiltration, ransom demands, and dark-web data sales**. The breach underscores systemic weaknesses in **third-party supply-chain security**, prompting calls for stricter vendor oversight and proactive patch management.
WP Company Scoring based on AI Models
Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
Underwriter Stats for WP
Incidents vs Newspaper Publishing Industry Average (This Year)
The Washington Post has 1112.12% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)
The Washington Post has 525.0% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident Types WP vs Newspaper Publishing Industry Avg (This Year)
The Washington Post reported 4 incidents this year: 1 cyber attacks, 1 ransomware, 0 vulnerabilities, 2 data breaches, compared to industry peers with at least 1 incident.
Incident History — WP (X = Date, Y = Severity)
WP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
WP Company Subsidiaries
The Washington Post is an award-winning news leader whose mission is to connect, inform, and enlighten local, national and global readers with trustworthy reporting, in-depth analysis and engaging opinions. The Post is as much a tech company as it is a media company, combining world-class journalism with the latest technology and tools so readers can interact with The Post anytime, anywhere. Our approach is always the same– shape ideas, redefine speed, take ownership and lead. Every employee, every project, every day.
Loading...
WP Similar Companies
Winner of 37 Pulitzer Prizes for outstanding journalism, The Wall Street Journal includes coverage of U.S. and world news, politics, arts, culture, lifestyle, sports, health and more. It's a critical resource of curated content in print, online and mobile apps, complete with breaking news streams, i
.png)
WP CyberSecurity News
November 18, 2025 11:08 PM
Cloudflare outage briefly disrupts ChatGPT, X and dozens of apps
The cybersecurity company is used across a wide array of apps, websites and other platforms.
November 07, 2025 08:00 AM
Washington Post confirms data breach linked to Oracle hacks
The Washington Post is the latest victim of a hacking campaign by the notorious Clop ransomware gang, which relied on vulnerabilities in...
November 07, 2025 08:00 AM
US Congressional Budget Office hit by cybersecurity incident
The U.S. Congressional Budget Office said on Thursday it had identified a security incident and acted to contain the breach at the...
November 07, 2025 08:00 AM
Washington Post hit by Clop ransomware in Oracle breach
Washington Post confirms breach in Oracle E-Business Suite platform attack by Clop ransomware gang. □. Campaign has affected 100+ companies...
November 06, 2025 08:00 AM
Congressional Budget Office had a cyber ‘security incident’ - Live Updates
The Washington Post reported the budget office may have been hacked by a foreign actor.
October 30, 2025 07:00 AM
US government is getting closer to banning TP-Link routers
The commerce department is considering a ban on TP-Link routers and other products.
October 02, 2025 07:01 PM
Shutdown guts U.S. cybersecurity agency at perilous time
The lead U.S. agency for protecting the electric grid, water supply and other critical services from hacking has furloughed most of its already trimmed-down...
October 02, 2025 07:00 AM
Shutdown guts U.S. cybersecurity agency at perilous time
“CISA remains fully committed to safeguarding the nation's critical infrastructure,” agency spokeswoman Marci McCarthy wrote in an emailed...
September 20, 2025 07:00 AM
Artificial intelligence ushers in a golden age of hacking, experts say
Hackers are using AI's immense capabilities to find ways into more networks -- and turn their victims' AI against them.
Frequently Asked Questions
Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.
WP CyberSecurity History Information
Official Website of The Washington Post
The official website of The Washington Post is http://www.washingtonpost.com/.
The Washington Post’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score
According to Rankiteo, The Washington Post’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 493, reflecting their Critical security posture.
How many security badges does The Washington Post’ have ?
According to Rankiteo, The Washington Post currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.
Does The Washington Post have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, The Washington Post is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.
Does The Washington Post have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, The Washington Post does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
Does The Washington Post comply with GDPR ?
According to Rankiteo, The Washington Post is not listed as GDPR compliant.
Does The Washington Post have PCI DSS certification ?
According to Rankiteo, The Washington Post does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.
Does The Washington Post comply with HIPAA ?
According to Rankiteo, The Washington Post is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.
Does The Washington Post have ISO 27001 certification ?
According to Rankiteo,The Washington Post is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.
Industry Classification of The Washington Post
The Washington Post operates primarily in the Newspaper Publishing industry.
Number of Employees at The Washington Post
The Washington Post employs approximately 3,708 people worldwide.
Subsidiaries Owned by The Washington Post
The Washington Post presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.
The Washington Post’s LinkedIn Followers
The Washington Post’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 1,610,969 followers.
NAICS Classification of The Washington Post
The Washington Post is classified under the NAICS code 51111, which corresponds to Newspaper Publishers.
The Washington Post’s Presence on Crunchbase
No, The Washington Post does not have a profile on Crunchbase.
