Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Vodafone Business AustraliaVodafone Business Australia
VS
Zain GroupZain Group
Vodafone Business Australia

Vodafone Business Australia

Barangaroo, AU

Last Update: 23/08/2026

View Profile
723/1000Moderate

Vodafone Business powers the growth of your business. We’re passionate about helping you grow with connectivity you can count on - simple, reliable, and built to perform. We keep you connected to your team and closer to your customers, with solutions designed to move ...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:145
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Zain Group

Zain Group

Airport Road, P.O. Box 22244, Kuwait, KW

Last Update: 07/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.zain.com
776/1000Fair

Zain Group is a leading provider of innovative ICT technologies & digital lifestyle communications operating in 8 markets across the Middle East & Africa, serving 51.3 million active customers as of 30 September 2025. Zain provides mobile voice, data and B2B services in...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:16,153
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Vodafone Business Australia

Vodafone Business Australia

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Zain Group

Zain Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

Vodafone Business Australia has 48.72% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Zain Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Vodafone Business Australia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Vodafone Business Australia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Zain Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Zain Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Vodafone Business Australia

Vodafone Business Australia

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
MCDCITSHEVODVERATTGITCURAUSVMW1787509645
Zain Group

Zain Group

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
ZAI2703327102325

FAQ

Between Vodafone Business Australia company and Zain Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Vodafone Business Australia company and Zain Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Vodafone Business Australia company and Zain Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Vodafone Business Australia company and Zain Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Vodafone Business Australia company and Zain Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Vodafone Business Australia company and Zain Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Vodafone Business Australia company and Zain Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Vodafone Business Australia company and Zain Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Vodafone Business Australia company and Zain Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Vodafone Business Australia company and Zain Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Vodafone Business Australia company and Zain Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Vodafone Business Australia and Zain Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Vodafone Business Australia and Zain Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Vodafone Business Australia or Zain Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Vodafone Business Australia or Zain Group ?
Between Vodafone Business Australia and Zain Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Vodafone Business Australia and Zain Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8