Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

VINCI Construction Grands ProjetsVINCI Construction Grands Projets
VS
Kier GroupKier Group
VINCI Construction Grands Projets

VINCI Construction Grands Projets

1973, Boulevard de la Défense, Nanterre, Île-de-France, 92000, FR

Last Update: 06/12/2025

View Profile
766/1000Fair

Driven by its ambition to design major infrastructure of the future, VINCI Construction Grands Projets capitalises on its expertise and performance culture to design and build highly complex civil engineering structures worldwide, particularly in the following sectors: ...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:2,382
Subsidiaries:101
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Kier Group

Kier Group

Cavendish Place, UK, GB

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.kier.co.uk
755/1000Fair

Our purpose is to sustainably deliver infrastructure which is vital to the UK. As a leading provider of infrastructure services, construction and property developments, we are committed to delivering for communities and leaving lasting legacies through our work. We are...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:10,990
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
VINCI Construction Grands Projets

VINCI Construction Grands Projets

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Kier Group

Kier Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for VINCI Construction Grands Projets in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kier Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - VINCI Construction Grands Projets (X = Date, Y = Severity)

VINCI Construction Grands Projets cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Kier Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kier Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
VINCI Construction Grands Projets

VINCI Construction Grands Projets

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Kier Group

Kier Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between VINCI Construction Grands Projets company and Kier Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between VINCI Construction Grands Projets company and Kier Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between VINCI Construction Grands Projets company and Kier Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between VINCI Construction Grands Projets company and Kier Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between VINCI Construction Grands Projets company and Kier Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between VINCI Construction Grands Projets company and Kier Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between VINCI Construction Grands Projets company and Kier Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between VINCI Construction Grands Projets company and Kier Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between VINCI Construction Grands Projets company and Kier Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between VINCI Construction Grands Projets company and Kier Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between VINCI Construction Grands Projets company and Kier Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between VINCI Construction Grands Projets and Kier Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between VINCI Construction Grands Projets and Kier Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - VINCI Construction Grands Projets or Kier Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - VINCI Construction Grands Projets or Kier Group ?
Between VINCI Construction Grands Projets and Kier Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between VINCI Construction Grands Projets and Kier Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9