Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Vodafone Procure & ConnectVodafone Procure & Connect
VS
AT&TAT&T
Vodafone Procure & Connect

Vodafone Procure & Connect

15, Rue Edward Steichen, Luxembourg, L-2540, LU

Last Update: 26/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.vodafone.com/procureandconnect
757/1000Fair

What happens when a world-class procurement organisation joins forces with a global leader in voice and roaming? Vodafone Procure & Connect is born, multiplying the value we offer, and creating a unique new force in the industry, with even greater scale, and richer col...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:20
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
AT&T

AT&T

208 S. Akard Street, Dallas, 75202, US

Last Update: 14/08/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
http://www.att.com
100/1000Critical

We understand that our customers want an easier, less complicated life. We’re using our network, labs, products, services, and people to create a world where everything works together seamlessly, and life is better as a result. How will we continue to drive for thi...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:194,164
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
8
Known data breaches
27
Attack type number
4

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Vodafone Procure & Connect

Vodafone Procure & Connect

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
AT&T

AT&T

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Vodafone Procure & Connect in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

AT&T has 676.7% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Vodafone Procure & Connect (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Vodafone Procure & Connect cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - AT&T (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AT&T cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Vodafone Procure & Connect

Vodafone Procure & Connect

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
AT&T

AT&T

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
ATTIBM1781168591
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
OKTMICATTNVI1780611852
🔒 Incident : Breach
METORATICBANYAHATTADOAPPCOLGOO1777962591

FAQ

Between Vodafone Procure & Connect company and AT&T company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Vodafone Procure & Connect company and AT&T company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Vodafone Procure & Connect company and AT&T company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Vodafone Procure & Connect company and AT&T company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Vodafone Procure & Connect company and AT&T company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Vodafone Procure & Connect company and AT&T company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Vodafone Procure & Connect company and AT&T company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Vodafone Procure & Connect company and AT&T company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Vodafone Procure & Connect company and AT&T company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Vodafone Procure & Connect company and AT&T company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Vodafone Procure & Connect company and AT&T company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Vodafone Procure & Connect and AT&T, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Vodafone Procure & Connect and AT&T, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Vodafone Procure & Connect or AT&T ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Vodafone Procure & Connect or AT&T ?
Between Vodafone Procure & Connect and AT&T, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Vodafone Procure & Connect and AT&T, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-9693
SUMMARY

Mattermost versions 10.11.x <= 10.11.20, 11.7.x <= 11.7.5 Mattermost fails to remove thread membership records when a user is removed from or leaves a team, which allows a previously removed user who is later re-invited to the team to view private channel thread root post content and metadata via the team threads API.. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00682

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-75587
SUMMARY

Mattermost Desktop App versions <=6.2 6.2.2.0 fail to redact the pre-auth secret when generating a diagnostics report, which allows a local attacker with access to a user's diagnostics report or log files to obtain the plaintext pre-auth secret configured for a connected server via inspecting the Server Connectivity (Step-3) diagnostics output. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00716

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-75078
SUMMARY

A security flaw has been discovered in SourceCodester Class and Exam Timetabling System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /BSHRM1.php. Performing a manipulation of the argument course results in cross site scripting. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-67961
SUMMARY

An issue in O2OA v.10.0.2 allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary code via the the sandbox mechanism of the Invoke script execution.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-67919
SUMMARY

An issue in Halo 2.25.4 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the PluginEndpoint.java, installFromUri method, and DefaultPluginApplicationContextFactory components

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES