Comparison Overview
VIVO

VIVO
Avenida Luis Carlos Berrini, São Paulo, 04571-000 , BR
Last Update: 19/02/2026
Vivo é a marca comercial da Telefônica no Brasil, a maior operadora de telecomunicações do país. Conecte-se você também com a gente!

AT&T
208 S. Akard Street, Dallas, 75202, US
Last Update: 17/06/2026
We understand that our customers want an easier, less complicated life. We’re using our network, labs, products, services, and people to create a world where everything works together seamlessly, and life is better as a result. How will we continue to drive for thi...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

VIVO







AT&T






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for VIVO in 2026.
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
AT&T has 647.66% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - VIVO (X = Date, Y = Severity)
VIVO cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - AT&T (X = Date, Y = Severity)
AT&T cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

VIVO

AT&T
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.