The Washington Post’s Presence on LinkedIn
Yes, The Washington Post maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/washingtonpost.
Cybersecurity Incidents Involving The Washington Post
As of December 04, 2025, Rankiteo reports that The Washington Post has experienced 5 cybersecurity incidents.
Number of Peer and Competitor Companies
The Washington Post has an estimated 1,982 peer or competitor companies worldwide.
What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at The Washington Post ?
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Ransomware, Cyber Attack and Breach.
How does The Washington Post detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an incident response plan activated with yes, and third party assistance with yes, and containment measures with mandatory password reset, containment measures with organization-wide security measures, and communication strategy with memorandum to affected staff, and incident response plan activated with acknowledged in public statement (reuters, techcrunch), and communication strategy with public statement via media outlets (reuters, techcrunch), and and and remediation measures with investigation with external experts, remediation measures with collaboration with oracle, and recovery measures with 12-month free identity protection (idx) for affected individuals, recovery measures with recommendations for credit freezes and fraud alerts, and communication strategy with notification letters to affected individuals, communication strategy with public disclosure, and and third party assistance with forensic experts, and containment measures with applied patches for oracle e-business suite vulnerability, and communication strategy with notification letters mailed to affected individuals (starting 2025-11-12), communication strategy with disclosure to state attorney generals' offices (maine, massachusetts, vermont), and and third party assistance with zwillgen pllc (privacy and data security law firm), third party assistance with idx (identity protection services), and recovery measures with 12 months of complimentary identity protection services (credit monitoring, dark web surveillance, identity theft recovery assistance), and communication strategy with written notifications sent to affected individuals on 2025-11-12; breach notification filed with maine regulators..
Incident Details
Can you provide details on each incident ?
Title: Cyberattack on The Washington Post
Description: The Washington Post is investigating a sophisticated cyberattack that compromised the email accounts of multiple journalists, with evidence suggesting the involvement of a foreign government.
Date Detected: Thursday
Type: Cyber Espionage
Attack Vector: Compromised Microsoft credentials
Threat Actor: Foreign GovernmentPotentially China
Motivation: Intelligence gathering on national security and economic policy issues
Title: Washington Post Data Breach Linked to Clop Ransomware Exploiting Oracle E-Business Suite Vulnerabilities
Description: The Washington Post confirmed it fell victim to a data breach orchestrated by the Clop ransomware gang, which exploited vulnerabilities in Oracle’s E-Business Suite software. This incident is part of a broader campaign targeting hundreds of organizations globally, highlighting risks in supply-chain software dependencies. The breach follows a pattern of Clop exploits, including the 2023 MOVEit breach, and underscores the need for robust enterprise security measures.
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025-11-07
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Zero-Day Exploit in Oracle E-Business SuiteSupply-Chain Compromise
Vulnerability Exploited: Undisclosed Zero-Day in Oracle E-Business SuiteOracle Cloud Infrastructure Flaw (from March 2025 breach)
Threat Actor: Clop (CL0P) Ransomware Gang
Motivation: Financial Gain (Ransom Demands)Data Theft for Dark Web Sales
Title: Washington Post Oracle E-Business Suite Data Theft and Extortion Attempt
Description: The Washington Post notified nearly 10,000 employees and contractors that their personal and financial data was exposed in an attack exploiting a zero-day vulnerability in Oracle E-Business Suite. The Clop ransomware group is suspected of leveraging CVE-2025-61884 to steal sensitive HR and financial data, followed by an extortion attempt in late September 2025. The breach occurred between July 10 and August 22, 2025, with the investigation concluding on October 27, 2025.
Date Detected: 2025-09-29
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025-10-27
Date Resolved: 2025-10-27
Type: data breach
Attack Vector: exploitation of zero-day vulnerability (CVE-2025-61884)unauthorized access to Oracle E-Business Suite
Vulnerability Exploited: CVE-2025-61884 (Oracle E-Business Suite zero-day)
Threat Actor: Clop ransomware group (suspected)
Motivation: financial gainextortion
Title: The Washington Post Data Breach via Oracle E-Business Suite Vulnerability
Description: The Washington Post, a leading American news organization, experienced a data breach that exposed sensitive information of current and former employees and contractors. The incident stemmed from a previously unknown vulnerability in Oracle’s E-Business Suite software, exploited by the ransomware group CL0P. The breach affected 9,720 individuals across the United States, with exposed data including names, Social Security numbers, tax ID numbers, bank account numbers, and routing numbers.
