WPR
Company Details
Linkedin ID:
washington-post-ripple
Employees number:
None employees
Number of followers:
0
NAICS:
5191311
Industry Type:
Homepage:
washingtonpost.com
IP Addresses:
0
Company ID:
WAS_8113359
Scan Status:
In-progress
Washington Post Ripple Company CyberSecurity Posture
washingtonpost.com
About When news happens, it ripples across the country in the form of opinion journalism. Whether in newspapers, online outlets, blogs or newsletters, those perspectives help readers understand the world in thought-provoking ways. Opinion writing from other publishers Now, The Washington Post is capturing those reactions in one convenient place: Ripple. Ripple leverages the convening power of The Washington Post in a new initiative that features opinion pieces that are written, edited and published by our carefully selected partner outlets and creators. It operates independently from the Washington Post News and Opinion departments, and isn’t subject to their policies and standards. Ripple editors curate a selection of published partner content for republication each day, and we make those stories available outside the paywall. Content selection is driven by our goal of providing readers with a variety of viewpoints from across the nation. Designed to help you discover Ripple groups opinions by topic to help you quickly scan reactions to the news and decide what to read. Whether it’s analysis or arguments, perspectives you haven’t seen in major national outlets, or out-of-the box ideas from different corners of the country, you’ll find it here on Ripple.
Washington Post Ripple A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
WPR Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 750 and 799
WPR
Updated:
- Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
- Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
WPR Global Score (TPRM)XXXX
WPR
- Instant access to detailed risk factors
- Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
- Vulnerabilities
- Findings
WPR Company CyberSecurity News & History
Past Incidents
7
Attack Types
2
WP Intelligence: Employee of Washington Post takes legal path over Oracle EBS Data Breach
Ransomware
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks
Description: In an emerging twist to the ongoing issue of cyberattacks against businesses, a former employee of the Washington Post has taken legal action against the media giant, accusing the company of failing to safeguard the personal data of its staff. This marks an important shift in the ongoing trend of businesses being sued for data leaks not only by consumers or current employees, but also by those who have left the company. The plaintiff, Jun Hee Kim, who worked at the Washington Post between 2018 and 2019, is now suing the company after a major data breach exposed the personal details of more than 9,700 current and former employees. The breach also affected high-profile individuals, including John Bolton, former National Security Advisor to President Donald Trump, whose private data was compromised in the attack. The Breach: A Deeper Look at the Attack The breach itself occurred through a sophisticated attack involving the Clop ransomware gang, which is known for exploiting vulnerabilities in enterprise software. The hackers specifically targeted a zero-day flaw in Oracle’s E-Business Suite (EBS) a comprehensive software used by organizations to manage various business operations, such as financial records, human resources, supply chain logistics, and customer relationship management (CRM). Clop, notorious for its ransomware campaigns, exploited this vulnerability to infiltrate Washington Post’s systems, gaining access to sensitive employee data, including personal identifie
The Washington Post: Ex-Employee Sues Washington Post Over Oracle EBS-Related Data Breach
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks
Description: An ex-Washington Post employee reportedly is suing the news organization in the wake of a data breach the exposed the personal data of almost 10,000 current and former workers, saying the company failed to put adequate protections in place. According to Politico, Jun Hee Kim, who worked at the Post in 2018 and 2019, filed a class action lawsuit that includes the 9.720 people potentially victimized by the hack, which includes not only employees but also independent contractors and contributors, who reportedly included former National Security Adviser John Bolton. Kim reportedly in the lawsuit claims the data breach at the storied news outlet was the result of the Post failing to “implement adequate and reasonable cybersecurity procedures and protocols.” He also says he and other victims have suffered financially due to their data being stolen and that they want the Post to compensate them for identity theft and monitoring services. He also is demanding that the news organization hardened its data security. Growing List of Victims The Post, which has more than 3,000 employees and about 2.5 million digital subscribers – is among a growing number of victims – with some estimates closing in on 100 companies – stemming from a threat group’s exploitations of a zero-day critical vulnerability (tracked as CVE-2025-61882) and other security flaws in Oracle’s E-Business Suite (EBS), a collection of enterprise software used to manage business functions like financials, human resourc
The Washington Post
Ransomware
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence
Description: The Washington Post was breached via an Oracle E-Business Suite zero-day (RCE vulnerability in versions 12.2.3–12.2.14), exploited by the Cl0p ransomware gang and financially motivated group FIN11. Hackers exfiltrated sensitive corporate files and demanded a ransom (reportedly up to $50 million in other cases) for deletion of stolen data. The Post refused to pay, prompting Cl0p to leak its data on their public site, citing the company’s failure to address security. The attack occurred over months before Oracle patched the flaw, affecting over 100 organizations, including high-profile victims like Harvard and Schneider Electric. While the specific leaked data (e.g., internal documents, employee/customer records) was not detailed, the breach posed reputational damage, financial risk, and potential operational disruption. Law enforcement discouraged ransom payments, warning it fuels further attacks. The full scope of compromised data remains undisclosed, but the incident underscores critical vulnerabilities in widely used enterprise software.
The Washington Post: Former Washington Post employee launches class action suit against the outlet after massive data breach
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks
Description: The personal information of almost 10,000 current and former employees of the Post may have been compromised. The data breach occurred between July and August, and The Washington Post notified those impacted last month. | Andrew Harnik/Getty Images By Maggie Miller 12/05/2025 03:56 PM EST A former employee of The Washington Post filed a class action lawsuit against the outlet on Friday over a recent breach that compromised the personal data of thousands of current and former employees. Jun Hee Kim, who according to the filing worked at the Post from 2018 to 2019, filed the suit on behalf of the almost 10,000 current and former employees, and says the Post did not adequately secure their personal data. The Post disclosed the breach earlier this year. It noted that around 9,700 individuals were impacted by the hack, and their personal data, including names, Social Security numbers and banking information, may have been compromised. The breach occurred between July and August, and the news organization notified those impacted last month.
