Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Wales Office/Swyddfa CymruWales Office/Swyddfa Cymru
VS
US Government Accountability OfficeUS Government Accountability Office
Wales Office/Swyddfa Cymru

Wales Office/Swyddfa Cymru

6 Central Square, Cardiff, Wales, GB, CF10 1EP

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.gov.uk/wales
758/1000Fair

The Office of the Secretary of State for Wales represents the face of the UK Government in Wales and the voice of Wales in Whitehall. Swyddfa Ysgrifennydd Gwladol Cymru yw wyneb Llywodraeth y DU yng Nghymru, a llais Cymru yn Whitehall.

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:44
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
US Government Accountability Office

US Government Accountability Office

441 G Street, N.W., Washington, 20548, US

Last Update: 28/09/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.gao.gov
674/1000Weak

For more information about GAO, please visit www.gao.gov. General Information The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) is an independent, nonpartisan agency that works for Congress. Often called the "congressional watchdog,"​ GAO investigates how the federal go...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:17,303
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Wales Office/Swyddfa Cymru

Wales Office/Swyddfa Cymru

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
US Government Accountability Office

US Government Accountability Office

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Wales Office/Swyddfa Cymru in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

US Government Accountability Office has 96.08% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Wales Office/Swyddfa Cymru (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Wales Office/Swyddfa Cymru cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - US Government Accountability Office (X = Date, Y = Severity)

US Government Accountability Office cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Wales Office/Swyddfa Cymru

Wales Office/Swyddfa Cymru

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
US Government Accountability Office

US Government Accountability Office

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
US-1790619948
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
US-1773483893
🔒 Incident : Breach
US-FOR1772821514

FAQ

Between Wales Office/Swyddfa Cymru company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Wales Office/Swyddfa Cymru company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Wales Office/Swyddfa Cymru company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Wales Office/Swyddfa Cymru company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Wales Office/Swyddfa Cymru company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Wales Office/Swyddfa Cymru company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Wales Office/Swyddfa Cymru company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Wales Office/Swyddfa Cymru company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Wales Office/Swyddfa Cymru company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Wales Office/Swyddfa Cymru company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Wales Office/Swyddfa Cymru company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Wales Office/Swyddfa Cymru and US Government Accountability Office, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Wales Office/Swyddfa Cymru and US Government Accountability Office, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Wales Office/Swyddfa Cymru or US Government Accountability Office ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Wales Office/Swyddfa Cymru or US Government Accountability Office ?
Between Wales Office/Swyddfa Cymru and US Government Accountability Office, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Wales Office/Swyddfa Cymru and US Government Accountability Office, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-113705
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was determined in a2aproject a2a-rs up to 0.4.3. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file a2a-server/src/error.rs. Executing a manipulation can lead to information exposure through error message. The attack can be executed remotely. This patch is called 713b943af94ab2d521d483b841618b97a2e78a4d. A patch should be applied to remediate this issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-9825
SUMMARY

IBM Cyber Fraud 1.0.0 through 1.0.2 has a missing secure attribute allowing sensitive cookies to be transmitted over unencrypted connections, potentially enabling an attacker to intercept session data through network-based attacks.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-94402
SUMMARY

IBM Carbon Charts 0.4.0 through 1.27.19 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. The MeterChart component's Title.truncateTitle() function re-inserts a substring of user-supplied label text into the DOM via an unsanitized innerHTML write when the title exceeds the available container width. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the victim's browser session.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-93888
SUMMARY

IBM Sterling Connect Direct for Unix 6.4.0.0 through 6.4.0.6 and 6.3.0.0 through 6.3.0.7 apnotify utility is vulnerable to a code injection due to insufficient validation of user input.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-93744
SUMMARY

IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow an unathenticated remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper access control. By sending a specially crafted HTTP request to any URL within the Navigator application prior to authentication, a bad actor could exploit this vulnerability to alter server-side session security state.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9