Comparison Overview
Virgin Australia
Virgin Australia
275 Grey St, South Brisbane, 4101, AU
Last Update: 04/04/2026
We're on a mission to make flying better than 'nice'. Because why should you settle for a 'nice' flight, when you can have a wonderful one? To help make our mission possible, we've brought on 2000 new team members, including 1440 in airports and in the air. We've restr...
LATAM Airlines
Avenida Presidente Riesco 5711, Edificio Huidobro, Las Condes, Región Metropolitana de Santiago, CL, 7561114
Last Update: 12/10/2026
We are the leading airline in South America with the largest destinations, frequencies and aircraft fleet offer. We have the largest network of domestic destinations in five South American markets: Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador and Peru, and international operations...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Virgin Australia
LATAM Airlines
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Virgin Australia in 2026.
Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for LATAM Airlines in 2026.
Incident History - Virgin Australia (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Virgin Australia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - LATAM Airlines (X = Date, Y = Severity)
LATAM Airlines cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Virgin Australia
LATAM Airlines
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.