Comparison Overview

VITAL WorkLife

VS

Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust (TEWV)

VITAL WorkLife

5000 W 36TH ST, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55416, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

VITAL WorkLife partners with healthcare organizations to measurably improve the mental health and well-being of their workforce. With an exclusive healthcare focus – and an experienced network of physician peer coaches and behavioral health consultants – we match clinicians and caregivers with tailored solutions to enhance well-being, career longevity and satisfaction.​ ​Our team understands the unique demands placed on healthcare professionals. From one-on-one peer coaching and physician intervention, to our employee assistance program (EAP) and physician well-being resources, every solution is designed with clinicians in mind. It’s why more than 90 health systems and 100,000 clinicians trust VITAL WorkLife as their go-to resource for mental health and well-being.​ ​With VITAL WorkLife, healthcare organizations benefit from:​ Healthcare focus. We specialize in addressing mental health challenges faced by healthcare professionals – and offer a range of tailored solutions to help them flourish. ​ +Personalized approach. Our team of experts takes a high-touch approach – looking beyond the surface to deliver holistic, person-centered care.​ +Improved access. We quickly match clinicians and caregivers with the right resources, reducing the time it takes to access mental health care.​ +Data-driven solutions. Through data analytics and reporting, we demonstrate tangible results to show the impact of your investment.​ +A trusted, strategic partner. Healthcare leadership teams across the U.S. leverage our deep experience to promote well-being within their organization and empower cultural change.​ With VITAL WorkLife as your ally, you can help remove the barriers and stigma associated with mental health struggles in healthcare. The result: Healthier, more engaged care teams that benefit us all.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 76
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust (TEWV)

West Park Hospital, Darlington, undefined, Dl2 2TS, GB
Last Update:
Between 750 and 799

We are the mental health and learning disability NHS Trust for County Durham and Darlington, Teesside, North Yorkshire, York and Selby. From education and prevention, to crisis and specialist care - our talented and compassionate teams work in partnership with our patients, communities and partners to help the people of our region feel safe, understood, believed in and cared for. We nurture the recovery journey of anyone in need of our help. In Our Trust, everyone has a say in how they are supported and treated because we listen to every person in our care until they feel understood. Our patients, their families and carers work together with us towards better mental health. We’re committed to new thinking that improves the wellbeing of our region. We connect with our communities and partners to get mental health care right, in areas that really need it. We won’t rest until everyone in our region has the mental health care they need, to lead their best possible life. Find out more about us on our website. You can also follow us on Twitter or Facebook for regular Trust news. www.facebook.com/tewv.ft www.twitter.com/TEWV

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 2,277
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vital_worklife.jpeg
VITAL WorkLife
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tees-esk-&-wear-valleys-nhs-foundation-trust.jpeg
Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust (TEWV)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
VITAL WorkLife
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust (TEWV)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for VITAL WorkLife in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust (TEWV) in 2026.

Incident History — VITAL WorkLife (X = Date, Y = Severity)

VITAL WorkLife cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust (TEWV) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust (TEWV) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vital_worklife.jpeg
VITAL WorkLife
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tees-esk-&-wear-valleys-nhs-foundation-trust.jpeg
Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust (TEWV)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust (TEWV) company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to VITAL WorkLife company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust (TEWV) company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to VITAL WorkLife company.

In the current year, Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust (TEWV) company and VITAL WorkLife company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust (TEWV) company nor VITAL WorkLife company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust (TEWV) company nor VITAL WorkLife company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust (TEWV) company nor VITAL WorkLife company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither VITAL WorkLife company nor Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust (TEWV) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither VITAL WorkLife nor Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust (TEWV) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust (TEWV) company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to VITAL WorkLife company.

Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust (TEWV) company employs more people globally than VITAL WorkLife company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither VITAL WorkLife nor Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust (TEWV) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither VITAL WorkLife nor Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust (TEWV) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither VITAL WorkLife nor Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust (TEWV) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither VITAL WorkLife nor Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust (TEWV) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither VITAL WorkLife nor Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust (TEWV) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither VITAL WorkLife nor Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust (TEWV) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N