Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Andy Hill Cancer Research Endowment (CARE) FundAndy Hill Cancer Research Endowment (CARE) Fund
VS
DFL StiftungDFL Stiftung
Andy Hill Cancer Research Endowment (CARE) Fund

Andy Hill Cancer Research Endowment (CARE) Fund

Bothell, 98041, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.wacarefund.org/
753/1000Fair

The Andy Hill Cancer Research Endowment (CARE) Fund was created in 2015 to promote and invest in cancer research to improve the quality of life for the people of Washington. The Fund’s objectives are to optimize the use of public funds to prioritize research with the ...

NAICS:525
NAICS Definition:Funds, Trusts, and Other Financial Vehicles
Employees:8
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
DFL Stiftung

DFL Stiftung

Eschersheimer Landstraße 14, Frankfurt am Main, 60322, DE

Last Update: 05/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.dfl-stiftung.de
753/1000Fair

Established on the initiative of the DFL Deutsche Fußball Liga e.V. and the DFL GmbH, the DFL Foundation is an umbrella organisation for the various social activities of the 36 clubs and corporations of the Bundesliga and Bundesliga 2 since its founding in 2008. Focused...

NAICS:525
NAICS Definition:Funds, Trusts, and Other Financial Vehicles
Employees:22
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Andy Hill Cancer Research Endowment (CARE) Fund

Andy Hill Cancer Research Endowment (CARE) Fund

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
DFL Stiftung

DFL Stiftung

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Funds and Trusts Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Andy Hill Cancer Research Endowment (CARE) Fund in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Funds and Trusts Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DFL Stiftung in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Andy Hill Cancer Research Endowment (CARE) Fund (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Andy Hill Cancer Research Endowment (CARE) Fund cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - DFL Stiftung (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DFL Stiftung cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Andy Hill Cancer Research Endowment (CARE) Fund

Andy Hill Cancer Research Endowment (CARE) Fund

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
DFL Stiftung

DFL Stiftung

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Andy Hill Cancer Research Endowment (CARE) Fund company and DFL Stiftung company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Andy Hill Cancer Research Endowment (CARE) Fund company and DFL Stiftung company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Andy Hill Cancer Research Endowment (CARE) Fund company and DFL Stiftung company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Andy Hill Cancer Research Endowment (CARE) Fund company and DFL Stiftung company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Andy Hill Cancer Research Endowment (CARE) Fund company and DFL Stiftung company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Andy Hill Cancer Research Endowment (CARE) Fund company and DFL Stiftung company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Andy Hill Cancer Research Endowment (CARE) Fund company and DFL Stiftung company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Andy Hill Cancer Research Endowment (CARE) Fund company and DFL Stiftung company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Andy Hill Cancer Research Endowment (CARE) Fund company and DFL Stiftung company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Andy Hill Cancer Research Endowment (CARE) Fund company and DFL Stiftung company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Andy Hill Cancer Research Endowment (CARE) Fund company and DFL Stiftung company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Andy Hill Cancer Research Endowment (CARE) Fund and DFL Stiftung, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Andy Hill Cancer Research Endowment (CARE) Fund and DFL Stiftung, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Andy Hill Cancer Research Endowment (CARE) Fund or DFL Stiftung ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Andy Hill Cancer Research Endowment (CARE) Fund or DFL Stiftung ?
Between Andy Hill Cancer Research Endowment (CARE) Fund and DFL Stiftung, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Andy Hill Cancer Research Endowment (CARE) Fund and DFL Stiftung, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-56078
SUMMARY

PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-18
UPDATED
Date2026-06-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56077
SUMMARY

PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-18
UPDATED
Date2026-06-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56076
SUMMARY

PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-18
UPDATED
Date2026-06-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56075
SUMMARY

PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-18
UPDATED
Date2026-06-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56074
SUMMARY

PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-18
UPDATED
Date2026-06-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8