Comparison Overview
Virgin Active

Virgin Active
26 Little Trinity Lane, London, EC4V2AR, GB
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Virgin Active is a globally recognised exercise brand with over 230 clubs in 8 countries and more than 1.2 million members. As part of the Virgin Group founded by Sir Richard Branson, Virgin Active disrupted the UK fitness industry in 1999 by creating large health clu...

Forever Living Products (UK) Ltd
GB
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Forever Living Products and its affiliates are the largest growers, manufacturer and distributors of Aloe Vera products. The key to Forever Living's success is commitment to quality and purity. In order to ensure the highest quality, Forever Living cultivates aloe vera ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Virgin Active







Forever Living Products (UK) Ltd






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Wellness and Fitness Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Virgin Active in 2026.
Incidents vs Wellness and Fitness Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Forever Living Products (UK) Ltd in 2026.
Incident History - Virgin Active (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Virgin Active cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Forever Living Products (UK) Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Forever Living Products (UK) Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Virgin Active

Forever Living Products (UK) Ltd
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.
Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.
A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.
Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.