Comparison Overview
Vipond Fire Protection

Vipond Fire Protection
10/12 Glenfield Road, Kelvin Industrial Estate, East Kilbride, Glasgow, GB, G75 0PX
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Vipond Fire Protection specialises in designing, installing, servicing, and maintaining state-of-the-art fire suppression solutions for customers throughout the UK and Ireland. Our solutions include advanced sprinkler systems, gas suppression, kitchen fire suppression,...

VINCI Construction
5 Cours Ferdinand de Lesseps, Rueil-Malmaison, 92500, FR
Last Update: 08/09/2026
Premier groupe français et acteur mondial de premier plan de la construction, VINCI Construction réunit plus de 830 entreprises et près de 69000 collaborateurs dans une centaine de pays. Ses expertises s’étendent à l’ensemble des métiers du bâtiment, du génie civil, et ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Vipond Fire Protection







VINCI Construction






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Vipond Fire Protection in 2026.
Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for VINCI Construction in 2026.
Incident History - Vipond Fire Protection (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Vipond Fire Protection cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - VINCI Construction (X = Date, Y = Severity)
VINCI Construction cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Vipond Fire Protection

VINCI Construction
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
OpenStack Ironic through 38.0.0 may send a username and password to an unexpected remote host when Image Service is configured for HTTP(S) Basic Authentication.
An issue was discovered in OpenStack Keystone before 29.0.3. Tokens obtained via delegated authentication methods (EC2 credentials, application credentials, OAuth1 access tokens, and trusts) are not blocked from creating, modifying, or deleting credentials via the /v3/credentials API. EC2-derived tokens can additionally read credential blobs, exposing TOTP MFA seeds and other secrets. Also, PATCH /v3/credentials does not validate the requested post-update project_id, allowing any delegated token to move a credential to an unauthorized project. All Keystone deployments using delegated authentication are affected.
The administrative password is hashed using a comparatively weak, fast algorithm for the credential store backing one authentication path, and the file containing that hash is written with permissions allowing it to be read by any local user. This is inconsistent with a separate, stronger hashing algorithm used for the same password on another authentication path. A party able to read this file, including a local user or a party with access to a configuration backup, could feasibly recover the underlying password through offline computation, compromising the administrative credential across every path that accepts it.
An example environment-configuration file for a bundled inventory-management component ships with a fixed, publicly-known administrative password. A deployment that copies this example file into active configuration without running the setup routine that regenerates credentials will expose that component's administrative interface to anyone aware of the default value.
A prior update that raised a bundled HTTP client library to a version remediating known vulnerabilities was later reverted, reintroducing the earlier, vulnerable version into a log-processing component. The only code path in that component using the library issues a request to a single fixed, trusted vendor URL at initialization and does not process attacker-controlled input through the library, limiting practical exploitability of the reintroduced version in this context.