Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Sixty years ago, Sam Walton started a single mom-and-pop shop and transformed it into the world’s biggest retailer. Since those founding days, one thing has remained consistent: our commitment to helping our customers save money so they can live better. Today, we’re reinventing the shopping experience and our associates are at the heart of it. When you join our Walmart family of brands, you’ll play a crucial role in shaping the future of retail, improving millions of lives around the world. We are ecstatic to have been named a Great Place to Work® Certified May 2023 – May 2024, Disability: IN 2023 Best Places to Work, and Fast Company 100 Best Workplaces for Innovators 2023. This is that place where your passions meet purpose. Join our


Walmart A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Walmart
Company Information
Website:https://walmart.wd5.myworkdayjobs.com/en-US/WalmartExternal
Employees number:588,210
Number of followers:5,047,312
NAICS:43
Industry Type:Retail
Homepage:https://walmart.wd5.myworkdayjobs.com/en-US/WalmartExternal
Walmart Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 800 and 849
logo
WalmartRetail
Updated:
19/06/2026
814/1000
Good
A
AaaAaABaaBaBCaaCaC
Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
Insurance prefers TPRM score to calculate premium
Walmart Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
logo
WalmartRetail
•••
Score locked
Instant access to detailed risk factors
Vulnerabilities
Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
Findings

Walmart
WalmartGood
Current Score
814A (GOOD)
01000
3 incidents
-17 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
JUNE 2026
814Before Incident
MAY 2026
815Before Incident
APRIL 2026
814Before Incident
MARCH 2026
830Before Incident
Breach
05 Mar 2026Walmart
DoorDash, Walmart, Woflow and Uber: ShinyHunters Claims Woflow Breach: What It Means for SaaS Supply Chain Security

ShinyHunters Allegedly Breaches Woflow, Highlighting Growing SaaS Supply Chain Risks

813After Incident
CRITICAL-17
WOFAUBWALDOO1772749980
ShinyHunters Allegedly Breaches Woflow, Highlighting Growing SaaS Supply Chain Risks The threat group ShinyHunters (tracked as UNC6040) has claimed responsibility for breaching Woflow, a third-party SaaS provider with reported customers including Uber, DoorDash, and Walmart. The attackers allege they exfiltrated hundreds of millions of records, though no public data sample has been released as of March 14, 2026, and Woflow has not issued a public response. This incident underscores a broader shift in SaaS attacks, where threat actors increasingly target integration-heavy vendors to gain downstream access to multiple enterprises. Rather than breaching organizations individually, attackers exploit OAuth tokens, API connections, and non-human identities to move laterally across interconnected SaaS ecosystems. Similar tactics were observed in previous breaches, such as the Salesloft/Drift and Salesforce attacks, reflecting a structural evolution in SaaS-focused cybercrime. ShinyHunters has refined a financially motivated playbook, leveraging trusted third-party integrations to compromise data at scale before publicly naming victims. In extortion-driven campaigns, attackers often provide proof of compromise directly to victims before releasing data, with delays potentially indicating ongoing negotiations. The group has previously set deadlines for data leaks, mirroring its 2025 Salesforce breach tactics claiming the breach, issuing ultimatums, and releasing data in waves to pressure targets. The attack surface for SaaS supply chain threats has expanded due to widespread reliance on OAuth permissions, API tokens, and service accounts. These integrations often operate with elevated privileges, creating persistent vulnerabilities. Over-permissioned OAuth scopes, long-lived tokens, and inherited permissions from privileged users further exacerbate risks, as traditional security controls like MFA and SSE solutions fail to address application-layer threats. A key challenge is the visibility gap in SaaS security. Many organizations assume sanctioned applications are secure after initial compliance audits, but dynamic SaaS environments where configurations, integrations, and permissions frequently change require continuous monitoring. Research indicates that 89% of compromised organizations believed they had adequate visibility at the time of an incident, highlighting the limitations of periodic audits. Integration-rich vendors are prime targets because a single compromise can provide access to multiple downstream enterprises. These vendors often aggregate sensitive data, maintain API access across tenants, and operate standardized integration models, making them efficient vectors for large-scale attacks. ShinyHunters has claimed over 1.5 billion records across hundreds of companies in past campaigns, demonstrating the financial incentive behind this approach. To mitigate such risks, security strategies must prioritize continuous SaaS posture management, strict governance of third-party OAuth permissions, and least-privilege enforcement for non-human identities. Short token lifetimes, rapid revocation mechanisms, and behavioral monitoring for anomalous activity are critical to detecting and preventing API-level breaches. As SaaS ecosystems grow more complex, organizations must shift from static compliance checks to operational, identity-centric security practices to address evolving supply chain threats.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Data Breach
MOTIVATION
Financial gain
IMPACT
Data Compromised: Hundreds of millions of records allegedly exfiltratedSystems Affected: SaaS supply chain integrations
DATA BREACH
Number Of Records Exposed: Hundreds of millions
FEBRUARY 2026
829Before Incident
JANUARY 2026
829Before Incident
DECEMBER 2025
829Before Incident
NOVEMBER 2025
828Before Incident
OCTOBER 2025
828Before Incident
SEPTEMBER 2025
828Before Incident
AUGUST 2025
827Before Incident
JULY 2025
827Before Incident
JANUARY 2024
837Before Incident
Breach
01 Jan 2024Walmart
Walmart Inc.

