Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

VCU AlumniVCU Alumni
VS
University of OklahomaUniversity of Oklahoma
VCU Alumni

VCU Alumni

111 N 4th St, Richmond, 23219, US

Last Update: 11/01/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.vcualumni.org/
771/1000Fair

As a graduate, you are a member of a thriving community of more than 200,000 alumni throughout the world who engage with their communities and their alma mater to build on the strong foundation established by our past and present alumni organizations and leaders. We kn...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
University of Oklahoma

University of Oklahoma

660 N Parrington Oval, Norman, Oklahoma, US, 73019

Last Update: 07/05/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://ou.edu
727/1000Moderate

Attracting top students from across the nation and more than 100 countries around the world, OU provides a major university experience in a private college atmosphere. In fact, OU is number one in the nation in the number of National Merit Scholars enrolled at a public...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:11,504
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
VCU Alumni

VCU Alumni

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
University of Oklahoma

University of Oklahoma

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for VCU Alumni in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

University of Oklahoma has 3.85% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - VCU Alumni (X = Date, Y = Severity)

VCU Alumni cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - University of Oklahoma (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Oklahoma cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
VCU Alumni

VCU Alumni

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
University of Oklahoma

University of Oklahoma

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
UNIINS1778196407
🔒 Incident : Breach
UNI53201022

FAQ

Between VCU Alumni company and University of Oklahoma company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between VCU Alumni company and University of Oklahoma company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between VCU Alumni company and University of Oklahoma company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between VCU Alumni company and University of Oklahoma company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between VCU Alumni company and University of Oklahoma company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between VCU Alumni company and University of Oklahoma company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between VCU Alumni company and University of Oklahoma company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between VCU Alumni company and University of Oklahoma company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between VCU Alumni company and University of Oklahoma company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between VCU Alumni company and University of Oklahoma company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between VCU Alumni company and University of Oklahoma company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between VCU Alumni and University of Oklahoma, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between VCU Alumni and University of Oklahoma, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - VCU Alumni or University of Oklahoma ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - VCU Alumni or University of Oklahoma ?
Between VCU Alumni and University of Oklahoma, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between VCU Alumni and University of Oklahoma, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1