Date Detected: 2025-09-29
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025-10-27
Type: Data Breach / Ransomware Attack
Attack Vector: Exploitation of Zero-Day Vulnerability in Oracle E-Business Suite
Vulnerability Exploited: Unknown vulnerability in Oracle E-Business Suite (CVE not specified)
Threat Actor: CL0P Ransomware Group
Motivation: Financial Gain (Data Theft for Extortion or Sale)
Title: Washington Post Data Breach Affecting Oracle E-Suite Infrastructure
Description: The Washington Post disclosed a significant data breach affecting more than 9,700 employees and contractors following an external system compromise targeting its Oracle E-Suite infrastructure. The breach occurred on July 10, 2025, and went undetected for nearly 3.5 months before being discovered on October 27, 2025. The compromised data included names, personal identifiers, and additional sensitive information. The organization initiated mandatory notification procedures and provided 12 months of complimentary identity protection services to affected individuals.
Date Detected: 2025-10-27
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025-11-12
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: External hacking activity targeting Oracle E-Suite systems
What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?
Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Breach.
How does the company identify the attack vectors used in incidents ?
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through Compromised Microsoft credentials, Vulnerabilities in Oracle E-Business Suite, Zero-day vulnerability in Oracle E-Business Suite (CVE-2025-61884), Vulnerability in Oracle E-Business Suite and Oracle E-Suite infrastructure.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the impact of each incident ?
Incident : Cyber Espionage WAS901061625
Data Compromised: Email communications, Sensitive correspondence
Systems Affected: Email accounts
Incident : Data Breach WAS3504935110825
Data Compromised: Potential internal data, Financial records (speculated), Operational data (speculated)
Systems Affected: Oracle E-Business Suite
Brand Reputation Impact: High (Media Coverage, Social Media Discussions)
Incident : data breach WAS0092300111325
Data Compromised: Full names, Bank account numbers, Routing numbers, Social security numbers (ssns), Tax and id numbers
Systems Affected: Oracle E-Business Suite (HR, finance, supply chain modules)
Brand Reputation Impact: Potential reputational damage due to exposure of employee/contractor data and extortion attempt
Identity Theft Risk: High (SSNs, bank details, and tax IDs exposed)
Payment Information Risk: High (bank account and routing numbers exposed)
Incident : Data Breach / Ransomware Attack WAS4192541111325
Data Compromised: Names, Social security numbers, Tax id numbers, Bank account numbers, Routing numbers
Systems Affected: Oracle E-Business Suite applications
Brand Reputation Impact: Potential reputational damage due to exposure of employee PII
Legal Liabilities: Disclosures to Maine, Massachusetts, and Vermont Attorney Generals' offices
Identity Theft Risk: High (SSNs, tax IDs, and bank details exposed)
Payment Information Risk: High (bank account and routing numbers exposed)
Incident : Data Breach WAS1332413111425
Systems Affected: Oracle E-Suite infrastructure
Brand Reputation Impact: Potential harm due to exposure of employee and contractor data
Legal Liabilities: Regulatory notifications required under state data breach laws
Identity Theft Risk: High (names and personal identifiers exposed)
What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Email Communications, , Internal Data (Speculated), Financial/Operational Data (Potential), , Personally Identifiable Information (Pii), Financial Data, Tax Information, , Personally Identifiable Information (Pii), Financial Data, , Names, Personal Identifiers, Additional Sensitive Information and .
Which entities were affected by each incident ?
Incident : Cyber Espionage WAS901061625
Entity Name: The Washington Post
Entity Type: News Organization
Industry: Media
Location: Washington, D.C.
Incident : Data Breach WAS3504935110825
Entity Name: The Washington Post
Entity Type: Media Organization
Industry: News/Publishing
Location: United States
Size: Large Enterprise
Incident : Data Breach WAS3504935110825
Entity Name: Oracle Corporation (Indirectly, via E-Business Suite)
Entity Type: Technology Vendor
Industry: Software/Enterprise Solutions
Location: Global
Size: Multinational Corporation
Customers Affected: 140,000+ tenants (from March 2025 breach)
Incident : data breach WAS0092300111325
Entity Name: The Washington Post
Entity Type: media organization
Industry: news/publishing
Location: United States
Size: ~2.5 million digital subscribers; ~10,000 employees/contractors affected
Customers Affected: 9,720 employees and contractors
Incident : Data Breach / Ransomware Attack WAS4192541111325
Entity Name: The Washington Post
Entity Type: Media Organization
Industry: News/Publishing
Location: United States
Customers Affected: 9,720 (employees and contractors)
Incident : Data Breach WAS1332413111425
Entity Name: The Washington Post
Entity Type: Media Organization
Industry: Publishing
Location: 1301 K Street NW, Washington, DC, USA
Customers Affected: 9,720 individuals (including 31 Maine residents)
Response to the Incidents
What measures were taken in response to each incident ?
