Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Voyageurs du Monde SchweizVoyageurs du Monde Schweiz
VS
Avis Budget GroupAvis Budget Group
Voyageurs du Monde Schweiz

Voyageurs du Monde Schweiz

Löwenstrasse 11, Zürich, 8001, CH

Last Update: 04/06/2026

View Profile
759/1000Fair

Voyageurs du Monde ist seit 1979 auf massgeschneiderte Reisen spezialisiert. Die Reisen, die sich durch Originalität, Erfahrung, höchste Qualität und authentische kulturelle Begegnungen auszeichnen, werden von einem Team aus 300 Reiseberatern konzipiert – allesamt Exper...

NAICS:5615
NAICS Definition:Travel Arrangement and Reservation Services
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Avis Budget Group

Avis Budget Group

6 Sylvan Way, Parsippany, 07054, US

Last Update: 24/05/2026

View Profile
650/1000Weak

Avis Budget Group, Inc. is a leading global provider of transportation solutions, both through its Avis and Budget brands, which have more than 11,000 rental locations in approximately 180 countries around the world, and through its Zipcar brand, which is the world's le...

NAICS:5615
NAICS Definition:Travel Arrangement and Reservation Services
Employees:18,117
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Voyageurs du Monde Schweiz

Voyageurs du Monde Schweiz

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Avis Budget Group

Avis Budget Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Travel Arrangements Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Voyageurs du Monde Schweiz in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Travel Arrangements Industry Avg (This Year)

Avis Budget Group has 4.76% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Voyageurs du Monde Schweiz (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Voyageurs du Monde Schweiz cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Avis Budget Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Avis Budget Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Voyageurs du Monde Schweiz

Voyageurs du Monde Schweiz

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Avis Budget Group

Avis Budget Group

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
AVI1779603892
🔒 Incident : Breach
AVI337072525
🔒 Incident : Breach
AVI656072725

FAQ

Between Voyageurs du Monde Schweiz company and Avis Budget Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Voyageurs du Monde Schweiz company and Avis Budget Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Voyageurs du Monde Schweiz company and Avis Budget Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Voyageurs du Monde Schweiz company and Avis Budget Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Voyageurs du Monde Schweiz company and Avis Budget Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Voyageurs du Monde Schweiz company and Avis Budget Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Voyageurs du Monde Schweiz company and Avis Budget Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Voyageurs du Monde Schweiz company and Avis Budget Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Voyageurs du Monde Schweiz company and Avis Budget Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Voyageurs du Monde Schweiz company and Avis Budget Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Voyageurs du Monde Schweiz company and Avis Budget Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Voyageurs du Monde Schweiz and Avis Budget Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Voyageurs du Monde Schweiz and Avis Budget Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Voyageurs du Monde Schweiz or Avis Budget Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Voyageurs du Monde Schweiz or Avis Budget Group ?
Between Voyageurs du Monde Schweiz and Avis Budget Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Voyageurs du Monde Schweiz and Avis Budget Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2