Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Volkswagen Financial Services | BrazilVolkswagen Financial Services | Brazil
VS
Grupo SalinasGrupo Salinas
Volkswagen Financial Services | Brazil

Volkswagen Financial Services | Brazil

Rua Volkswagen, 291 - Parque Jabaquara, São Paulo, 04344-020, BR

Last Update: 19/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.vwfs.com.br
760/1000Fair

A Volkswagen Financial Services é responsável pelas operações financeiras do Grupo Volkswagen em todo o mundo. No Brasil, o conglomerado é constituído pelo Banco Volkswagen, Consórcio Nacional Volkswagen e Volkswagen Corretora de Seguros. Somos o maior banco de montador...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:791
Subsidiaries:36
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Grupo Salinas

Grupo Salinas

MX

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.gruposalinas.com
793/1000Fair

Grupo Salinas es un conjunto de empresas dinámicas, que se caracterizan por la evolución constante y la innovación, enfocadas en la creación de valor económico, social y ambiental. Estamos en industrias diversas como comercio especializado, servicios financieros, tele...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:25,796
Subsidiaries:17
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Volkswagen Financial Services | Brazil

Volkswagen Financial Services | Brazil

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Grupo Salinas

Grupo Salinas

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Volkswagen Financial Services | Brazil in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Grupo Salinas in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Volkswagen Financial Services | Brazil (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Volkswagen Financial Services | Brazil cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Grupo Salinas (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Grupo Salinas cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Volkswagen Financial Services | Brazil

Volkswagen Financial Services | Brazil

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Grupo Salinas

Grupo Salinas

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Volkswagen Financial Services | Brazil company and Grupo Salinas company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Volkswagen Financial Services | Brazil company and Grupo Salinas company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Volkswagen Financial Services | Brazil company and Grupo Salinas company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Volkswagen Financial Services | Brazil company and Grupo Salinas company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Volkswagen Financial Services | Brazil company and Grupo Salinas company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Volkswagen Financial Services | Brazil company and Grupo Salinas company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Volkswagen Financial Services | Brazil company and Grupo Salinas company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Volkswagen Financial Services | Brazil company and Grupo Salinas company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Volkswagen Financial Services | Brazil company and Grupo Salinas company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Volkswagen Financial Services | Brazil company and Grupo Salinas company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Volkswagen Financial Services | Brazil company and Grupo Salinas company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Volkswagen Financial Services | Brazil and Grupo Salinas, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Volkswagen Financial Services | Brazil and Grupo Salinas, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Volkswagen Financial Services | Brazil or Grupo Salinas ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Volkswagen Financial Services | Brazil or Grupo Salinas ?
Between Volkswagen Financial Services | Brazil and Grupo Salinas, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Volkswagen Financial Services | Brazil and Grupo Salinas, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1