Incident : Cyber Espionage WAS901061625
Incident Response Plan Activated: Yes
Third Party Assistance: Yes
Containment Measures: Mandatory password resetOrganization-wide security measures
Communication Strategy: Memorandum to affected staff
Incident : Data Breach WAS3504935110825
Incident Response Plan Activated: Acknowledged in Public Statement (Reuters, TechCrunch)
Communication Strategy: Public Statement via Media Outlets (Reuters, TechCrunch)
Incident : data breach WAS0092300111325
Incident Response Plan Activated: True
Remediation Measures: investigation with external expertscollaboration with Oracle
Recovery Measures: 12-month free identity protection (IDX) for affected individualsrecommendations for credit freezes and fraud alerts
Communication Strategy: notification letters to affected individualspublic disclosure
Incident : Data Breach / Ransomware Attack WAS4192541111325
Incident Response Plan Activated: True
Third Party Assistance: Forensic Experts.
Containment Measures: Applied patches for Oracle E-Business Suite vulnerability
Communication Strategy: Notification letters mailed to affected individuals (starting 2025-11-12)Disclosure to state Attorney Generals' offices (Maine, Massachusetts, Vermont)
Incident : Data Breach WAS1332413111425
Incident Response Plan Activated: True
Third Party Assistance: Zwillgen Pllc (Privacy And Data Security Law Firm), Idx (Identity Protection Services).
Recovery Measures: 12 months of complimentary identity protection services (credit monitoring, dark web surveillance, identity theft recovery assistance)
Communication Strategy: Written notifications sent to affected individuals on 2025-11-12; breach notification filed with Maine regulators
What is the company's incident response plan?
Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as Yes, Acknowledged in Public Statement (Reuters, TechCrunch), , , .
How does the company involve third-party assistance in incident response ?
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through Yes, , Forensic Experts, , ZwillGen PLLC (privacy and data security law firm), IDX (identity protection services), .
Data Breach Information
What type of data was compromised in each breach ?
Incident : Cyber Espionage WAS901061625
Type of Data Compromised: Email communications
Sensitivity of Data: High
Incident : Data Breach WAS3504935110825
Type of Data Compromised: Internal data (speculated), Financial/operational data (potential)
Sensitivity of Data: High (Enterprise Financial/Operational Data)
Data Exfiltration: Confirmed (Clop's Modus Operandi)
Incident : data breach WAS0092300111325
Type of Data Compromised: Personally identifiable information (pii), Financial data, Tax information
Number of Records Exposed: 9720
Sensitivity of Data: High (includes SSNs, bank details, and tax IDs)
Incident : Data Breach / Ransomware Attack WAS4192541111325
Type of Data Compromised: Personally identifiable information (pii), Financial data
Number of Records Exposed: 9,720
Sensitivity of Data: High (SSNs, tax IDs, bank details)
Incident : Data Breach WAS1332413111425
Type of Data Compromised: Names, Personal identifiers, Additional sensitive information
Number of Records Exposed: 9,720
Sensitivity of Data: High (personally identifiable information)
What measures does the company take to prevent data exfiltration ?
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: investigation with external experts, collaboration with Oracle, .
How does the company handle incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) ?
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through by mandatory password reset, organization-wide security measures, , applied patches for oracle e-business suite vulnerability and .
Ransomware Information
Was ransomware involved in any of the incidents ?
Incident : Data Breach WAS3504935110825
Ransom Demanded: Likely (Clop's Standard Practice)
Ransomware Strain: Clop (CL0P)
Data Exfiltration: Confirmed (6M+ records in March 2025 Oracle breach)
Incident : data breach WAS0092300111325
Ransom Demanded: True
Ransomware Strain: Clop (suspected)
Data Exfiltration: True
Incident : Data Breach / Ransomware Attack WAS4192541111325
Ransomware Strain: CL0P
Data Exfiltration: True
How does the company recover data encrypted by ransomware ?
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through 12-month free identity protection (IDX) for affected individuals, recommendations for credit freezes and fraud alerts, , 12 months of complimentary identity protection services (credit monitoring, dark web surveillance, identity theft recovery assistance).
Regulatory Compliance
Were there any regulatory violations and fines imposed for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach / Ransomware Attack WAS4192541111325
Regulatory Notifications: Maine Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Attorney GeneralVermont Attorney General
Incident : Data Breach WAS1332413111425
Regulatory Notifications: State data breach laws (e.g., Maine regulators)
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What lessons were learned from each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach WAS3504935110825
Lessons Learned: Supply-chain vulnerabilities in widely used enterprise software (e.g., Oracle E-Business Suite) can cascade across hundreds of organizations., Proactive vulnerability management and third-party risk assessments are critical for mitigating large-scale breaches., Multi-factor authentication and auditing of Oracle installations are recommended to prevent similar exploits., Regulatory oversight for critical software vendors may need strengthening to address systemic risks.
