Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

vivo Austriavivo Austria
VS
KPNKPN
vivo Austria

vivo Austria

Donau-City Straße 7., Vienna, 1220, AT

Last Update: 23/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.vivo.com/at/
754/1000Fair

vivo is a leading, product-driven, global technology company, with its core business focusing on smart devices and intelligent services. vivo is committed to connecting users around the globe, through design of exciting and innovative smartphones, as well as services wh...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:0
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
KPN

KPN

Wilhelminakade 123, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, NL, 3072 AP

Last Update: 07/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.kpn.com
792/1000Fair

Welkom bij de LinkedIn pagina van KPN. Sinds jaar en dag maakt KPN technologie toegankelijk. Hier leest u alles over de ontwikkelingen rondom de thema’s die KPN belangrijk vindt, zoals Het Nieuwe Leven & Werken, Veiligheid & Privacy en ICT-infrastructuur. Ook een transp...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:17,865
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
vivo Austria

vivo Austria

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
KPN

KPN

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for vivo Austria in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KPN in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - vivo Austria (X = Date, Y = Severity)

vivo Austria cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - KPN (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KPN cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
vivo Austria

vivo Austria

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
KPN

KPN

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between vivo Austria company and KPN company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between vivo Austria company and KPN company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between vivo Austria company and KPN company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between vivo Austria company and KPN company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between vivo Austria company and KPN company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between vivo Austria company and KPN company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between vivo Austria company and KPN company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between vivo Austria company and KPN company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between vivo Austria company and KPN company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between vivo Austria company and KPN company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between vivo Austria company and KPN company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between vivo Austria and KPN, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between vivo Austria and KPN, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - vivo Austria or KPN ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - vivo Austria or KPN ?
Between vivo Austria and KPN, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between vivo Austria and KPN, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-85893
SUMMARY

Use after free in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-69486
SUMMARY

Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2025-11395
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Podman. If an attacker can pass a crafted tar archive to the `podman load` command, they can create files on the host machine with the privileges of the user running Podman.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-92259
SUMMARY

Integer overflow or wraparound vulnerability in Samsung Opensource Escargot allows attackers with write access to the bytecode-cache directory to cause a heap-based buffer overflow and denial of service via a crafted cache file. This issue affects Escargot: ac94df78493ee6fede286620d94f724e46b4d238.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-92257
SUMMARY

Netcore NR255-V version 1.5.130703 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in L7 content management pages that use eval() sinks, affecting the call board text and policy group handling components. Attackers can inject persistent script payloads through these pages to have malicious code executed in the context of other users viewing the affected content.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3