Comparison Overview
Virgin Atlantic

Virgin Atlantic
The VHQ, Fleming Way, Crawley, None, GB, RH10 9DF
Last Update: 10/03/2026
Virgin Atlantic first took to the skies in 1984 to shake things up, bringing a sparkle of red, a touch of wit and a passion for flying to the grey world of airlines. We fell in love with creating the best experience in the skies for our customers, and they fell in love ...

IndiGo (InterGlobe Aviation Ltd)
Level 1, Tower C, Global Business Park,, Gurgaon, 122 002, IN
Last Update: 12/06/2026
IndiGo is India’s largest passenger airline. We operate with focus on our three pillars – offering low fares, being on-time and delivering a courteous and hassle-free experience. IndiGo has become synonymous with being on-time. Since our inception in August 2006, we ha...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Virgin Atlantic







IndiGo (InterGlobe Aviation Ltd)






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Virgin Atlantic in 2026.
Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for IndiGo (InterGlobe Aviation Ltd) in 2026.
Incident History - Virgin Atlantic (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Virgin Atlantic cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - IndiGo (InterGlobe Aviation Ltd) (X = Date, Y = Severity)
IndiGo (InterGlobe Aviation Ltd) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Virgin Atlantic

IndiGo (InterGlobe Aviation Ltd)
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
phpMyFAQ before 4.1.5 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability in GroupController::updatePermissions that allows GROUP_EDIT administrators to grant arbitrary rights to groups without verifying they hold those rights themselves. A delegated administrator can exploit this by assigning high-value permissions to a group they belong to, inheriting those rights and escalating privileges up to full administrative control.
n8n before 2.25.7 and 2.26.x before 2.26.2 contains an abstract syntax tree (AST) security validator bypass in the Python Code node. An authenticated user with permission to create or modify workflows containing a Python Code node can bypass the validator and access the task executor module namespace. The issue only affects self-hosted instances where the Python Task Runner is enabled; where N8N_BLOCK_RUNNER_ENV_ACCESS is configured to allow it, this can disclose environment variables accessible to the task runner process.
Grav CMS before 2.0.0-beta.2 contains multiple code-execution vulnerabilities. Three unsafe unserialize() calls - in Scheduler\JobQueue, Framework\Cache\Adapter\FileCache, and Session - deserialize untrusted data without restricting allowed classes, enabling PHP object injection and, via a gadget chain, arbitrary code execution where an attacker controls the serialized input. Additionally, InstallCommand's git clone operation passes the branch, url, and path parameters into a shell command without escaping, allowing OS command injection via plugin/theme installation (which requires admin access). A Twig security blocklist bypass (server-side template injection) is also present. The issues are fixed in 2.0.0-beta.2.
Storage Concentrator (SC & SCVM) contains a command injection vulnerability within the debug.pl script that is reachable without authentication. A remote attacker can submit a specially crafted HTTP request containing a malicious payload that is processed without adequate input sanitization, resulting in arbitrary command execution with root-level privileges on the underlying system.
Storage Concentrator (SC & SCVM) contains a command injection vulnerability in the ms_service.pl service, which listens on TCP port 9000 by default and accepts custom network packets to perform device actions. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send a specially crafted packet containing a malicious payload that is processed without adequate sanitization, resulting in arbitrary command execution with root-level privileges.