Incident : Data Breach WAS1332413111425
Lessons Learned: The incident underscores the importance of robust monitoring, threat detection, and incident response capabilities for organizations managing sensitive systems and employee data. The extended detection window (3.5 months) highlights vulnerabilities in security monitoring and incident detection systems. Securing access to enterprise platforms is critical, especially with expanding remote work and contractor relationships.
What recommendations were made to prevent future incidents ?
Incident : Data Breach WAS3504935110825
Recommendations: Immediate patching of Oracle E-Business Suite vulnerabilities., Enhanced monitoring of third-party software dependencies., Implementation of multi-factor authentication for enterprise systems., Regular audits of Oracle installations and supply-chain security posture., Development of incident response plans tailored to supply-chain attacks., Collaboration with cybersecurity firms (e.g., CloudSEK) for threat intelligence sharing.Immediate patching of Oracle E-Business Suite vulnerabilities., Enhanced monitoring of third-party software dependencies., Implementation of multi-factor authentication for enterprise systems., Regular audits of Oracle installations and supply-chain security posture., Development of incident response plans tailored to supply-chain attacks., Collaboration with cybersecurity firms (e.g., CloudSEK) for threat intelligence sharing.Immediate patching of Oracle E-Business Suite vulnerabilities., Enhanced monitoring of third-party software dependencies., Implementation of multi-factor authentication for enterprise systems., Regular audits of Oracle installations and supply-chain security posture., Development of incident response plans tailored to supply-chain attacks., Collaboration with cybersecurity firms (e.g., CloudSEK) for threat intelligence sharing.Immediate patching of Oracle E-Business Suite vulnerabilities., Enhanced monitoring of third-party software dependencies., Implementation of multi-factor authentication for enterprise systems., Regular audits of Oracle installations and supply-chain security posture., Development of incident response plans tailored to supply-chain attacks., Collaboration with cybersecurity firms (e.g., CloudSEK) for threat intelligence sharing.Immediate patching of Oracle E-Business Suite vulnerabilities., Enhanced monitoring of third-party software dependencies., Implementation of multi-factor authentication for enterprise systems., Regular audits of Oracle installations and supply-chain security posture., Development of incident response plans tailored to supply-chain attacks., Collaboration with cybersecurity firms (e.g., CloudSEK) for threat intelligence sharing.Immediate patching of Oracle E-Business Suite vulnerabilities., Enhanced monitoring of third-party software dependencies., Implementation of multi-factor authentication for enterprise systems., Regular audits of Oracle installations and supply-chain security posture., Development of incident response plans tailored to supply-chain attacks., Collaboration with cybersecurity firms (e.g., CloudSEK) for threat intelligence sharing.
Incident : data breach WAS0092300111325
Recommendations: Apply patches for CVE-2025-61884 promptly, Monitor Oracle E-Business Suite for unauthorized access, Enhance identity protection for employees (e.g., credit freezes, fraud alerts), Review third-party software vulnerabilities proactivelyApply patches for CVE-2025-61884 promptly, Monitor Oracle E-Business Suite for unauthorized access, Enhance identity protection for employees (e.g., credit freezes, fraud alerts), Review third-party software vulnerabilities proactivelyApply patches for CVE-2025-61884 promptly, Monitor Oracle E-Business Suite for unauthorized access, Enhance identity protection for employees (e.g., credit freezes, fraud alerts), Review third-party software vulnerabilities proactivelyApply patches for CVE-2025-61884 promptly, Monitor Oracle E-Business Suite for unauthorized access, Enhance identity protection for employees (e.g., credit freezes, fraud alerts), Review third-party software vulnerabilities proactively
Incident : Data Breach / Ransomware Attack WAS4192541111325
Recommendations: Monitor financial accounts and credit reports for suspicious activity, Enroll in the provided 24 months of IDX identity protection servicesMonitor financial accounts and credit reports for suspicious activity, Enroll in the provided 24 months of IDX identity protection services
Incident : Data Breach WAS1332413111425
Recommendations: Implement enhanced security monitoring and threat detection systems to reduce the time between breach occurrence and discovery., Strengthen access controls and security measures for enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems like Oracle E-Suite., Provide identity protection services to affected individuals to mitigate risks of fraud or identity theft., Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments to identify and address potential weaknesses in critical systems.Implement enhanced security monitoring and threat detection systems to reduce the time between breach occurrence and discovery., Strengthen access controls and security measures for enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems like Oracle E-Suite., Provide identity protection services to affected individuals to mitigate risks of fraud or identity theft., Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments to identify and address potential weaknesses in critical systems.Implement enhanced security monitoring and threat detection systems to reduce the time between breach occurrence and discovery., Strengthen access controls and security measures for enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems like Oracle E-Suite., Provide identity protection services to affected individuals to mitigate risks of fraud or identity theft., Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments to identify and address potential weaknesses in critical systems.Implement enhanced security monitoring and threat detection systems to reduce the time between breach occurrence and discovery., Strengthen access controls and security measures for enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems like Oracle E-Suite., Provide identity protection services to affected individuals to mitigate risks of fraud or identity theft., Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments to identify and address potential weaknesses in critical systems.