The Washington Post
Ransomware
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks
Description: The Washington Post, a prominent American news organization, suffered a data breach caused by an exploited vulnerability in Oracle’s E-Business Suite software. The ransomware group CL0P gained unauthorized access between July 10, 2025, and August 22, 2025, compromising sensitive personal and financial data of 9,720 current and former employees and contractors. Exposed information included names, Social Security numbers, tax ID numbers, bank account numbers, and routing numbers.The breach was discovered on September 29, 2025, after a threat actor contacted the company. Forensic investigations confirmed the exploit, revealing the vulnerability was widespread among Oracle clients. The Washington Post applied patches, notified affected individuals via mail starting November 12, 2025, and disclosed the incident to the Maine, Massachusetts, and Vermont Attorney Generals' offices. As a remedial measure, the company offered 24 months of free IDX identity protection services to impacted individuals.
The Washington Post
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks
Description: The Washington Post, a major U.S. daily newspaper with ~2.5M digital subscribers, suffered a data breach via a zero-day vulnerability (CVE-2025-61884) in Oracle E-Business Suite between July 10–August 22, 2025. Threat actors (linked to the Clop ransomware group) exploited the flaw to access the Post’s internal ERP system, stealing sensitive employee and contractor data including full names, bank account/routing numbers, Social Security numbers (SSNs), and tax/ID numbers affecting 9,720 individuals. The attackers later attempted extortion in late September. While the breach was contained to internal HR/finance systems, the exposed data poses severe risks of identity theft, financial fraud, and reputational harm. Victims were offered 12 months of free identity protection (IDX) and advised to freeze credit files. The incident follows a separate June 2025 attack on journalists’ emails by state actors, though no direct link was confirmed.
The Washington Post
Ransomware
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence
Description: The Washington Post confirmed it was a victim of a data breach orchestrated by the Clop ransomware gang, exploiting vulnerabilities in Oracle’s E-Business Suite a widely used enterprise software. The attack was part of a large-scale supply-chain campaign targeting hundreds of organizations globally, leveraging zero-day flaws in Oracle’s platform. While specifics of the compromised data remain undisclosed, the breach likely exposed internal financial or operational records, given the suite’s role in business-critical processes. The incident aligns with Clop’s history of high-profile ransomware attacks, including the 2023 MOVEit breach, and follows a March 2025 Oracle Cloud hack where 6 million records were exfiltrated. The Washington Post acknowledged the intrusion in a public statement, linking it to the broader Oracle exploitation wave. Industry experts warn of ongoing risks due to unpatched vulnerabilities in enterprise software, with Clop’s tactics combining data exfiltration, ransom demands, and dark-web data sales. The breach underscores systemic weaknesses in third-party supply-chain security, prompting calls for stricter vendor oversight and proactive patch management.
WPR Company Scoring based on AI Models
Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
Underwriter Stats for WPR
Incidents vs Internet News Industry Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Washington Post Ripple in 2026.
Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Washington Post Ripple in 2026.
Incident Types WPR vs Internet News Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Washington Post Ripple in 2026.
Incident History — WPR (X = Date, Y = Severity)
WPR cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
WPR Company Subsidiaries
About When news happens, it ripples across the country in the form of opinion journalism. Whether in newspapers, online outlets, blogs or newsletters, those perspectives help readers understand the world in thought-provoking ways. Opinion writing from other publishers Now, The Washington Post is capturing those reactions in one convenient place: Ripple. Ripple leverages the convening power of The Washington Post in a new initiative that features opinion pieces that are written, edited and published by our carefully selected partner outlets and creators. It operates independently from the Washington Post News and Opinion departments, and isn’t subject to their policies and standards. Ripple editors curate a selection of published partner content for republication each day, and we make those stories available outside the paywall. Content selection is driven by our goal of providing readers with a variety of viewpoints from across the nation. Designed to help you discover Ripple groups opinions by topic to help you quickly scan reactions to the news and decide what to read. Whether it’s analysis or arguments, perspectives you haven’t seen in major national outlets, or out-of-the box ideas from different corners of the country, you’ll find it here on Ripple.
Loading...
WPR Similar Companies
Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA
Bertelsmann ist ein Medien-, Dienstleistungs- und Bildungsunternehmen mit rund 75.000 Mitarbeitenden, das in gut 50 Ländern der Welt aktiv ist. Zum Konzernverbund gehören das Entertainment-Unternehmen RTL Group, die Buchverlagsgruppe Penguin Random House, das Musikunternehmen BMG, der Dienstleister
Freelancer
A freelancer or freelance worker is a term commonly used for a person who is self-employed and is not necessarily committed to a particular employer long-term. Freelance workers are sometimes represented by a company or a temporary agency that resells freelance labor to clients; others work independ
.png)
WPR CyberSecurity News
January 05, 2026 08:00 AM
The political storms on the horizon in 2026
Opinions from across America, powered by the Washington Post.
November 10, 2025 08:00 AM
Ripple by The Washington Post
Last Tuesday, voters all over the United States sent a resounding message: They were sick of Donald Trump, sick of the Republican Party's...
September 16, 2025 07:00 AM
US and UK to deepen crypto collaboration: Financial Times
The U.S. and the UK plan to collaborate on cryptocurrency oversight, including potentially establishing a "cross-border sandbox," FT...
September 09, 2025 07:00 AM
Jobs revisions ripple across Washington
Plus: White House, Republicans deny released Epstein note {beacon} A MASSIVE REVISION to a year's worth of jobs numbers sparked fresh...
July 16, 2025 07:00 AM
Securing American Competitiveness: Building a Clean and Cyber-Resilient Manufacturing Sector
As the United States invests in transforming its manufacturing sector to reduce emissions and produce clean technologies, it has an...
June 05, 2025 07:00 AM
PR News | Media Manuevers: WaPo to Launch Ripple - Thu., Jun. 5, 2025
The Washington Post's opinion pages may soon be home to commentary from such sources as other newspapers around the country, contributors to Substack and...
June 04, 2025 07:00 AM
The Washington Post will let amateur writers submit opinion columns with the help of what tech?
Nonprofessional writers will soon get to try their hand at writing opinion columns for The Washington Post, so long as they're willing to do it with guidance...
June 04, 2025 07:00 AM
The Washington Post Is Secretly Planning to Start Publishing Articles Created Using AI
The Washington Post, it turns out, has quietly been building an AI tool designed to let underqualified writers publish content in its storied pages.
