Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Volker Staal en FunderingenVolker Staal en Funderingen
VS
EgisEgis
Volker Staal en Funderingen

Volker Staal en Funderingen

Donker Duyvisweg 75, Dordrecht, Zuid-Holland, 3316, NL

Last Update: 23/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.vsf.nl
756/1000Fair

For many years, Volker Staal en Funderingen (VSF) has worked in the steel fabrication and foundation sectors in Europe. The company specialises in heavy and complex steel structures and foundation techniques. VSF, and its parent company, infrastructure specialist Van ...

NAICS:237
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:319
Subsidiaries:73
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Egis

Egis

15 avenue du Centre, Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines , 78286, FR

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.egis-group.com
798/1000Fair

Egis is a leading global architectural, consulting, construction engineering, operations and mobility services firm. We create and operate intelligent infrastructure and buildings that both respond to the climate emergency and contribute to balanced, sustainable and res...

NAICS:237
NAICS Definition:Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
Employees:14,401
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Volker Staal en Funderingen

Volker Staal en Funderingen

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Egis

Egis

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Civil Engineering Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Volker Staal en Funderingen in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Civil Engineering Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Egis in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Volker Staal en Funderingen (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Volker Staal en Funderingen cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Egis (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Egis cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Volker Staal en Funderingen

Volker Staal en Funderingen

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Egis

Egis

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Volker Staal en Funderingen company and Egis company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Volker Staal en Funderingen company and Egis company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Volker Staal en Funderingen company and Egis company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Volker Staal en Funderingen company and Egis company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Volker Staal en Funderingen company and Egis company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Volker Staal en Funderingen company and Egis company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Volker Staal en Funderingen company and Egis company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Volker Staal en Funderingen company and Egis company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Volker Staal en Funderingen company and Egis company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Volker Staal en Funderingen company and Egis company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Volker Staal en Funderingen company and Egis company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Volker Staal en Funderingen and Egis, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Volker Staal en Funderingen and Egis, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Volker Staal en Funderingen or Egis ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Volker Staal en Funderingen or Egis ?
Between Volker Staal en Funderingen and Egis, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Volker Staal en Funderingen and Egis, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2