Comparison Overview
Waffle House, Inc.
Waffle House, Inc.
5986 Financial Dr NW, Norcross, 30071, US
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Waffle House has been serving Good Food Fast® since 1955. We started in one restaurant serving Avondale Estates, GA, and then grew into a national brand with more than 1,900 restaurants in 25 states providing career paths to 40,000 + employees. The love and devotion o...
Red Robin
6312 S. Fiddler's Green Circle, Suite 200 North, Greenwood Village, CO, US, 80111
Last Update: 19/07/2026
Since opening in 1969 in Seattle, Washington, Red Robin has welcomed Guests to our casual dining restaurants in the U.S. and Canada, connecting people around craveable food and fun in a relaxed, playful atmosphere. Our people are the foundation of our success. We aim t...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Waffle House, Inc.
Red Robin
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Waffle House, Inc. in 2026.
Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Red Robin in 2026.
Incident History - Waffle House, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Waffle House, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Red Robin (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Red Robin cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Waffle House, Inc.
Red Robin
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A security vulnerability has been detected in adafap api-mcp up to 92b9a5d04acfec165c7d4ef852496593aa87be06. This affects the function customAxios of the file app/api/proxy/route.ts of the component Proxy API Endpoint. The manipulation of the argument url leads to server-side request forgery. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. This product adopts a rolling release strategy to maintain continuous delivery. Therefore, version details for affected or updated releases cannot be specified. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
A weakness has been identified in PhialsBasement KoboldCPP-MCP-Server 1.0.0. Affected by this issue is the function makeRequest of the file src/index.ts of the component BaseConfigSchema. Executing a manipulation of the argument apiUrl can lead to server-side request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack on the local host. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
A security flaw has been discovered in Handwriting-OCR handwriting-ocr-mcp-server 0.1.0. Affected by this vulnerability is the function fs.readFileSync of the file src/index.ts of the component upload_document. Performing a manipulation of the argument File results in path traversal. Attacking locally is a requirement. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
A vulnerability was identified in Nikolaibibo claude-comfyui-mcp 1.0.0. Affected is the function copyFileSync of the file src/tools/utils.ts of the component comfy_upload_image. Such manipulation of the argument image_path leads to path traversal. An attack has to be approached locally. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in nltk/nltk versions 3.9.4 and the current develop branch. The `nltk.pathsec.validate_network_url()` function, intended to prevent SSRF by rejecting internal network addresses, fails to reject IPs in the RFC 6598 shared address space (`100.64.0.0/10`). This occurs because Python's `ipaddress` module does not classify such addresses as `is_private` or `is_global`, and the current guard only checks `is_private` and a few explicit categories. An attacker who can influence a URL passed to NLTK's network-loading helpers can exploit this vulnerability to make a strict-mode application send requests to shared-address-space hosts, potentially exposing non-public infrastructure reachable from the application host. The impact is limited to SSRF-style confidentiality exposure, with no code execution claimed.