May 29, 2025 07:00 AM
The U.S. government’s new strategic reserve: Billions in seized crypto
President Donald Trump signed an executive order in March that boosted the spirits of cryptocurrency investors - and created a digital money...
Frequently Asked Questions
Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.
WPR CyberSecurity History Information
Official Website of Washington Post Ripple
The official website of Washington Post Ripple is https://www.washingtonpost.com/ripple/.
Washington Post Ripple’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score
According to Rankiteo, Washington Post Ripple’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 771, reflecting their Fair security posture.
How many security badges does Washington Post Ripple’ have ?
According to Rankiteo, Washington Post Ripple currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.
Has Washington Post Ripple been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?
According to Rankiteo, Washington Post Ripple has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.
Does Washington Post Ripple have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Washington Post Ripple is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.
Does Washington Post Ripple have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Washington Post Ripple does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
Does Washington Post Ripple comply with GDPR ?
According to Rankiteo, Washington Post Ripple is not listed as GDPR compliant.
Does Washington Post Ripple have PCI DSS certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Washington Post Ripple does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.
Does Washington Post Ripple comply with HIPAA ?
According to Rankiteo, Washington Post Ripple is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.
Does Washington Post Ripple have ISO 27001 certification ?
According to Rankiteo,Washington Post Ripple is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.
Industry Classification of Washington Post Ripple
Washington Post Ripple operates primarily in the Internet News industry.
Number of Employees at Washington Post Ripple
Washington Post Ripple employs approximately None employees people worldwide.
Subsidiaries Owned by Washington Post Ripple
Washington Post Ripple presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.
Washington Post Ripple’s LinkedIn Followers
Washington Post Ripple’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 0 followers.
NAICS Classification of Washington Post Ripple
Washington Post Ripple is classified under the NAICS code 5191311, which corresponds to Internet Publishing and Broadcasting and Web Search Portals.
Washington Post Ripple’s Presence on Crunchbase
No, Washington Post Ripple does not have a profile on Crunchbase.
Washington Post Ripple’s Presence on LinkedIn
Yes, Washington Post Ripple maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/washington-post-ripple.
Cybersecurity Incidents Involving Washington Post Ripple
As of January 25, 2026, Rankiteo reports that Washington Post Ripple has experienced 7 cybersecurity incidents.
Number of Peer and Competitor Companies
Washington Post Ripple has an estimated 277 peer or competitor companies worldwide.
What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at Washington Post Ripple ?
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Ransomware and Breach.
What was the total financial impact of these incidents on Washington Post Ripple ?
Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be $0.
How does Washington Post Ripple detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an incident response plan activated with acknowledged in public statement (reuters, techcrunch), and communication strategy with public statement via media outlets (reuters, techcrunch), and and remediation measures with oracle patch (post-exploitation), and communication strategy with public statement by the washington post, communication strategy with law enforcement advisories against ransom payments, and and and remediation measures with investigation with external experts, remediation measures with collaboration with oracle, and recovery measures with 12-month free identity protection (idx) for affected individuals, recovery measures with recommendations for credit freezes and fraud alerts, and communication strategy with notification letters to affected individuals, communication strategy with public disclosure, and and third party assistance with forensic experts, and containment measures with applied patches for oracle e-business suite vulnerability, and communication strategy with notification letters mailed to affected individuals (starting 2025-11-12), communication strategy with disclosure to state attorney generals' offices (maine, massachusetts, vermont), and communication strategy with notified impacted individuals last month..
Incident Details
Can you provide details on each incident ?
Title: Washington Post Data Breach Linked to Clop Ransomware Exploiting Oracle E-Business Suite Vulnerabilities
Description: The Washington Post confirmed it fell victim to a data breach orchestrated by the Clop ransomware gang, which exploited vulnerabilities in Oracle’s E-Business Suite software. This incident is part of a broader campaign targeting hundreds of organizations globally, highlighting risks in supply-chain software dependencies. The breach follows a pattern of Clop exploits, including the 2023 MOVEit breach, and underscores the need for robust enterprise security measures.
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025-11-07
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Zero-Day Exploit in Oracle E-Business SuiteSupply-Chain Compromise
Vulnerability Exploited: Undisclosed Zero-Day in Oracle E-Business SuiteOracle Cloud Infrastructure Flaw (from March 2025 breach)
Threat Actor: Clop (CL0P) Ransomware Gang
Motivation: Financial Gain (Ransom Demands)Data Theft for Dark Web Sales
Title: Cl0p Ransomware Exploits Oracle E-Business Suite Zero-Day to Breach Over 100 Companies, Including The Washington Post
Description: The Cl0p ransomware gang and financially-motivated threat actor FIN11 exploited a remote code execution (RCE) zero-day vulnerability in Oracle E-Business Suite (versions 12.2.3-12.2.14) to breach over 100 companies, including The Washington Post, Harvard University, Schneider Electric, Pan American Steel, and Cox Enterprises. The attacks began months before Oracle released a patch. Victims received ransom demands via email, with at least one company reportedly asked for $50 million. The Washington Post confirmed the breach and refused to pay the ransom, leading Cl0p to leak its data on their leak site. Law enforcement advises against paying ransoms, citing risks of further attacks and funding criminal operations.
Date Detected: 2025-10
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025-10
Type: ransomware
Attack Vector: exploitation of zero-day vulnerability (RCE in Oracle E-Business Suite)email-based ransom demands
Vulnerability Exploited: Remote Code Execution (RCE) zero-day in Oracle E-Business Suite (versions 12.2.3-12.2.14)
Threat Actor: Cl0p ransomware gangFIN11
Motivation: financial gain
Title: Washington Post Oracle E-Business Suite Data Theft and Extortion Attempt
Description: The Washington Post notified nearly 10,000 employees and contractors that their personal and financial data was exposed in an attack exploiting a zero-day vulnerability in Oracle E-Business Suite. The Clop ransomware group is suspected of leveraging CVE-2025-61884 to steal sensitive HR and financial data, followed by an extortion attempt in late September 2025. The breach occurred between July 10 and August 22, 2025, with the investigation concluding on October 27, 2025.
