Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Visiting Physician Services (VPS)Visiting Physician Services (VPS)
VS
BrightSpring Health ServicesBrightSpring Health Services
Visiting Physician Services (VPS)

Visiting Physician Services (VPS)

Based in Neptune, New Jersey. We serve Bergen, Passaic, Essex, Union, Middlesex, Eastern Somerset, Monmouth, and Ocean Counties., US

Last Update: 18/03/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://vnahg.org/vps
696/1000Weak

Visiting Physician Services (VPS) is a home-based primary care practice with over 30 years of experience bringing compassionate medical care directly to older adults and homebound patients. By delivering care through house calls, VPS ensures patients live comfortably an...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:2
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
BrightSpring Health Services

BrightSpring Health Services

805 N Whittington Pkwy, Louisville, 40222, US

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
746/1000Moderate

BrightSpring is the parent company of a family of services and brands that provides clinical, nonclinical, pharmacy and ancillary care services for people of all ages, health and skill levels across home and community settings. The company is a leading provider of div...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:11,976
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Visiting Physician Services (VPS)

Visiting Physician Services (VPS)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
BrightSpring Health Services

BrightSpring Health Services

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

Visiting Physician Services (VPS) has 28.57% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BrightSpring Health Services in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Visiting Physician Services (VPS) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Visiting Physician Services (VPS) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - BrightSpring Health Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BrightSpring Health Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Visiting Physician Services (VPS)

Visiting Physician Services (VPS)

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
VPS1773853243
BrightSpring Health Services

BrightSpring Health Services

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
BRI1025072825

FAQ

Between Visiting Physician Services (VPS) company and BrightSpring Health Services company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Visiting Physician Services (VPS) company and BrightSpring Health Services company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Visiting Physician Services (VPS) company and BrightSpring Health Services company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Visiting Physician Services (VPS) company and BrightSpring Health Services company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Visiting Physician Services (VPS) company and BrightSpring Health Services company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Visiting Physician Services (VPS) company and BrightSpring Health Services company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Visiting Physician Services (VPS) company and BrightSpring Health Services company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Visiting Physician Services (VPS) company and BrightSpring Health Services company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Visiting Physician Services (VPS) company and BrightSpring Health Services company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Visiting Physician Services (VPS) company and BrightSpring Health Services company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Visiting Physician Services (VPS) company and BrightSpring Health Services company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Visiting Physician Services (VPS) and BrightSpring Health Services, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Visiting Physician Services (VPS) and BrightSpring Health Services, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Visiting Physician Services (VPS) or BrightSpring Health Services ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Visiting Physician Services (VPS) or BrightSpring Health Services ?
Between Visiting Physician Services (VPS) and BrightSpring Health Services, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Visiting Physician Services (VPS) and BrightSpring Health Services, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-63261
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A low-privileged authenticated user can send a specially crafted request to a Kibana machine learning feature, causing the server to exhaust available memory and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63260
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated attacker with low-privilege access can trigger a denial of service condition in Kibana by sending a specially crafted, oversized request payload. Processing this user-supplied input requires resource-intensive memory allocation that can exhaust the available heap memory in the Kibana process, causing it to crash and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63259
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via user-supplied identifiers that reference scheduled query result data from Kibana Spaces the requester is not authorized to access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63145
SUMMARY

Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to integrity compromise of Machine Learning audit and notification records via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A vulnerability exists in Kibana's Machine Learning functionality where a Machine Learning management endpoint performs an insufficient authorization check. The endpoint validates only a coarse privilege level but does not verify that the requesting user has access to the specific Machine Learning job or notification resources provided in the request. As a result, a low-privileged user with Machine Learning access in any Kibana space can manipulate Machine Learning audit and notification records for arbitrary jobs—including jobs in other spaces or belonging to other users—by leveraging Kibana's internally elevated credentials to write to restricted Machine Learning system indices that the user cannot access directly.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63144
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can lead to denial of service via a specially crafted search request submitted by a low-privileged authenticated user. A user with read-level index access can submit a request that triggers unbounded recursive processing within the Elasticsearch query evaluation component, causing a fatal error that terminates the affected node. In single-node deployments, this results in complete service outage; in multi-node clusters, it causes repeated node restarts and sustained availability degradation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8