Comparison Overview
VINH PHUC PHARMACEUTICAL JOINT - STOCK COMPANY

VINH PHUC PHARMACEUTICAL JOINT - STOCK COMPANY
VN
Last Update: 06/05/2026
With motto "for public health", the medical ethics of the physician in who produce as well as in business to defend the interest people the client Everlasting Lucky materia medica joint stock company (have VINPHACO business name) always exaltted is motto what VINPHACO ...

Novo Nordisk
Novo Alle, Bagsværd, DK, 2880
Last Update: 20/06/2026
We’re not your typical healthcare company. In a modern world of quick fixes, we focus on solutions to defeat serious chronic disease and create long-term health. Our unordinary mindset is at the heart of everything we do. We seek out new ideas and put people first as we...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

VINH PHUC PHARMACEUTICAL JOINT - STOCK COMPANY







Novo Nordisk






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for VINH PHUC PHARMACEUTICAL JOINT - STOCK COMPANY in 2026.
Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
Novo Nordisk has 183.02% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - VINH PHUC PHARMACEUTICAL JOINT - STOCK COMPANY (X = Date, Y = Severity)
VINH PHUC PHARMACEUTICAL JOINT - STOCK COMPANY cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Novo Nordisk (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Novo Nordisk cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

VINH PHUC PHARMACEUTICAL JOINT - STOCK COMPANY

Novo Nordisk
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Deserialization of untrusted data in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.
The Bluetooth BAP Broadcast Assistant GATT client in subsys/bluetooth/audio/bap_broadcast_assistant.c reassembled remote Broadcast Receive State data into a single file-static net_buf_simple (att_buf, BT_ATT_MAX_ATTRIBUTE_LEN = 512 bytes) shared by all connection instances, while the BUSY flag, long-read handle, and reset/offset state were per-connection. When the device acts as a Broadcast Assistant connected to multiple Scan Delegator peripherals, notification and long-read callbacks from different connections interleave on the shared buffer: the append in notify_handler (net_buf_simple_add_mem at the not-busy branch) performs no tailroom check, so receive-state notifications from two or more delegators accumulate on the same 512-byte buffer and, with a sufficiently large configured ATT MTU (BT_L2CAP_TX_MTU up to 2000) and two-to-three concurrent connections, write past the buffer into adjacent .bss (net_buf_simple_add only asserts in debug builds). Even below the overflow threshold, one connection's net_buf_simple_reset zeroes the shared length while another connection's reassembly and GATT read offset are in flight, mixing one peer's data into another's parse. A malicious or compromised Scan Delegator (or two colluding peers) over BLE can trigger this, causing out-of-bounds writes (memory corruption / denial of service) and cross-connection data corruption. The fix moves the buffer into the per-connection instance struct so each connection reassembles into its own buffer. Affects Zephyr releases shipping the Broadcast Assistant with the shared buffer, including v4.4.0 and earlier.
ImageMagick before 7.1.2-26 contains a memory leak vulnerability in the VIFF encoder when memory allocation fails. Attackers can trigger allocation failures by processing specially crafted VIFF images to exhaust available memory and cause denial of service.
ImageMagick before 7.1.2-26 contains a use-after-free vulnerability in the FormatMagickCaption method when memory allocation fails. Attackers can trigger memory allocation failures to cause a dangling pointer to reference freed memory, potentially enabling denial of service or code execution.
ImageMagick before 7.1.2-26 contains a policy bypass vulnerability in the APNG encoder and external delegates due to missing validation checks. Attackers can write files to disallowed paths by bypassing configured policy restrictions through the APNG encoding process.