Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

VINCI Construction Grands ProjetsVINCI Construction Grands Projets
VS
Andrade Gutierrez S.A.Andrade Gutierrez S.A.
VINCI Construction Grands Projets

VINCI Construction Grands Projets

1973, Boulevard de la Défense, Nanterre, Île-de-France, 92000, FR

Last Update: 06/12/2025

View Profile
766/1000Fair

Driven by its ambition to design major infrastructure of the future, VINCI Construction Grands Projets capitalises on its expertise and performance culture to design and build highly complex civil engineering structures worldwide, particularly in the following sectors: ...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:2,382
Subsidiaries:101
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Andrade Gutierrez S.A.

Andrade Gutierrez S.A.

Avª das Nações Unidas 12495, São Paulo, 04578-000, BR

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
791/1000Fair

Fundada em Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, a Andrade Gutierrez tem reconhecida expertise no segmento de construção pesada. Na década de 1990 iniciou a diversificação dos negócios com investimentos nas áreas de Concessões e Telecomunicações. Hoje o Grupo Andrade Gutier...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:11,448
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
VINCI Construction Grands Projets

VINCI Construction Grands Projets

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Andrade Gutierrez S.A.

Andrade Gutierrez S.A.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for VINCI Construction Grands Projets in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Andrade Gutierrez S.A. in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - VINCI Construction Grands Projets (X = Date, Y = Severity)

VINCI Construction Grands Projets cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Andrade Gutierrez S.A. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Andrade Gutierrez S.A. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
VINCI Construction Grands Projets

VINCI Construction Grands Projets

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Andrade Gutierrez S.A.

Andrade Gutierrez S.A.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between VINCI Construction Grands Projets company and Andrade Gutierrez S.A. company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between VINCI Construction Grands Projets company and Andrade Gutierrez S.A. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between VINCI Construction Grands Projets company and Andrade Gutierrez S.A. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between VINCI Construction Grands Projets company and Andrade Gutierrez S.A. company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between VINCI Construction Grands Projets company and Andrade Gutierrez S.A. company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between VINCI Construction Grands Projets company and Andrade Gutierrez S.A. company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between VINCI Construction Grands Projets company and Andrade Gutierrez S.A. company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between VINCI Construction Grands Projets company and Andrade Gutierrez S.A. company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between VINCI Construction Grands Projets company and Andrade Gutierrez S.A. company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between VINCI Construction Grands Projets company and Andrade Gutierrez S.A. company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between VINCI Construction Grands Projets company and Andrade Gutierrez S.A. company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between VINCI Construction Grands Projets and Andrade Gutierrez S.A., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between VINCI Construction Grands Projets and Andrade Gutierrez S.A., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - VINCI Construction Grands Projets or Andrade Gutierrez S.A. ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - VINCI Construction Grands Projets or Andrade Gutierrez S.A. ?
Between VINCI Construction Grands Projets and Andrade Gutierrez S.A., which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between VINCI Construction Grands Projets and Andrade Gutierrez S.A., which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-71194
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Designate before 22.0.2, the mDNS handler performs pool-blind lookups when resolving record queries and NOTIFY requests. When two zones with the same name exist across different pools, the lookup fails with a deterministic error, causing the handler to return REFUSED for all DNS queries through that path. The _handle_notify path is exploitable via a single unauthenticated UDP packet. This is independently reachable through the cross-tenant zone overlap described in a different recent CVE, and also affects legitimate same-tenant cross-pool configurations. BIND9 views do not mitigate this issue as mDNS is a shared service upstream of any view configuration.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-71193
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Designate before 22.0.1, zone creation checks (_is_subzone, _is_superzone, and the duplicate-zone DB constraint) are scoped to the target pool only. An authenticated user can bypass these checks by scheduling a zone to a different pool via the AttributeFilter scheduler, creating an overlapping zone that conflicts with another tenant's zone. This enables cross-tenant DNS hijack (redirecting traffic to attacker-controlled IPs) and DNS denial of service (NODATA responses). Exploitation requires a multi-pool deployment with AttributeFilter enabled in scheduler_filters, which is a non-default but documented and supported configuration for self-service tiering.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.1
CVE-2026-49481
SUMMARY

UpSnap is a wake on lan web app. Versions prior to 5.4.0 have an OS command injection vulnerability in the UpSnap’s device management functionality due to the presence of unsafe shell command template interpolation using the ip and the mac fields. User-controlled values can be inserted into the wake_cmd and shutdown_cmd templates and executed via /bin/sh -c (Linux) or cmd /C (Windows) without sanitization, resulting in an authenticated Remote Code Execution (RCE). A low-privileged user with permission to create or edit devices can execute arbitrary operating system commands on the UpSnap hosted server. Version 5.4.0 patches the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.1
CVE-2026-47718
SUMMARY

FUXA is a web-based Process Visualization (SCADA/HMI/Dashboard) software. When `secureEnabled=true`, FUXA `1.3.0-2773` still allows guest and invalid-token requests to read project, alarms, and scheduler APIs. Version 1.3.1 fixes this issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-47717
SUMMARY

FUXA is a web-based Process Visualization (SCADA/HMI/Dashboard) software. In fuxa-server version 1.3.0, the GET /api/project endpoint exposes sensitive project configuration data to guest-context requests even when secureEnabled is enabled. Version 1.3.1 fixes the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9