What are the key lessons learned from past incidents ?
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are Supply-chain vulnerabilities in widely used enterprise software (e.g., Oracle E-Business Suite) can cascade across hundreds of organizations.,Proactive vulnerability management and third-party risk assessments are critical for mitigating large-scale breaches.,Multi-factor authentication and auditing of Oracle installations are recommended to prevent similar exploits.,Regulatory oversight for critical software vendors may need strengthening to address systemic risks.The incident underscores the importance of robust monitoring, threat detection, and incident response capabilities for organizations managing sensitive systems and employee data. The extended detection window (3.5 months) highlights vulnerabilities in security monitoring and incident detection systems. Securing access to enterprise platforms is critical, especially with expanding remote work and contractor relationships.
References
Where can I find more information about each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach WAS3504935110825
Source: Washington Post Public Statement (via Reuters)
Date Accessed: 2025-11-06
Incident : Data Breach WAS3504935110825
Source: CloudSEK Report (March 2025 Oracle Cloud Breach)
Date Accessed: 2025-03
Incident : Data Breach WAS3504935110825
Source: Social Media (X/Twitter Posts)
Date Accessed: 2025-11-07
Incident : data breach WAS0092300111325
Source: BleepingComputer
Incident : data breach WAS0092300111325
Source: The Washington Post (notification letter to affected individuals)
Incident : Data Breach / Ransomware Attack WAS4192541111325
Source: The Washington Post Breach Notification (Example)
Incident : Data Breach WAS1332413111425
Source: GBHackers (GBH)
Incident : Data Breach WAS1332413111425
Source: Maine Regulatory Breach Notification (filed by ZwillGen PLLC)
Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: Washington Post Public Statement (via Reuters)Date Accessed: 2025-11-06, and Source: TechCrunchDate Accessed: 2025-11-07, and Source: ReutersDate Accessed: 2025-11-06, and Source: CloudSEK Report (March 2025 Oracle Cloud Breach)Date Accessed: 2025-03, and Source: CybernewsDate Accessed: 2025-11-06, and Source: TechNaduDate Accessed: 2025-11-07, and Source: DevdiscourseDate Accessed: 2025-11-07, and Source: Social Media (X/Twitter Posts)Date Accessed: 2025-11-07, and Source: BleepingComputer, and Source: The Washington Post (notification letter to affected individuals), and Source: The Washington Post Breach Notification (Example), and Source: GBHackers (GBH), and Source: Maine Regulatory Breach Notification (filed by ZwillGen PLLC).
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the investigation for each incident ?
Incident : Cyber Espionage WAS901061625
Investigation Status: Ongoing
Incident : Data Breach WAS3504935110825
Investigation Status: Ongoing (Limited Details Disclosed)
Incident : data breach WAS0092300111325
Investigation Status: Completed (as of 2025-10-27)
Incident : Data Breach / Ransomware Attack WAS4192541111325
Investigation Status: Completed (forensic investigation confirmed exploit and scope)
Incident : Data Breach WAS1332413111425
Investigation Status: Ongoing (as of disclosure date)
How does the company communicate the status of incident investigations to stakeholders ?
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through Memorandum To Affected Staff, Public Statement via Media Outlets (Reuters, TechCrunch), Notification Letters To Affected Individuals, Public Disclosure, Notification Letters Mailed To Affected Individuals (Starting 2025-11-12), Disclosure To State Attorney Generals' Offices (Maine, Massachusetts, Vermont) and Written notifications sent to affected individuals on 2025-11-12; breach notification filed with Maine regulators.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Were there any advisories issued to stakeholders or customers for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach WAS3504935110825
Stakeholder Advisories: Public Statements via Media (Reuters, TechCrunch)
Incident : data breach WAS0092300111325
Stakeholder Advisories: 12-Month Identity Protection (Idx) Offered To Affected Individuals.
Incident : Data Breach / Ransomware Attack WAS4192541111325
Stakeholder Advisories: Notifications sent to affected employees/contractors and state regulators
Customer Advisories: Affected individuals notified via mail with guidance on identity protection
Incident : Data Breach WAS1332413111425
Customer Advisories: Affected individuals advised to monitor personal information and utilize provided identity protection services (credit monitoring, dark web surveillance, identity theft recovery).
What advisories does the company provide to stakeholders and customers following an incident ?