Date Detected: 2025-09-29
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025-10-27
Date Resolved: 2025-10-27
Type: data breach
Attack Vector: exploitation of zero-day vulnerability (CVE-2025-61884)unauthorized access to Oracle E-Business Suite
Vulnerability Exploited: CVE-2025-61884 (Oracle E-Business Suite zero-day)
Threat Actor: Clop ransomware group (suspected)
Motivation: financial gainextortion
Title: The Washington Post Data Breach via Oracle E-Business Suite Vulnerability
Description: The Washington Post, a leading American news organization, experienced a data breach that exposed sensitive information of current and former employees and contractors. The incident stemmed from a previously unknown vulnerability in Oracle’s E-Business Suite software, exploited by the ransomware group CL0P. The breach affected 9,720 individuals across the United States, with exposed data including names, Social Security numbers, tax ID numbers, bank account numbers, and routing numbers.
Date Detected: 2025-09-29
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025-10-27
Type: Data Breach / Ransomware Attack
Attack Vector: Exploitation of Zero-Day Vulnerability in Oracle E-Business Suite
Vulnerability Exploited: Unknown vulnerability in Oracle E-Business Suite (CVE not specified)
Threat Actor: CL0P Ransomware Group
Motivation: Financial Gain (Data Theft for Extortion or Sale)
Title: Washington Post Employee Data Breach
Description: The personal information of almost 10,000 current and former employees of The Washington Post may have been compromised in a data breach that occurred between July and August. The breach exposed names, Social Security numbers, and banking information.
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025-12-05
Type: Data Breach
Title: Washington Post Data Breach Lawsuit
Description: An ex-Washington Post employee filed a class action lawsuit against the news organization after a data breach exposed the personal data of nearly 10,000 current and former workers, alleging inadequate cybersecurity protections. The breach affected employees, independent contractors, and contributors, including high-profile individuals like former National Security Adviser John Bolton.
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Exploitation of zero-day vulnerability (CVE-2025-61882) and other security flaws in Oracle E-Business Suite (EBS)
Vulnerability Exploited: CVE-2025-61882, Oracle E-Business Suite (EBS) security flaws
Title: Washington Post Data Breach Lawsuit by Former Employee
Description: A former employee of the Washington Post, Jun Hee Kim, has filed a lawsuit against the company for failing to safeguard personal data of its staff after a major data breach exposed the personal details of over 9,700 current and former employees, including high-profile individuals like John Bolton.
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Exploitation of zero-day vulnerability in Oracle E-Business Suite (EBS)
Vulnerability Exploited: Zero-day flaw in Oracle E-Business Suite (EBS)
Threat Actor: Clop ransomware gang
What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?
Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Ransomware.
How does the company identify the attack vectors used in incidents ?
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through Vulnerabilities in Oracle E-Business Suite, Oracle E-Business Suite zero-day (RCE), Zero-day vulnerability in Oracle E-Business Suite (CVE-2025-61884) and Vulnerability in Oracle E-Business Suite.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the impact of each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach WAS3504935110825
Data Compromised: Potential internal data, Financial records (speculated), Operational data (speculated)
Systems Affected: Oracle E-Business Suite
Brand Reputation Impact: High (Media Coverage, Social Media Discussions)
Incident : ransomware WAS0892108111025
Systems Affected: Oracle E-Business Suite (versions 12.2.3-12.2.14)
Incident : data breach WAS0092300111325
Data Compromised: Full names, Bank account numbers, Routing numbers, Social security numbers (ssns), Tax and id numbers
Systems Affected: Oracle E-Business Suite (HR, finance, supply chain modules)
Brand Reputation Impact: Potential reputational damage due to exposure of employee/contractor data and extortion attempt
Identity Theft Risk: High (SSNs, bank details, and tax IDs exposed)
Payment Information Risk: High (bank account and routing numbers exposed)
Incident : Data Breach / Ransomware Attack WAS4192541111325
Data Compromised: Names, Social security numbers, Tax id numbers, Bank account numbers, Routing numbers
Systems Affected: Oracle E-Business Suite applications
Brand Reputation Impact: Potential reputational damage due to exposure of employee PII
Legal Liabilities: Disclosures to Maine, Massachusetts, and Vermont Attorney Generals' offices
Identity Theft Risk: High (SSNs, tax IDs, and bank details exposed)
Payment Information Risk: High (bank account and routing numbers exposed)
Incident : Data Breach WAS1764972327
Data Compromised: Personal data, including names, Social Security numbers, and banking information
Legal Liabilities: Class action lawsuit filed
Identity Theft Risk: High
Payment Information Risk: High
Incident : Data Breach WAS1765174011
Financial Loss: Victims suffered financial losses
Data Compromised: Personal data of 9,720 individuals
Systems Affected: Oracle E-Business Suite (EBS)
Legal Liabilities: Class action lawsuit filed
Identity Theft Risk: Victims seek compensation for identity theft and monitoring services
Incident : Data Breach WAS1765181094
Data Compromised: Personal details of employees and high-profile individuals
Systems Affected: Oracle E-Business Suite (EBS)
Legal Liabilities: Lawsuit filed by former employee
Identity Theft Risk: High
What is the average financial loss per incident ?
Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is $0.00.
What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Internal Data (Speculated), Financial/Operational Data (Potential), , Sensitive Corporate Files, , Personally Identifiable Information (Pii), Financial Data, Tax Information, , Personally Identifiable Information (Pii), Financial Data, , Names, Social Security Numbers, Banking Information, , Personal data and Personal identifiable information (PII).