Walmart Inc. External System Breach

819After Incident
CRITICAL-18
WAL351072925
The Maine Attorney General's Office reported on February 23, 2024, that Walmart Inc. experienced an external system breach (hacking) affecting 204 individuals, including 1 Maine resident. The breach occurred between December 3, 2024, and February 5, 2024, and involved compromised Social Security Numbers. Walmart offered 24 months of identity theft protection services through Kroll, including identity theft and fraud monitoring services.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Data Breach
IMPACT
Social Security NumbersIdentity Theft Risk: High
DATA BREACH
Social Security NumbersSensitivity Of Data: HighSocial Security Numbers
SEPTEMBER 2020
859Before Incident
Breach
21 Sep 2020Walmart
Walmart

827After Incident
HIGH-32
WAL2572025102725
Walmart, the largest retailer and a major user of H-1B visas (employing ~2,390 visa holders), has paused hiring foreign workers requiring H-1B visas due to the Trump administration’s new $100,000 application fee per visa. This policy shift disrupts talent acquisition, particularly for corporate roles, and aligns with broader political pressure to prioritize domestic hiring. The move risks operational disruptions in specialized functions where foreign expertise was relied upon, potentially weakening innovation and competitiveness. While Walmart has not confirmed long-term impacts, the halt could lead to talent shortages in critical areas, force reliance on less experienced domestic hires, or push skilled workers to competitors or overseas markets. The financial burden of the fee—compounded by legal challenges from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce—adds regulatory uncertainty, further straining workforce planning. Critics argue the policy undermines the H-1B program’s intent to fill gaps in the U.S. labor market, while proponents claim it protects domestic jobs. The indirect consequences may include reputational damage among global talent pools and investors, signaling instability in U.S. immigration policies for skilled labor.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Policy/Regulatory Change (Non-Cyber, Operational Impact)
MOTIVATION
Economic protectionism; prioritizing domestic workforce over foreign labor under H-1B visa program.
IMPACT
Operational Impact: Hiring freeze for H-1B visa-dependent roles, affecting ~2,390 current visa holders and future candidates. Potential long-term talent acquisition challenges and innovation slowdown as warned by business leaders.Brand Reputation Impact: Potential negative perception among global talent pools and pro-immigration advocates; mixed reactions from domestic workforce advocates.Legal Liabilities: U.S. Chamber of Commerce lawsuit against the $100,000 fee, citing violation of the Immigration and Nationality Act.

Frequently Asked Questions

?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for Walmart ?
?
What was Walmart's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ?
?
What was Walmart's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ?
?
What was Walmart's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ?
?
What was Walmart's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ?
?
What was Walmart's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ?
?
What was Walmart's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ?
?
What was Walmart's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ?
?
What was Walmart's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ?
?
What was Walmart's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ?
?
What was Walmart's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in August 2025 ?
?
What was Walmart's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in July 2025 ?
?
What is the average per-incident point impact on Walmart's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ?
?
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with Walmart ?
?
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?
?
Where can I view Walmart's profile page on Rankiteo ?
?
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?