Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Wagner PartsWagner Parts
VS
AutolivAutoliv
Wagner Parts

Wagner Parts

N/A

Last Update: 30/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.wagnerbrake.com/
747/1000Moderate

NAICS:3363
NAICS Definition:Motor Vehicle Parts Manufacturing
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Autoliv

Autoliv

World Trade Center, Stockholm, SE- 111 64, SE

Last Update: 22/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.autoliv.com
770/1000Fair

Autoliv, Inc. is the worldwide leader in automotive safety systems. We develop, manufacture and market protective systems, such as airbags, seatbelts, steering wheels and pedestrian protection systems for all major automotive manufacturers in the world. Our products sav...

NAICS:3363
NAICS Definition:Motor Vehicle Parts Manufacturing
Employees:17,968
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Wagner Parts

Wagner Parts

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Autoliv

Autoliv

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Parts Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Wagner Parts in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Parts Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Autoliv in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Wagner Parts (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Wagner Parts cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Autoliv (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Autoliv cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Wagner Parts

Wagner Parts

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Autoliv

Autoliv

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Wagner Parts company and Autoliv company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Wagner Parts company and Autoliv company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Wagner Parts company and Autoliv company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Wagner Parts company and Autoliv company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Wagner Parts company and Autoliv company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Wagner Parts company and Autoliv company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Wagner Parts company and Autoliv company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Wagner Parts company and Autoliv company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Wagner Parts company and Autoliv company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Wagner Parts company and Autoliv company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Wagner Parts company and Autoliv company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Wagner Parts and Autoliv, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Wagner Parts and Autoliv, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Wagner Parts or Autoliv ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Wagner Parts or Autoliv ?
Between Wagner Parts and Autoliv, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Wagner Parts and Autoliv, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66339
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libsoup. After a CONNECT tunnel is established through an HTTP proxy, libsoup incorrectly attaches the Proxy-Authorization header to subsequent HTTPS requests sent through that tunnel to the destination server. This allows the destination server to capture proxy credentials, leading to information disclosure.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-66338
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libsoup. The chunked transfer encoding parser uses a permissive parsing function for chunk sizes that silently accepts inputs violating RFC 9112, including leading whitespace, plus sign prefixes, and trailing invalid characters. When libsoup operates behind a strict frontend proxy, this parsing differential can be exploited to smuggle HTTP requests.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-66337
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libsoup. An unsigned integer underflow in the soup_filter_input_stream_read_until() function causes a heap buffer over-read when parsing multipart HTTP responses. A malicious HTTP server can exploit this by sending a crafted multipart response, potentially causing the client application to crash or disclose sensitive heap memory.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-61892
SUMMARY

Weintek cMT3092X HMI allows a non-privileged user to modify tokens to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-61886
SUMMARY

Weintek cMT3092X HMI stores user account passwords in plaintext.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8