Comparison Overview
Virgin Active

Virgin Active
26 Little Trinity Lane, London, EC4V2AR, GB
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Virgin Active is a globally recognised exercise brand with over 230 clubs in 8 countries and more than 1.2 million members. As part of the Virgin Group founded by Sir Richard Branson, Virgin Active disrupted the UK fitness industry in 1999 by creating large health clu...

Herbalife
800 W Olympic Blvd, Los Angeles, CA, US, 90015
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Herbalife is a global health and wellness community born to support you in living your best life. For over 40 years and in more than 90 countries, we’ve empowered millions of people to make real changes to their lives with our science-backed products, the support of a c...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Virgin Active







Herbalife






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Wellness and Fitness Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Virgin Active in 2026.
Incidents vs Wellness and Fitness Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Herbalife in 2026.
Incident History - Virgin Active (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Virgin Active cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Herbalife (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Herbalife cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Virgin Active

Herbalife
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.