Which entities were affected by each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach WAS3504935110825
Entity Name: The Washington Post
Entity Type: Media Organization
Industry: News/Publishing
Location: United States
Size: Large Enterprise
Incident : Data Breach WAS3504935110825
Entity Name: Oracle Corporation (Indirectly, via E-Business Suite)
Entity Type: Technology Vendor
Industry: Software/Enterprise Solutions
Location: Global
Size: Multinational Corporation
Customers Affected: 140,000+ tenants (from March 2025 breach)
Incident : ransomware WAS0892108111025
Entity Name: The Washington Post
Entity Type: media organization
Industry: news/publishing
Location: United States
Incident : ransomware WAS0892108111025
Entity Name: Harvard University
Entity Type: educational institution
Industry: education
Location: United States
Incident : ransomware WAS0892108111025
Entity Name: Schneider Electric
Entity Type: corporation
Industry: energy management/automation
Location: France (global operations)
Incident : ransomware WAS0892108111025
Entity Name: Pan American Steel
Entity Type: corporation
Industry: manufacturing/steel
Incident : ransomware WAS0892108111025
Entity Name: Cox Enterprises
Entity Type: corporation
Industry: media, automotive, telecommunications
Location: United States
Incident : ransomware WAS0892108111025
Entity Name: Over 100 other unnamed companies
Incident : data breach WAS0092300111325
Entity Name: The Washington Post
Entity Type: media organization
Industry: news/publishing
Location: United States
Size: ~2.5 million digital subscribers; ~10,000 employees/contractors affected
Customers Affected: 9,720 employees and contractors
Incident : Data Breach / Ransomware Attack WAS4192541111325
Entity Name: The Washington Post
Entity Type: Media Organization
Industry: News/Publishing
Location: United States
Customers Affected: 9,720 (employees and contractors)
Incident : Data Breach WAS1764972327
Entity Name: The Washington Post
Entity Type: Media Organization
Industry: News and Media
Customers Affected: 9,700 current and former employees
Incident : Data Breach WAS1765174011
Entity Name: The Washington Post
Entity Type: News Organization
Industry: Media
Size: 3,000+ employees, 2.5 million digital subscribers
Customers Affected: 9,720 (employees, independent contractors, contributors)
Incident : Data Breach WAS1765181094
Entity Name: The Washington Post
Entity Type: Media Organization
Industry: Media/News
Location: United States
Customers Affected: 9,700+ current and former employees
Response to the Incidents
What measures were taken in response to each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach WAS3504935110825
Incident Response Plan Activated: Acknowledged in Public Statement (Reuters, TechCrunch)
Communication Strategy: Public Statement via Media Outlets (Reuters, TechCrunch)
Incident : ransomware WAS0892108111025
Remediation Measures: Oracle patch (post-exploitation)
Communication Strategy: public statement by The Washington Postlaw enforcement advisories against ransom payments
Incident : data breach WAS0092300111325
Incident Response Plan Activated: True
Remediation Measures: investigation with external expertscollaboration with Oracle
Recovery Measures: 12-month free identity protection (IDX) for affected individualsrecommendations for credit freezes and fraud alerts
Communication Strategy: notification letters to affected individualspublic disclosure
Incident : Data Breach / Ransomware Attack WAS4192541111325
Incident Response Plan Activated: True
Third Party Assistance: Forensic Experts.
Containment Measures: Applied patches for Oracle E-Business Suite vulnerability
Communication Strategy: Notification letters mailed to affected individuals (starting 2025-11-12)Disclosure to state Attorney Generals' offices (Maine, Massachusetts, Vermont)
Incident : Data Breach WAS1764972327
Communication Strategy: Notified impacted individuals last month
What is the company's incident response plan?
Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as Acknowledged in Public Statement (Reuters, TechCrunch), , .
How does the company involve third-party assistance in incident response ?
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through Forensic Experts, .
Data Breach Information
What type of data was compromised in each breach ?
Incident : Data Breach WAS3504935110825
Type of Data Compromised: Internal data (speculated), Financial/operational data (potential)
Sensitivity of Data: High (Enterprise Financial/Operational Data)
Data Exfiltration: Confirmed (Clop's Modus Operandi)
Incident : ransomware WAS0892108111025
Type of Data Compromised: Sensitive corporate files
Sensitivity of Data: high
Incident : data breach WAS0092300111325
Type of Data Compromised: Personally identifiable information (pii), Financial data, Tax information
Number of Records Exposed: 9720
Sensitivity of Data: High (includes SSNs, bank details, and tax IDs)
Incident : Data Breach / Ransomware Attack WAS4192541111325
Type of Data Compromised: Personally identifiable information (pii), Financial data
Number of Records Exposed: 9,720
Sensitivity of Data: High (SSNs, tax IDs, bank details)
Incident : Data Breach WAS1764972327
Type of Data Compromised: Names, Social security numbers, Banking information
Number of Records Exposed: 9,700
Sensitivity of Data: High
Personally Identifiable Information: Yes
Incident : Data Breach WAS1765174011
Type of Data Compromised: Personal data
Number of Records Exposed: 9,720
Sensitivity of Data: Personally identifiable information (PII)
Personally Identifiable Information: Yes
Incident : Data Breach WAS1765181094
Type of Data Compromised: Personal identifiable information (PII)
Number of Records Exposed: 9,700+
Sensitivity of Data: High
Personally Identifiable Information: Yes
What measures does the company take to prevent data exfiltration ?
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: Oracle patch (post-exploitation), , investigation with external experts, collaboration with Oracle, .
How does the company handle incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) ?
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through by applied patches for oracle e-business suite vulnerability and .
Ransomware Information
Was ransomware involved in any of the incidents ?
Incident : Data Breach WAS3504935110825
Ransom Demanded: Likely (Clop's Standard Practice)
Ransomware Strain: Clop (CL0P)
Data Exfiltration: Confirmed (6M+ records in March 2025 Oracle breach)
Incident : ransomware WAS0892108111025
Ransom Demanded: True
Ransomware Strain: Cl0p
Data Exfiltration: True
Incident : data breach WAS0092300111325
Ransom Demanded: True
Ransomware Strain: Clop (suspected)
Data Exfiltration: True
Incident : Data Breach / Ransomware Attack WAS4192541111325
Ransomware Strain: CL0P
Data Exfiltration: True
How does the company recover data encrypted by ransomware ?
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through 12-month free identity protection (IDX) for affected individuals, recommendations for credit freezes and fraud alerts, .
Regulatory Compliance
Were there any regulatory violations and fines imposed for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach / Ransomware Attack WAS4192541111325
Regulatory Notifications: Maine Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Attorney GeneralVermont Attorney General
Incident : Data Breach WAS1764972327
Legal Actions: Class action lawsuit filed
Incident : Data Breach WAS1765174011
Legal Actions: Class action lawsuit
Incident : Data Breach WAS1765181094
Legal Actions: Lawsuit filed by former employee
How does the company ensure compliance with regulatory requirements ?
