Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Virgin ActiveVirgin Active
VS
Forever Living Products (UK) LtdForever Living Products (UK) Ltd
Virgin Active

Virgin Active

26 Little Trinity Lane, London, EC4V2AR, GB

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
769/1000Fair

Virgin Active is a globally recognised exercise brand with over 230 clubs in 8 countries and more than 1.2 million members. As part of the Virgin Group founded by Sir Richard Branson, Virgin Active disrupted the UK fitness industry in 1999 by creating large health clu...

NAICS:71394
NAICS Definition:Fitness and Recreational Sports Centers
Employees:7,638
Subsidiaries:15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Forever Living Products (UK) Ltd

Forever Living Products (UK) Ltd

GB

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 850 and 899
http://foreverliving.com/
856/1000Very Good

Forever Living Products and its affiliates are the largest growers, manufacturer and distributors of Aloe Vera products. The key to Forever Living's success is commitment to quality and purity. In order to ensure the highest quality, Forever Living cultivates aloe vera ...

NAICS:71394
NAICS Definition:Fitness and Recreational Sports Centers
Employees:31,285
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Virgin Active

Virgin Active

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Forever Living Products (UK) Ltd

Forever Living Products (UK) Ltd

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Wellness and Fitness Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Virgin Active in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Wellness and Fitness Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Forever Living Products (UK) Ltd in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Virgin Active (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Virgin Active cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Forever Living Products (UK) Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Forever Living Products (UK) Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Virgin Active

Virgin Active

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
VIR2253281222
Forever Living Products (UK) Ltd

Forever Living Products (UK) Ltd

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Virgin Active company and Forever Living Products (UK) Ltd company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Virgin Active company and Forever Living Products (UK) Ltd company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Virgin Active company and Forever Living Products (UK) Ltd company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Virgin Active company and Forever Living Products (UK) Ltd company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Virgin Active company and Forever Living Products (UK) Ltd company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Virgin Active company and Forever Living Products (UK) Ltd company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Virgin Active company and Forever Living Products (UK) Ltd company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Virgin Active company and Forever Living Products (UK) Ltd company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Virgin Active company and Forever Living Products (UK) Ltd company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Virgin Active company and Forever Living Products (UK) Ltd company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Virgin Active company and Forever Living Products (UK) Ltd company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Virgin Active and Forever Living Products (UK) Ltd, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Virgin Active and Forever Living Products (UK) Ltd, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Virgin Active or Forever Living Products (UK) Ltd ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Virgin Active or Forever Living Products (UK) Ltd ?
Between Virgin Active and Forever Living Products (UK) Ltd, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Virgin Active and Forever Living Products (UK) Ltd, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97032
SUMMARY

HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97031
SUMMARY

Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97030
SUMMARY

A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96207
SUMMARY

Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94510
SUMMARY

Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
5.3
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9