Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Voyageurs du Monde SchweizVoyageurs du Monde Schweiz
VS
Royal Caribbean GroupRoyal Caribbean Group
Voyageurs du Monde Schweiz

Voyageurs du Monde Schweiz

Löwenstrasse 11, Zürich, 8001, CH

Last Update: 04/06/2026

View Profile
759/1000Fair

Voyageurs du Monde ist seit 1979 auf massgeschneiderte Reisen spezialisiert. Die Reisen, die sich durch Originalität, Erfahrung, höchste Qualität und authentische kulturelle Begegnungen auszeichnen, werden von einem Team aus 300 Reiseberatern konzipiert – allesamt Exper...

NAICS:5615
NAICS Definition:Travel Arrangement and Reservation Services
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Royal Caribbean Group

Royal Caribbean Group

Royal Caribbean Group 1050 Caribbean Way Miami, Miami, Florida, US, 2312

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
813/1000Good

At Royal Caribbean Group, we deliver unforgettable vacations to guests who trust us with life’s greatest moments. We build the best ships, and even better careers, all while doing the right thing. We are passionate. We are innovative. We are unstoppable. We open the wor...

NAICS:5615
NAICS Definition:Travel Arrangement and Reservation Services
Employees:44,482
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Voyageurs du Monde Schweiz

Voyageurs du Monde Schweiz

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Royal Caribbean Group

Royal Caribbean Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Travel Arrangements Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Voyageurs du Monde Schweiz in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Travel Arrangements Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Royal Caribbean Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Voyageurs du Monde Schweiz (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Voyageurs du Monde Schweiz cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Royal Caribbean Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Royal Caribbean Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Voyageurs du Monde Schweiz

Voyageurs du Monde Schweiz

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Royal Caribbean Group

Royal Caribbean Group

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
ROY1011090725

FAQ

Between Voyageurs du Monde Schweiz company and Royal Caribbean Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Voyageurs du Monde Schweiz company and Royal Caribbean Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Voyageurs du Monde Schweiz company and Royal Caribbean Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Voyageurs du Monde Schweiz company and Royal Caribbean Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Voyageurs du Monde Schweiz company and Royal Caribbean Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Voyageurs du Monde Schweiz company and Royal Caribbean Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Voyageurs du Monde Schweiz company and Royal Caribbean Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Voyageurs du Monde Schweiz company and Royal Caribbean Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Voyageurs du Monde Schweiz company and Royal Caribbean Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Voyageurs du Monde Schweiz company and Royal Caribbean Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Voyageurs du Monde Schweiz company and Royal Caribbean Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Voyageurs du Monde Schweiz and Royal Caribbean Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Voyageurs du Monde Schweiz and Royal Caribbean Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Voyageurs du Monde Schweiz or Royal Caribbean Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Voyageurs du Monde Schweiz or Royal Caribbean Group ?
Between Voyageurs du Monde Schweiz and Royal Caribbean Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Voyageurs du Monde Schweiz and Royal Caribbean Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1