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through Class action lawsuit filed, Class action lawsuit, Lawsuit filed by former employee.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What lessons were learned from each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach WAS3504935110825
Lessons Learned: Supply-chain vulnerabilities in widely used enterprise software (e.g., Oracle E-Business Suite) can cascade across hundreds of organizations., Proactive vulnerability management and third-party risk assessments are critical for mitigating large-scale breaches., Multi-factor authentication and auditing of Oracle installations are recommended to prevent similar exploits., Regulatory oversight for critical software vendors may need strengthening to address systemic risks.
What recommendations were made to prevent future incidents ?
Incident : Data Breach WAS3504935110825
Recommendations: Immediate patching of Oracle E-Business Suite vulnerabilities., Enhanced monitoring of third-party software dependencies., Implementation of multi-factor authentication for enterprise systems., Regular audits of Oracle installations and supply-chain security posture., Development of incident response plans tailored to supply-chain attacks., Collaboration with cybersecurity firms (e.g., CloudSEK) for threat intelligence sharing.Immediate patching of Oracle E-Business Suite vulnerabilities., Enhanced monitoring of third-party software dependencies., Implementation of multi-factor authentication for enterprise systems., Regular audits of Oracle installations and supply-chain security posture., Development of incident response plans tailored to supply-chain attacks., Collaboration with cybersecurity firms (e.g., CloudSEK) for threat intelligence sharing.Immediate patching of Oracle E-Business Suite vulnerabilities., Enhanced monitoring of third-party software dependencies., Implementation of multi-factor authentication for enterprise systems., Regular audits of Oracle installations and supply-chain security posture., Development of incident response plans tailored to supply-chain attacks., Collaboration with cybersecurity firms (e.g., CloudSEK) for threat intelligence sharing.Immediate patching of Oracle E-Business Suite vulnerabilities., Enhanced monitoring of third-party software dependencies., Implementation of multi-factor authentication for enterprise systems., Regular audits of Oracle installations and supply-chain security posture., Development of incident response plans tailored to supply-chain attacks., Collaboration with cybersecurity firms (e.g., CloudSEK) for threat intelligence sharing.Immediate patching of Oracle E-Business Suite vulnerabilities., Enhanced monitoring of third-party software dependencies., Implementation of multi-factor authentication for enterprise systems., Regular audits of Oracle installations and supply-chain security posture., Development of incident response plans tailored to supply-chain attacks., Collaboration with cybersecurity firms (e.g., CloudSEK) for threat intelligence sharing.Immediate patching of Oracle E-Business Suite vulnerabilities., Enhanced monitoring of third-party software dependencies., Implementation of multi-factor authentication for enterprise systems., Regular audits of Oracle installations and supply-chain security posture., Development of incident response plans tailored to supply-chain attacks., Collaboration with cybersecurity firms (e.g., CloudSEK) for threat intelligence sharing.
Incident : ransomware WAS0892108111025
Recommendations: Do not pay ransom demands (per law enforcement advice), Apply vendor patches promptly, Monitor for zero-day exploits in critical enterprise softwareDo not pay ransom demands (per law enforcement advice), Apply vendor patches promptly, Monitor for zero-day exploits in critical enterprise softwareDo not pay ransom demands (per law enforcement advice), Apply vendor patches promptly, Monitor for zero-day exploits in critical enterprise software
Incident : data breach WAS0092300111325
Recommendations: Apply patches for CVE-2025-61884 promptly, Monitor Oracle E-Business Suite for unauthorized access, Enhance identity protection for employees (e.g., credit freezes, fraud alerts), Review third-party software vulnerabilities proactivelyApply patches for CVE-2025-61884 promptly, Monitor Oracle E-Business Suite for unauthorized access, Enhance identity protection for employees (e.g., credit freezes, fraud alerts), Review third-party software vulnerabilities proactivelyApply patches for CVE-2025-61884 promptly, Monitor Oracle E-Business Suite for unauthorized access, Enhance identity protection for employees (e.g., credit freezes, fraud alerts), Review third-party software vulnerabilities proactivelyApply patches for CVE-2025-61884 promptly, Monitor Oracle E-Business Suite for unauthorized access, Enhance identity protection for employees (e.g., credit freezes, fraud alerts), Review third-party software vulnerabilities proactively
Incident : Data Breach / Ransomware Attack WAS4192541111325
Recommendations: Monitor financial accounts and credit reports for suspicious activity, Enroll in the provided 24 months of IDX identity protection servicesMonitor financial accounts and credit reports for suspicious activity, Enroll in the provided 24 months of IDX identity protection services
Incident : Data Breach WAS1765174011
Recommendations: Hardened data security measures
What are the key lessons learned from past incidents ?
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are Supply-chain vulnerabilities in widely used enterprise software (e.g., Oracle E-Business Suite) can cascade across hundreds of organizations.,Proactive vulnerability management and third-party risk assessments are critical for mitigating large-scale breaches.,Multi-factor authentication and auditing of Oracle installations are recommended to prevent similar exploits.,Regulatory oversight for critical software vendors may need strengthening to address systemic risks.
What recommendations has the company implemented to improve cybersecurity ?
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: Hardened data security measures.
