Comparison Overview
Virtus Energy

Virtus Energy
undefined, London, undefined, undefined, GB
Last Update: 28/02/2026
Virtus Energy is focused on accelerating the adoption and infrastructure growth of sustainable transport technologies and clean power generation. We are passionate about increasing Electric Vehicle (EV) charging infrastructure across the UK, and our objective is to bec...

HARMAN International
400 Atlantic St, Stamford, 06901, US
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Headquartered in Stamford, Connecticut, HARMAN (harman.com) designs and engineers connected products and solutions for automakers, consumers, and enterprises worldwide, including connected car systems, audio and visual products, enterprise automation solutions; and serv...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Virtus Energy







HARMAN International






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Computers and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Virtus Energy in 2026.
Incidents vs Computers and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for HARMAN International in 2026.
Incident History - Virtus Energy (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Virtus Energy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - HARMAN International (X = Date, Y = Severity)
HARMAN International cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Virtus Energy

HARMAN International
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.