Comparison Overview
Vodacom Business

Vodacom Business
Vodacom Boulevard, Johannesburg, 1685, ZA
Last Update: 23/03/2026
At Vodacom Business, we believe extraordinary doesn’t just happen - it’s built when businesses are empowered with the right tools, trusted partners, and bold ambition. Part of the Vodafone Group, Vodacom Business is committed to helping enterprises and organisations acr...

Accenture
Grand Canal Harbour, Dublin 2, IE
Last Update: 14/09/2026
Accenture helps the world’s leading enterprises reinvent by building their digital core and unleashing the power of AI to create value at speed for organizations across industries. Our strategy is to be the reinvention partner of choice for our clients and lead in the s...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Vodacom Business







Accenture






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Vodacom Business in 2026.
Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)
Accenture has 288.35% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Vodacom Business (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Vodacom Business cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Accenture (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Accenture cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Vodacom Business

Accenture
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
DocsGPT through 0.20.0 posts OAuth connector session tokens to a wildcard target origin in the callback-status endpoint without validating sender origin. Attackers can obtain session tokens and provider account emails by acting as window.opener during OAuth authorization, then use tokens to disconnect victims' cloud storage connectors.
- https://github.com/arc53/DocsGPT
- https://github.com/arc53/DocsGPT/blob/c36b0af17037449f34449efa97da82becfc9492d/docsgpt/api/connector/routes.py#L344-L366
- https://github.com/arc53/DocsGPT/blob/c36b0af17037449f34449efa97da82becfc9492d/docsgpt/api/connector/routes.py#L515-L527
- https://github.com/arc53/DocsGPT/blob/c36b0af17037449f34449efa97da82becfc9492d/frontend/src/components/ConnectorAuth.tsx#L57-L80
- https://github.com/arc53/DocsGPT/issues/2766
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/docsgpt-through-0.20.0-oauth-token-disclosure-via-wildcard-postmessage
DevSpace through 6.3.21 fails to reject parent-directory segments in tar entry names from the in-pod sync stream. Attackers operating a malicious container can stream tar entries with traversal sequences to write arbitrary files on the developer workstation, enabling code execution.
- https://github.com/devspace-sh/devspace
- https://github.com/devspace-sh/devspace/blob/7f272dcf90653fa9b42bc4347f7f3f9a52b0e8b5/pkg/devspace/sync/tar.go#L68-L82
- https://github.com/devspace-sh/devspace/blob/7f272dcf90653fa9b42bc4347f7f3f9a52b0e8b5/pkg/devspace/sync/util.go#L9-L11
- https://github.com/devspace-sh/devspace/issues/3290
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/devspace-through-6.3.21-path-traversal-via-tar-extraction
Refly through 1.1.0 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the POST /v1/misc/scrape endpoint that fetches caller-supplied URLs without validating the scheme, host, or resolved address. Authenticated attackers can make the backend issue requests to loopback, private, and link-local addresses including cloud metadata services to read page titles and descriptions of internal resources.
- https://github.com/refly-ai/refly
- https://github.com/refly-ai/refly/blob/77fb0ca184251bba7380cbac2dbdf7a6c9944652/apps/api/src/modules/misc/misc.controller.ts#L38-L43
- https://github.com/refly-ai/refly/blob/77fb0ca184251bba7380cbac2dbdf7a6c9944652/packages/utils/src/scrape-weblink.ts
- https://github.com/refly-ai/refly/issues/2280
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/refly-through-1.1.0-server-side-request-forgery-via-scrape-endpoint
GrowthBook through 5.0.1 returns unredacted fact table definitions including raw warehouse SQL in payloads served by unauthenticated public report and experiment endpoints. Attackers with knowledge of a publicly shared report or experiment identifier can read internal data warehouse query text, schema, table names, filter values and datasource identifiers.
- https://github.com/growthbook/growthbook
- https://github.com/growthbook/growthbook/blob/57d07471b137eb43d9bfb1613d0a1203d21fef88/packages/back-end/src/app.ts#L391-L409
- https://github.com/growthbook/growthbook/blob/57d07471b137eb43d9bfb1613d0a1203d21fef88/packages/back-end/src/services/reports.ts#L880-L890
- https://github.com/growthbook/growthbook/issues/6541
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/growthbook-through-5.0.1-information-disclosure-via-public-endpoints
Flowable flowable-engine through 8.0.0 contains an XML external entity injection vulnerability in ProcessDiagramLayoutFactory.parseXml() that fails to disable external entity resolution when parsing deployed BPMN resources. Attackers with process deployment privileges can embed DOCTYPE declarations with external entities in BPMN files to read arbitrary local files or trigger requests to internal network endpoints when diagram layout is computed.
- https://github.com/flowable/flowable-engine
- https://github.com/flowable/flowable-engine/blob/0779d68e5a3385b74d8acb8bc37901ff54513249/modules/flowable-engine/src/main/java/org/flowable/engine/impl/bpmn/diagram/ProcessDiagramLayoutFactory.java#L101-L118
- https://github.com/flowable/flowable-engine/blob/0779d68e5a3385b74d8acb8bc37901ff54513249/modules/flowable5-engine/src/main/java/org/activiti/engine/impl/bpmn/diagram/ProcessDiagramLayoutFactory.java#L97-L114
- https://github.com/flowable/flowable-engine/issues/4216
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/flowable-flowable-engine-through-8.0.0-xxe-via-processdiagramlayoutfactory