References
Where can I find more information about each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach WAS3504935110825
Source: Washington Post Public Statement (via Reuters)
Date Accessed: 2025-11-06
Incident : Data Breach WAS3504935110825
Source: CloudSEK Report (March 2025 Oracle Cloud Breach)
Date Accessed: 2025-03
Incident : Data Breach WAS3504935110825
Source: Social Media (X/Twitter Posts)
Date Accessed: 2025-11-07
Incident : ransomware WAS0892108111025
Source: TechCrunch
Incident : ransomware WAS0892108111025
Source: TechRadar
Incident : data breach WAS0092300111325
Source: BleepingComputer
Incident : data breach WAS0092300111325
Source: The Washington Post (notification letter to affected individuals)
Incident : Data Breach / Ransomware Attack WAS4192541111325
Source: The Washington Post Breach Notification (Example)
Incident : Data Breach WAS1765174011
Source: Politico
Incident : Data Breach WAS1765181094
Source: Cyber Incident Description
Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: Washington Post Public Statement (via Reuters)Date Accessed: 2025-11-06, and Source: TechCrunchDate Accessed: 2025-11-07, and Source: ReutersDate Accessed: 2025-11-06, and Source: CloudSEK Report (March 2025 Oracle Cloud Breach)Date Accessed: 2025-03, and Source: CybernewsDate Accessed: 2025-11-06, and Source: TechNaduDate Accessed: 2025-11-07, and Source: DevdiscourseDate Accessed: 2025-11-07, and Source: Social Media (X/Twitter Posts)Date Accessed: 2025-11-07, and Source: TechCrunch, and Source: TechRadar, and Source: BleepingComputer, and Source: The Washington Post (notification letter to affected individuals), and Source: The Washington Post Breach Notification (Example), and Source: PoliticoDate Accessed: 2025-12-05, and Source: Politico, and Source: Cyber Incident Description.
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the investigation for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach WAS3504935110825
Investigation Status: Ongoing (Limited Details Disclosed)
Incident : ransomware WAS0892108111025
Investigation Status: ongoing (partial victim list confirmed; full scope unknown)
Incident : data breach WAS0092300111325
Investigation Status: Completed (as of 2025-10-27)
Incident : Data Breach / Ransomware Attack WAS4192541111325
Investigation Status: Completed (forensic investigation confirmed exploit and scope)
How does the company communicate the status of incident investigations to stakeholders ?
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through Public Statement via Media Outlets (Reuters, TechCrunch), Public Statement By The Washington Post, Law Enforcement Advisories Against Ransom Payments, Notification Letters To Affected Individuals, Public Disclosure, Notification Letters Mailed To Affected Individuals (Starting 2025-11-12), Disclosure To State Attorney Generals' Offices (Maine, Massachusetts, Vermont) and Notified impacted individuals last month.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Were there any advisories issued to stakeholders or customers for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach WAS3504935110825
Stakeholder Advisories: Public Statements via Media (Reuters, TechCrunch)
Incident : ransomware WAS0892108111025
Stakeholder Advisories: Law Enforcement Warnings Against Ransom Payments.
Customer Advisories: The Washington Post public statement
Incident : data breach WAS0092300111325
Stakeholder Advisories: 12-Month Identity Protection (Idx) Offered To Affected Individuals.
Incident : Data Breach / Ransomware Attack WAS4192541111325
Stakeholder Advisories: Notifications sent to affected employees/contractors and state regulators
Customer Advisories: Affected individuals notified via mail with guidance on identity protection
What advisories does the company provide to stakeholders and customers following an incident ?
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: were Public Statements via Media (Reuters, TechCrunch), Law Enforcement Warnings Against Ransom Payments, The Washington Post Public Statement, , 12-Month Identity Protection (Idx) Offered To Affected Individuals, Notifications sent to affected employees/contractors and state regulators and Affected individuals notified via mail with guidance on identity protection.
Initial Access Broker
How did the initial access broker gain entry for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach WAS3504935110825
Entry Point: Vulnerabilities in Oracle E-Business Suite
High Value Targets: Enterprise Financial/Operational Data,
Data Sold on Dark Web: Enterprise Financial/Operational Data,
Incident : ransomware WAS0892108111025
Entry Point: Oracle E-Business Suite zero-day (RCE)
Reconnaissance Period: months (attacks occurred before patch release)
High Value Targets: Executives (Via Ransom Demand Emails),
Data Sold on Dark Web: Executives (Via Ransom Demand Emails),
Incident : data breach WAS0092300111325
Entry Point: Zero-day vulnerability in Oracle E-Business Suite (CVE-2025-61884)
High Value Targets: Hr Data, Financial Data, Employee/Contractor Pii,
Data Sold on Dark Web: Hr Data, Financial Data, Employee/Contractor Pii,
Incident : Data Breach / Ransomware Attack WAS4192541111325
Entry Point: Vulnerability in Oracle E-Business Suite
High Value Targets: Employee Pii And Financial Data,
Data Sold on Dark Web: Employee Pii And Financial Data,
Post-Incident Analysis
What were the root causes and corrective actions taken for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach WAS3504935110825
Root Causes: Zero-Day Exploits In Oracle E-Business Suite, Supply-Chain Dependency Risks, Delayed Patching Or Lack Of Vulnerability Awareness,
Corrective Actions: Oracle'S Ongoing Efforts To Address Flaws (Unspecified Patches), Industry Recommendations For Auditing Oracle Installations, Calls For Enhanced Regulatory Oversight On Enterprise Software Vendors,
Incident : ransomware WAS0892108111025
Root Causes: Unpatched Zero-Day Vulnerability In Oracle E-Business Suite, Delayed Patch Application By Victims,
Corrective Actions: Oracle Released Patch For Versions 12.2.3-12.2.14,
Incident : data breach WAS0092300111325
Root Causes: Unpatched Zero-Day Vulnerability In Oracle E-Business Suite, Lack Of Proactive Monitoring For Novel Exploits,
Incident : Data Breach / Ransomware Attack WAS4192541111325
Root Causes: Exploitation Of Zero-Day Vulnerability In Third-Party Software (Oracle E-Business Suite), Delayed Detection (Breach Occurred July–August 2025, Detected In September 2025),
Corrective Actions: Applied Vendor-Provided Patches For The Vulnerability, Offered Identity Protection Services To Affected Individuals,
Incident : Data Breach WAS1765174011
Root Causes: Failure to implement adequate and reasonable cybersecurity procedures and protocols
Incident : Data Breach WAS1765181094
Root Causes: Failure to patch zero-day vulnerability in Oracle E-Business Suite (EBS)
What is the company's process for conducting post-incident analysis ?
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as Forensic Experts, .
What corrective actions has the company taken based on post-incident analysis ?
