Comparison Overview
Vivacom

Vivacom
Bulgaria, Sofia, 115I Tsarigradsko Shoose Blvd., Sofia, 1784, BG
Last Update: 10/03/2026
Digital telecom of a new generation with an extremely wide range of telecommunications solutions for residential and business customers, partners, and stakeholders – this is Vivacom. We offer mobile and fixed voice services, high speed mobile and broadband Internet, int...

Ericsson
Torshamnsgatan 21, Kista, Stockholm, SE
Last Update: 02/04/2026
The future of mobile isn’t on the horizon, it’s happening now. At Ericsson, we’re building the foundation for an open network ecosystem where industries, developers, and enterprises thrive. The convergence of 5G, AI, cloud, and network APIs isn’t just a technological s...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Vivacom







Ericsson






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Vivacom in 2026.
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
Ericsson has 191.26% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Vivacom (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Vivacom cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Ericsson (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Ericsson cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Vivacom

Ericsson
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
An issue in the SBN UDP interface of NASA cFS v7.0.1 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via transmitting a crafted SBN frame.
A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the cmd_edl function of OreSat Firmware v1.0. The vulnerability is triggered when processing the edl fw_flash command, where the <filename> argument is copied to a 64-byte stack buffer via memcpy without proper length validation. An attacker with physical access to the UART3 serial interface can exploit this vulnerability by sending a maliciously crafted command with an oversized filename parameter,
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Violation of Secure Design Principles vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated privileges. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.