Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

VRM Digital CommunicationsVRM Digital Communications
VS
FanaticsFanatics
VRM Digital Communications

VRM Digital Communications

Erich-Dombrowski-Straße 2, Mainz Marienborn, 55127, DE

Last Update: 15/12/2025

View Profile
764/1000Fair

VRM Digital Communications ist eine Full-Service-Agentur mit Begeisterung für intelligentes Marketing, zeitgemäße Digital-Lösungen und erfolgreiche digitale Projekte. Wir sind Experten für einzigartiges Design und die technisch einwandfreie Realisierung von Corporate We...

NAICS:513
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:2
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Fanatics

Fanatics

95 Morton St, New York, 10014, US

Last Update: 14/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.fanaticsinc.com
800/1000Good

Fanatics is committed to relentlessly enhancing the fan experience. As a leading global sports platform, Fanatics allows fans to buy, bet, and collect while engaging with sports in deeper, more immersive ways. Fanatics is redefining how fans connect with their favorit...

NAICS:513
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:14,652
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
VRM Digital Communications

VRM Digital Communications

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Fanatics

Fanatics

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for VRM Digital Communications in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fanatics in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - VRM Digital Communications (X = Date, Y = Severity)

VRM Digital Communications cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Fanatics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fanatics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
VRM Digital Communications

VRM Digital Communications

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Fanatics

Fanatics

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between VRM Digital Communications company and Fanatics company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between VRM Digital Communications company and Fanatics company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between VRM Digital Communications company and Fanatics company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between VRM Digital Communications company and Fanatics company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between VRM Digital Communications company and Fanatics company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between VRM Digital Communications company and Fanatics company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between VRM Digital Communications company and Fanatics company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between VRM Digital Communications company and Fanatics company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between VRM Digital Communications company and Fanatics company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between VRM Digital Communications company and Fanatics company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between VRM Digital Communications company and Fanatics company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between VRM Digital Communications and Fanatics, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between VRM Digital Communications and Fanatics, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - VRM Digital Communications or Fanatics ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - VRM Digital Communications or Fanatics ?
Between VRM Digital Communications and Fanatics, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between VRM Digital Communications and Fanatics, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97032
SUMMARY

HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97031
SUMMARY

Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97030
SUMMARY

A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96207
SUMMARY

Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94510
SUMMARY

Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
5.3
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9