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: were Public Statements via Media (Reuters, TechCrunch), 12-Month Identity Protection (Idx) Offered To Affected Individuals, Notifications sent to affected employees/contractors and state regulators, Affected individuals notified via mail with guidance on identity protection, Affected individuals advised to monitor personal information and utilize provided identity protection services (credit monitoring, dark web surveillance and identity theft recovery)..
Initial Access Broker
How did the initial access broker gain entry for each incident ?
Incident : Cyber Espionage WAS901061625
Entry Point: Compromised Microsoft credentials
High Value Targets: Journalists Covering National Security And Economic Policy,
Data Sold on Dark Web: Journalists Covering National Security And Economic Policy,
Incident : Data Breach WAS3504935110825
Entry Point: Vulnerabilities in Oracle E-Business Suite
High Value Targets: Enterprise Financial/Operational Data,
Data Sold on Dark Web: Enterprise Financial/Operational Data,
Incident : data breach WAS0092300111325
Entry Point: Zero-day vulnerability in Oracle E-Business Suite (CVE-2025-61884)
High Value Targets: Hr Data, Financial Data, Employee/Contractor Pii,
Data Sold on Dark Web: Hr Data, Financial Data, Employee/Contractor Pii,
Incident : Data Breach / Ransomware Attack WAS4192541111325
Entry Point: Vulnerability in Oracle E-Business Suite
High Value Targets: Employee Pii And Financial Data,
Data Sold on Dark Web: Employee Pii And Financial Data,
Incident : Data Breach WAS1332413111425
Entry Point: Oracle E-Suite infrastructure
High Value Targets: Employee And Contractor Data,
Data Sold on Dark Web: Employee And Contractor Data,
Post-Incident Analysis
What were the root causes and corrective actions taken for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach WAS3504935110825
Root Causes: Zero-Day Exploits In Oracle E-Business Suite, Supply-Chain Dependency Risks, Delayed Patching Or Lack Of Vulnerability Awareness,
Corrective Actions: Oracle'S Ongoing Efforts To Address Flaws (Unspecified Patches), Industry Recommendations For Auditing Oracle Installations, Calls For Enhanced Regulatory Oversight On Enterprise Software Vendors,
Incident : data breach WAS0092300111325
Root Causes: Unpatched Zero-Day Vulnerability In Oracle E-Business Suite, Lack Of Proactive Monitoring For Novel Exploits,
Incident : Data Breach / Ransomware Attack WAS4192541111325
Root Causes: Exploitation Of Zero-Day Vulnerability In Third-Party Software (Oracle E-Business Suite), Delayed Detection (Breach Occurred July–August 2025, Detected In September 2025),
Corrective Actions: Applied Vendor-Provided Patches For The Vulnerability, Offered Identity Protection Services To Affected Individuals,
Incident : Data Breach WAS1332413111425
Root Causes: Inadequate Security Monitoring And Incident Detection Capabilities (3.5-Month Delay In Detection)., Vulnerabilities In Oracle E-Suite Infrastructure Exploited By External Threat Actors.,
What is the company's process for conducting post-incident analysis ?
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as Forensic Experts, , Zwillgen Pllc (Privacy And Data Security Law Firm), Idx (Identity Protection Services), .
What corrective actions has the company taken based on post-incident analysis ?
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: Oracle'S Ongoing Efforts To Address Flaws (Unspecified Patches), Industry Recommendations For Auditing Oracle Installations, Calls For Enhanced Regulatory Oversight On Enterprise Software Vendors, , Applied Vendor-Provided Patches For The Vulnerability, Offered Identity Protection Services To Affected Individuals, .
Additional Questions
General Information
What was the amount of the last ransom demanded ?
Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was Likely (Clop's Standard Practice).
Who was the attacking group in the last incident ?
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident were an Foreign GovernmentPotentially China, Clop (CL0P) Ransomware Gang, Clop ransomware group (suspected) and CL0P Ransomware Group.
Incident Details
What was the most recent incident detected ?
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on Thursday.
What was the most recent incident publicly disclosed ?
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on 2025-11-12.
What was the most recent incident resolved ?
Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on 2025-10-27.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were Email communications, Sensitive correspondence, , Potential Internal Data, Financial Records (speculated), Operational Data (speculated), , full names, bank account numbers, routing numbers, Social Security numbers (SSNs), tax and ID numbers, , Names, Social Security Numbers, Tax ID Numbers, Bank Account Numbers, Routing Numbers, and .
What was the most significant system affected in an incident ?
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident were Email accounts and Oracle E-Business Suite and Oracle E-Business Suite (HR, finance, supply chain modules) and Oracle E-Business Suite applications and Oracle E-Suite infrastructure.
Response to the Incidents
What third-party assistance was involved in the most recent incident ?
