Comparison Overview
Vodafone Idea Limited

Vodafone Idea Limited
Vodafone Idea Limited, Mumbai, 400030, IN
Last Update: 05/09/2026
Vodafone Idea Limited is an Aditya Birla Group and Vodafone Group partnership. It is India’s leading telecom service provider. The Company provides pan India Voice and Data services across 2G, 3G and 4G platform. With the large spectrum portfolio to support the growing ...

Proximus Group
Boulevard du Roi Albert II 27, Brussels, 1030, BE
Last Update: 14/09/2026
Proximus Group is a provider of future-proof connectivity, IT and digital services, headquartered in Brussels. The Group is actively engaged in building a connected world that people trust, so society blooms. The Domestic segment is focused on providing state-of-the ar...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Vodafone Idea Limited







Proximus Group






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Vodafone Idea Limited in 2026.
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Proximus Group in 2026.
Incident History - Vodafone Idea Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Vodafone Idea Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Proximus Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Proximus Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Vodafone Idea Limited

Proximus Group
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.