Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Warehouse StationeryWarehouse Stationery
VS
Ahold DelhaizeAhold Delhaize
Warehouse Stationery

Warehouse Stationery

26 The Warehouse Way, Auckland, undefined, 0632, NZ

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
757/1000Fair

As a member of the Warehouse Stationery team you will play the most important role in delivering ‘work, study, create and connect’ to our customers. We offer our customers a wide variety of product & services from Technology, Office Furniture, Art and Craft, Stationery,...

NAICS:452
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:407
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Ahold Delhaize

Ahold Delhaize

Ahold, Provincialeweg 11, 1506 MA Zaandam, NL

Last Update: 14/10/2026

View Profile
Between 600 and 649
http://www.aholddelhaize.com
649/1000Poor

Ahold Delhaize is one of the world’s largest food retail groups, we are a leader in supermarkets and e-commerce, and a company at the forefront of sustainable retailing. Our local brands employ around 393,000 associates in around 9,400 local grocery, small format, and s...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:84,256
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
5
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Warehouse Stationery

Warehouse Stationery

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Ahold Delhaize

Ahold Delhaize

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Warehouse Stationery in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

Ahold Delhaize has 390.2% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Warehouse Stationery (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Warehouse Stationery cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Ahold Delhaize (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ahold Delhaize cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Warehouse Stationery

Warehouse Stationery

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Ahold Delhaize

Ahold Delhaize

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
NETINTALBSTOCOOAHOLES1792002949
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
HANAHO1791910036
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
STOLIFETOAHO1791815396

FAQ

Between Warehouse Stationery company and Ahold Delhaize company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Warehouse Stationery company and Ahold Delhaize company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Warehouse Stationery company and Ahold Delhaize company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Warehouse Stationery company and Ahold Delhaize company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Warehouse Stationery company and Ahold Delhaize company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Warehouse Stationery company and Ahold Delhaize company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Warehouse Stationery company and Ahold Delhaize company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Warehouse Stationery company and Ahold Delhaize company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Warehouse Stationery company and Ahold Delhaize company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Warehouse Stationery company and Ahold Delhaize company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Warehouse Stationery company and Ahold Delhaize company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Warehouse Stationery and Ahold Delhaize, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Warehouse Stationery and Ahold Delhaize, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Warehouse Stationery or Ahold Delhaize ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Warehouse Stationery or Ahold Delhaize ?
Between Warehouse Stationery and Ahold Delhaize, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Warehouse Stationery and Ahold Delhaize, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89096
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in nfs-utils. An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending repeated state notification requests to an exposed rpc.statd service. The service fails to properly release memory allocated during callback processing, leading to continuous memory growth. Sustained requests can exhaust system resources, eventually causing the service to degrade or crash.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-89088
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow exists in libparted's file system resizing logic when handling FAT16 volumes. By convincing a user or administrator to resize a specially crafted FAT16 file system image with malformed directory metadata, an attacker can trigger an oversized read into a fixed-size memory buffer. This issue causes memory corruption, resulting in an application crash and a denial of service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-89085
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow can occur when processing a specially crafted FAT32 filesystem due to an integer calculation error during buffer allocation. A local attacker could exploit this by enticing a user or automated service to open a malicious filesystem image, resulting in an application crash leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential memory corruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-17591
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libarchive. An attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential information disclosure due to a use-after-free vulnerability, which occurs when a program reads memory that has already been released. This issue arises when the archive_entry_copy_mac_metadata() function deallocates an internal buffer before completing a data copy. An attacker who can supply input to an application utilizing this function can trigger the flaw to crash the application or read uninitialized memory data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-111802
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Nautilus. When a removable drive or disk image is unmounted or ejected, Nautilus prompts the user to empty the trash without verifying whether the trash directory paths are symbolic links. An attacker can exploit this flaw by tricking a user into mounting a crafted storage volume and confirming the prompt to empty the trash, leading to the arbitrary deletion of files accessible to that user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.3