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was forensic experts, , zwillgen pllc (privacy and data security law firm), idx (identity protection services), .
What containment measures were taken in the most recent incident ?
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were Mandatory password resetOrganization-wide security measures and Applied patches for Oracle E-Business Suite vulnerability.
Data Breach Information
What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach were bank account numbers, tax and ID numbers, Potential Internal Data, Financial Records (speculated), Social Security Numbers, Tax ID Numbers, Routing Numbers, routing numbers, Names, full names, Sensitive correspondence, Social Security numbers (SSNs), Bank Account Numbers, Operational Data (speculated) and Email communications.
What was the number of records exposed in the most significant breach ?
Number of Records Exposed in Most Significant Breach: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was 20.4K.
Ransomware Information
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What was the most significant lesson learned from past incidents ?
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was Regulatory oversight for critical software vendors may need strengthening to address systemic risks., The incident underscores the importance of robust monitoring, threat detection, and incident response capabilities for organizations managing sensitive systems and employee data. The extended detection window (3.5 months) highlights vulnerabilities in security monitoring and incident detection systems. Securing access to enterprise platforms is critical, especially with expanding remote work and contractor relationships.
What was the most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity ?
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was Monitor Oracle E-Business Suite for unauthorized access, Immediate patching of Oracle E-Business Suite vulnerabilities., Monitor financial accounts and credit reports for suspicious activity, Development of incident response plans tailored to supply-chain attacks., Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments to identify and address potential weaknesses in critical systems., Enhance identity protection for employees (e.g., credit freezes, fraud alerts), Enroll in the provided 24 months of IDX identity protection services, Implementation of multi-factor authentication for enterprise systems., Strengthen access controls and security measures for enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems like Oracle E-Suite., Collaboration with cybersecurity firms (e.g., CloudSEK) for threat intelligence sharing., Review third-party software vulnerabilities proactively, Enhanced monitoring of third-party software dependencies., Apply patches for CVE-2025-61884 promptly, Regular audits of Oracle installations and supply-chain security posture., Implement enhanced security monitoring and threat detection systems to reduce the time between breach occurrence and discovery. and Provide identity protection services to affected individuals to mitigate risks of fraud or identity theft..
References
What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident are GBHackers (GBH), CloudSEK Report (March 2025 Oracle Cloud Breach), TechNadu, Social Media (X/Twitter Posts), Maine Regulatory Breach Notification (filed by ZwillGen PLLC), Cybernews, TechCrunch, Reuters, The Washington Post Breach Notification (Example), The Washington Post (notification letter to affected individuals), Washington Post Public Statement (via Reuters), BleepingComputer and Devdiscourse.
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the most recent investigation ?
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is Ongoing.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
What was the most recent stakeholder advisory issued ?
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was Public Statements via Media (Reuters, TechCrunch), 12-month identity protection (IDX) offered to affected individuals, Notifications sent to affected employees/contractors and state regulators, .
What was the most recent customer advisory issued ?
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued were an Affected individuals notified via mail with guidance on identity protection, Affected individuals advised to monitor personal information and utilize provided identity protection services (credit monitoring, dark web surveillance and identity theft recovery).
Initial Access Broker
What was the most recent entry point used by an initial access broker ?
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker were an Compromised Microsoft credentials, Vulnerabilities in Oracle E-Business Suite, Zero-day vulnerability in Oracle E-Business Suite (CVE-2025-61884), Oracle E-Suite infrastructure and Vulnerability in Oracle E-Business Suite.
Post-Incident Analysis
What was the most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis ?
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was Zero-Day Exploits in Oracle E-Business SuiteSupply-Chain Dependency RisksDelayed Patching or Lack of Vulnerability Awareness, Unpatched zero-day vulnerability in Oracle E-Business SuiteLack of proactive monitoring for novel exploits, Exploitation of zero-day vulnerability in third-party software (Oracle E-Business Suite)Delayed detection (breach occurred July–August 2025, detected in September 2025), Inadequate security monitoring and incident detection capabilities (3.5-month delay in detection).Vulnerabilities in Oracle E-Suite infrastructure exploited by external threat actors..
What was the most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis ?
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was Oracle's Ongoing Efforts to Address Flaws (Unspecified Patches)Industry Recommendations for Auditing Oracle InstallationsCalls for Enhanced Regulatory Oversight on Enterprise Software Vendors, Applied vendor-provided patches for the vulnerabilityOffered identity protection services to affected individuals.
.png)
Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)
Description
MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description
XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.
Description
An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.
Description
Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=washingtonpost' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
RapidWhat Do We Measure ?
Incident
Finding
Grade
Digital Assets
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Network Security
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
CMDB (Configuration Management Database)
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Threat Intelligence
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
