Comparison Overview
Visilab

Visilab
CH
Last Update: 04/04/2026
Créée en 1988, Visilab est une entreprise suisse qui dispose à ce jour du plus grand réseau d'opticiens, plus de 75 magasins répartis en Suisse romande et alémanique. À l'origine, outre l'exemplarité des services fournis par Visilab, sa spécificité est d'avoir été les p...

SPAR International
Rokin 99, Amsterdam, 1012KM, NL
Last Update: 01/04/2026
The worldwide SPAR organisation operates over 13,800 SPAR stores in 48 countries on four continents, meeting the needs of over 14,7 million consumers every day. The SPAR concept was established on the basis of wholesalers and retailers working in partnership to the be...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Visilab







SPAR International






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Visilab in 2026.
Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for SPAR International in 2026.
Incident History - Visilab (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Visilab cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - SPAR International (X = Date, Y = Severity)
SPAR International cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Visilab

SPAR International
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.