Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

EyeconicEyeconic
VS
Ross Stores, Inc.Ross Stores, Inc.
Eyeconic

Eyeconic

None, None, Sacramento , CA, US, None

Last Update: 28/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.eyeconic.com/
770/1000Fair

Eyeconic® was founded in 2011 by VSP®, a not-for-profit organization. Our roots in vision care make your overall eye health and wellness a priority. The same level of care goes into every pair of high-quality eyewear and contacts we sell. It’s our mission to help you f...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:129
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Ross Stores, Inc.

Ross Stores, Inc.

5130 Hacienda Drive, Dublin, CA, US, 94568

Last Update: 03/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://jobs.rossstores.com/
835/1000Good

For the last 40+ years, Ross Stores, Inc. has grown from a six-store chain into an $21.1 billion, Fortune 500 Company. We operate our off-price businesses in a way that keeps costs low so we can pass the savings to our customers. We continue to open new stores and our s...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:40,653
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Eyeconic

Eyeconic

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Ross Stores, Inc.

Ross Stores, Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Eyeconic in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ross Stores, Inc. in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Eyeconic (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Eyeconic cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Ross Stores, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ross Stores, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Eyeconic

Eyeconic

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Ross Stores, Inc.

Ross Stores, Inc.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Eyeconic company and Ross Stores, Inc. company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Eyeconic company and Ross Stores, Inc. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Eyeconic company and Ross Stores, Inc. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Eyeconic company and Ross Stores, Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Eyeconic company and Ross Stores, Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Eyeconic company and Ross Stores, Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Eyeconic company and Ross Stores, Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Eyeconic company and Ross Stores, Inc. company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Eyeconic company and Ross Stores, Inc. company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Eyeconic company and Ross Stores, Inc. company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Eyeconic company and Ross Stores, Inc. company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Eyeconic and Ross Stores, Inc., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Eyeconic and Ross Stores, Inc., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Eyeconic or Ross Stores, Inc. ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Eyeconic or Ross Stores, Inc. ?
Between Eyeconic and Ross Stores, Inc., which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Eyeconic and Ross Stores, Inc., which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8