Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

VitalAire Diabetes South AfricaVitalAire Diabetes South Africa
VS
Edwards LifesciencesEdwards Lifesciences
VitalAire Diabetes South Africa

VitalAire Diabetes South Africa

59 Roan Crescent, Midrand, Gauteng, 1685, ZA

Last Update: 07/12/2025

View Profile
757/1000Fair

To be a leading provider of innovative, superior healthcare solutions for people living with diabetes and the healthcare providers that support them. In July 2022, VitalAire South Africa acquired the diabetes division of Ethitech Health Innovation. VitalAire Diabetes...

NAICS:3391
NAICS Definition:Medical Equipment and Supplies Manufacturing
Employees:14
Subsidiaries:24
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Edwards Lifesciences

Edwards Lifesciences

One Edwards Way, Irvine, 92614, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.edwards.com
817/1000Good

Edwards Lifesciences (NYSE: EW), is the leading global structural heart innovation company, driven by a passion to improve patient lives. Through breakthrough technologies, world-class evidence and partnerships with clinicians and healthcare stakeholders, our employees ...

NAICS:3391
NAICS Definition:Medical Equipment and Supplies Manufacturing
Employees:13,672
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
VitalAire Diabetes South Africa

VitalAire Diabetes South Africa

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Edwards Lifesciences

Edwards Lifesciences

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Medical Equipment Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for VitalAire Diabetes South Africa in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Medical Equipment Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Edwards Lifesciences in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - VitalAire Diabetes South Africa (X = Date, Y = Severity)

VitalAire Diabetes South Africa cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Edwards Lifesciences (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Edwards Lifesciences cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
VitalAire Diabetes South Africa

VitalAire Diabetes South Africa

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Edwards Lifesciences

Edwards Lifesciences

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between VitalAire Diabetes South Africa company and Edwards Lifesciences company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between VitalAire Diabetes South Africa company and Edwards Lifesciences company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between VitalAire Diabetes South Africa company and Edwards Lifesciences company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between VitalAire Diabetes South Africa company and Edwards Lifesciences company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between VitalAire Diabetes South Africa company and Edwards Lifesciences company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between VitalAire Diabetes South Africa company and Edwards Lifesciences company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between VitalAire Diabetes South Africa company and Edwards Lifesciences company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between VitalAire Diabetes South Africa company and Edwards Lifesciences company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between VitalAire Diabetes South Africa company and Edwards Lifesciences company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between VitalAire Diabetes South Africa company and Edwards Lifesciences company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between VitalAire Diabetes South Africa company and Edwards Lifesciences company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between VitalAire Diabetes South Africa and Edwards Lifesciences, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between VitalAire Diabetes South Africa and Edwards Lifesciences, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - VitalAire Diabetes South Africa or Edwards Lifesciences ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - VitalAire Diabetes South Africa or Edwards Lifesciences ?
Between VitalAire Diabetes South Africa and Edwards Lifesciences, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between VitalAire Diabetes South Africa and Edwards Lifesciences, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1