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: Oracle'S Ongoing Efforts To Address Flaws (Unspecified Patches), Industry Recommendations For Auditing Oracle Installations, Calls For Enhanced Regulatory Oversight On Enterprise Software Vendors, , Oracle Released Patch For Versions 12.2.3-12.2.14, , Applied Vendor-Provided Patches For The Vulnerability, Offered Identity Protection Services To Affected Individuals, .
Additional Questions
General Information
What was the amount of the last ransom demanded ?
Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was Likely (Clop's Standard Practice).
Who was the attacking group in the last incident ?
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident were an Clop (CL0P) Ransomware Gang, Cl0p ransomware gangFIN11, Clop ransomware group (suspected), CL0P Ransomware Group and Clop ransomware gang.
Incident Details
What was the most recent incident detected ?
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on 2025-10.
What was the most recent incident publicly disclosed ?
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on 2025-12-05.
What was the most recent incident resolved ?
Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on 2025-10-27.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the highest financial loss from an incident ?
Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was Victims suffered financial losses.
What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were Potential Internal Data, Financial Records (speculated), Operational Data (speculated), , , full names, bank account numbers, routing numbers, Social Security numbers (SSNs), tax and ID numbers, , Names, Social Security Numbers, Tax ID Numbers, Bank Account Numbers, Routing Numbers, , Personal data, including names, Social Security numbers, and banking information, Personal data of 9,720 individuals and Personal details of employees and high-profile individuals.
What was the most significant system affected in an incident ?
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident were Oracle E-Business Suite and Oracle E-Business Suite (versions 12.2.3-12.2.14) and Oracle E-Business Suite (HR, finance, supply chain modules) and Oracle E-Business Suite applications and and .
Response to the Incidents
What third-party assistance was involved in the most recent incident ?
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was forensic experts, .
What containment measures were taken in the most recent incident ?
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident was Applied patches for Oracle E-Business Suite vulnerability.
Data Breach Information
What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach were full names, Names, Social Security Numbers, Personal data, including names, Social Security numbers, and banking information, Social Security numbers (SSNs), tax and ID numbers, Bank Account Numbers, Personal data of 9,720 individuals, routing numbers, Personal details of employees and high-profile individuals, Operational Data (speculated), Tax ID Numbers, bank account numbers, Financial Records (speculated), Routing Numbers and Potential Internal Data.
What was the number of records exposed in the most significant breach ?
Number of Records Exposed in Most Significant Breach: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was 39.8K.
Ransomware Information
What was the highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident ?
Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was True.
Regulatory Compliance
What was the most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation ?
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was Class action lawsuit filed, Class action lawsuit, Lawsuit filed by former employee.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What was the most significant lesson learned from past incidents ?
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was Regulatory oversight for critical software vendors may need strengthening to address systemic risks.
What was the most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity ?
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was Implementation of multi-factor authentication for enterprise systems., Collaboration with cybersecurity firms (e.g., CloudSEK) for threat intelligence sharing., Monitor financial accounts and credit reports for suspicious activity, Enhance identity protection for employees (e.g., credit freezes, fraud alerts), Immediate patching of Oracle E-Business Suite vulnerabilities., Regular audits of Oracle installations and supply-chain security posture., Do not pay ransom demands (per law enforcement advice), Apply vendor patches promptly, Enroll in the provided 24 months of IDX identity protection services, Review third-party software vulnerabilities proactively, Apply patches for CVE-2025-61884 promptly, Hardened data security measures, Enhanced monitoring of third-party software dependencies., Development of incident response plans tailored to supply-chain attacks., Monitor for zero-day exploits in critical enterprise software and Monitor Oracle E-Business Suite for unauthorized access.
References
What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident are Cybernews, Washington Post Public Statement (via Reuters), CloudSEK Report (March 2025 Oracle Cloud Breach), Devdiscourse, Social Media (X/Twitter Posts), TechRadar, BleepingComputer, Cyber Incident Description, The Washington Post (notification letter to affected individuals), TechCrunch, Reuters, TechNadu, Politico and The Washington Post Breach Notification (Example).
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the most recent investigation ?
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is Ongoing (Limited Details Disclosed).
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
What was the most recent stakeholder advisory issued ?
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was Public Statements via Media (Reuters, TechCrunch), Law enforcement warnings against ransom payments, 12-month identity protection (IDX) offered to affected individuals, Notifications sent to affected employees/contractors and state regulators, .
What was the most recent customer advisory issued ?
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued were an The Washington Post public statement and Affected individuals notified via mail with guidance on identity protection.
Initial Access Broker
What was the most recent entry point used by an initial access broker ?
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker were an Vulnerability in Oracle E-Business Suite, Vulnerabilities in Oracle E-Business Suite, Oracle E-Business Suite zero-day (RCE) and Zero-day vulnerability in Oracle E-Business Suite (CVE-2025-61884).
What was the most recent reconnaissance period for an incident ?
Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was months (attacks occurred before patch release).
Post-Incident Analysis
What was the most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis ?
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was Zero-Day Exploits in Oracle E-Business SuiteSupply-Chain Dependency RisksDelayed Patching or Lack of Vulnerability Awareness, Unpatched zero-day vulnerability in Oracle E-Business SuiteDelayed patch application by victims, Unpatched zero-day vulnerability in Oracle E-Business SuiteLack of proactive monitoring for novel exploits, Exploitation of zero-day vulnerability in third-party software (Oracle E-Business Suite)Delayed detection (breach occurred July–August 2025, detected in September 2025), Failure to implement adequate and reasonable cybersecurity procedures and protocols, Failure to patch zero-day vulnerability in Oracle E-Business Suite (EBS).
What was the most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis ?
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was Oracle's Ongoing Efforts to Address Flaws (Unspecified Patches)Industry Recommendations for Auditing Oracle InstallationsCalls for Enhanced Regulatory Oversight on Enterprise Software Vendors, Oracle released patch for versions 12.2.3-12.2.14, Applied vendor-provided patches for the vulnerabilityOffered identity protection services to affected individuals.
.png)
Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)
Description
Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description
A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.
Description
A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.
Description
A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description
An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=washington-post-ripple' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
RapidWhat Do We Measure ?
Incident
Finding
Grade
Digital Assets
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Network Security
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
CMDB (Configuration Management Database)
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Threat Intelligence
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
