Comparison Overview

Volvo Group

VS

BYD

Volvo Group

Gropegårdsgatan 2, Göteborg, SE, 417 15
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 0 and 549
https://www.volvogroup.com

The Volvo Group is one of the world’s leading manufacturers of trucks, buses, construction equipment and marine and industrial engines. The Group also provides complete solutions for financing and service. The Volvo Group, with its headquarters in Gothenburg, employs about 100,000 people, has production facilities in 18 countries and sells its products in more than 190 markets.

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 77,329
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
3
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2
View Profile

BYD

No.3009, BYD Road, Pingshan, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518118, CN
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849
http://www.bydglobal.com

Established in 1995, BYD is a top high-tech enterprise in China specializing in IT, automobile, and new energy.BYD is the largest supplier of rechargeable batteries in the globe, and has the largest market share for Nickel-cadmium batteries, handset Li-ion batteries, cell-phone chargers and keypads worldwide. It also has the second largest market share for cell-phone shells in the globe. BYD Auto becomes the most innovative independent national auto brand and leads the field of electric vehicles with unique technologies. In the field of new energy, BYD has developed green products such as solar farm, battery energy storage station, electric vehicle, and LED, etc. It will continue to lead the new energy revolution in the world!

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 15,445
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/volvo-group.jpeg
Volvo Group
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/byd.jpeg
BYD
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Volvo Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
BYD
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

Volvo Group has 400.0% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BYD in 2025.

Incident History — Volvo Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Volvo Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — BYD (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BYD cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/volvo-group.jpeg
Volvo Group
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: financial (ransomware)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: ransomware
Motivation: financial (ransomware)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: third-party vendor compromise
Motivation: financial (presumed, based on ransomware attack)
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/byd.jpeg
BYD
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

BYD company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Volvo Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Volvo Group company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas BYD company has not reported any.

In the current year, Volvo Group company has reported more cyber incidents than BYD company.

Volvo Group company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while BYD company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Volvo Group company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other BYD company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither BYD company nor Volvo Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Volvo Group company nor BYD company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Volvo Group nor BYD holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Volvo Group company nor BYD company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Volvo Group company employs more people globally than BYD company, reflecting its scale as a Motor Vehicle Manufacturing.

Neither Volvo Group nor BYD holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Volvo Group nor BYD holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Volvo Group nor BYD holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Volvo Group nor BYD holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Volvo Group nor BYD holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Volvo Group nor BYD holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References