Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Vocera Communications, now part of StrykerVocera Communications, now part of Stryker
VS
Tata CommunicationsTata Communications
Vocera Communications, now part of Stryker

Vocera Communications, now part of Stryker

525 Race St, San Jose, 95126, US

Last Update: 25/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.vocera.com
755/1000Fair

On Feb. 23, 2022, Stryker Corporation completed the acquisition of Vocera Communications, a leader in digital care coordination and communication. Follow the Stryker Acute Care Linkedn page for the latest on Vocera Communications’ solutions. Founded in 2000, Vocera pr...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:300
Subsidiaries:41
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Tata Communications

Tata Communications

Tata Communications Ltd, Mumbai, 400070, IN

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.tatacommunications.com
768/1000Fair

Tata Communications is a digital ecosystem enabler that powers today’s fast-growing digital economy. We enable the digital transformation of enterprises globally, including 300 of the Fortune 500. We carry around 30% of the world’s internet routes and connects businesse...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:16,856
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Vocera Communications, now part of Stryker

Vocera Communications, now part of Stryker

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Tata Communications

Tata Communications

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Vocera Communications, now part of Stryker in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tata Communications in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Vocera Communications, now part of Stryker (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Vocera Communications, now part of Stryker cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Tata Communications (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tata Communications cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Vocera Communications, now part of Stryker

Vocera Communications, now part of Stryker

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Tata Communications

Tata Communications

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Vocera Communications, now part of Stryker company and Tata Communications company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Vocera Communications, now part of Stryker company and Tata Communications company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Vocera Communications, now part of Stryker company and Tata Communications company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Vocera Communications, now part of Stryker company and Tata Communications company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Vocera Communications, now part of Stryker company and Tata Communications company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Vocera Communications, now part of Stryker company and Tata Communications company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Vocera Communications, now part of Stryker company and Tata Communications company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Vocera Communications, now part of Stryker company and Tata Communications company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Vocera Communications, now part of Stryker company and Tata Communications company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Vocera Communications, now part of Stryker company and Tata Communications company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Vocera Communications, now part of Stryker company and Tata Communications company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Vocera Communications, now part of Stryker and Tata Communications, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Vocera Communications, now part of Stryker and Tata Communications, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Vocera Communications, now part of Stryker or Tata Communications ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Vocera Communications, now part of Stryker or Tata Communications ?
Between Vocera Communications, now part of Stryker and Tata Communications, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Vocera Communications, now part of Stryker and Tata Communications, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57100
SUMMARY

Server-side request forgery (ssrf) in Microsoft Entra Provisioning Service (SyncFabric) allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-02
UPDATED
Date2026-07-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.1
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-54998
SUMMARY

Incorrect authorization in Microsoft Exchange Online allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-02
UPDATED
Date2026-07-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-45499
SUMMARY

Server-side request forgery (ssrf) in Azure OpenAI allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-02
UPDATED
Date2026-07-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.1
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-41106
SUMMARY

Url redirection to untrusted site ('open redirect') in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-02
UPDATED
Date2026-07-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-26145
SUMMARY

Improper access control in Azure Synapse allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-02
UPDATED
Date2026-07-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.8
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2
REFERENCES