Comparison Overview

VINCI Airports

VS

American Airlines

VINCI Airports

1973, Boulevard de la Défense, Nanterre, Île-de-France, FR, 92000
Last Update: 2025-11-20

As the world’s leading private airport operator, VINCI Airports operates +70 airports in 14 countries. Drawing on its expertise as a comprehensive integrator, VINCI Airports develops, finances, builds and operates airports, leveraging its investment capability and know-how to optimise the operational performance and modernisation of its infrastructure as well as bring about their environmental transition. In 2016, VINCI Airports became the first airport operator to commit to an international environmental strategy, setting itself the aim of reaching zero net emissions (scopes 1&2) across the network by 2050. In the same time, VINCI Airports is committed to contributing beyond its activities by helping stakeholders (transporters, passengers and more) reduce their own carbon footprint; and supporting regions in their climate transition. Premier opérateur aéroportuaire privé au monde, VINCI Airports opère plus de 70 aéroports dans 14 pays. Grâce à son expertise d’intégrateur global, VINCI Airports développe, finance, construit et gère les aéroports en apportant sa capacité d’investissement et son savoir-faire dans l’optimisation de la performance opérationnelle, la modernisation des infrastructures et la conduite de leur transition environnementale. VINCI Airports est le premier opérateur aéroportuaire à s’être engagé dans une stratégie environnementale internationale en 2016, pour atteindre l’objectif de « zéro émission » (scopes 1&2) nette sur l’ensemble de son réseau d’ici à 2050. En parallèle, VINCI Airports est engagé à contribuer, au-delà de son périmètre, à la réduction de l’empreinte carbone de ses parties prenantes (transporteurs, passagers …) ; et à accompagner la transition climatique des territoires.

NAICS: 481
NAICS Definition: Air Transportation
Employees: 781
Subsidiaries: 51
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

American Airlines

Dallas-Fort Worth, Texas, US
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 600 and 649

Embark on an adventure with a commitment to service, excellence and humanity. Our team is what powers our airline. We are proudly dedicated to our purpose of caring for people on life’s journey, including connecting our customers to the people and places they love or providing our team members development and leadership opportunities to acquire new skills and explore their potential. With more than 1,300 aircraft in our mainline and regional fleets combined and an extensive route network that touches six continents, we’ve got a place for you to start — or continue — your career. Whether you’re stationed at one of our hundreds of airports, working out of our state-of-the-art headquarters in Fort Worth, Texas, or serving customers over the phone from your home office, there are endless opportunities for you to grow and lead at American.

NAICS: 481
NAICS Definition: Air Transportation
Employees: 57,213
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
5
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vinci-airports.jpeg
VINCI Airports
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/american-airlines.jpeg
American Airlines
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
VINCI Airports
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
American Airlines
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for VINCI Airports in 2025.

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Average (This Year)

American Airlines has 122.22% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — VINCI Airports (X = Date, Y = Severity)

VINCI Airports cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — American Airlines (X = Date, Y = Severity)

American Airlines cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vinci-airports.jpeg
VINCI Airports
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2023
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: phishing, exploiting vulnerabilities, supply chain compromises, third-party breaches, cookie hijacking
Motivation: financial gain, operational disruption, geopolitical influence, strategic hybrid warfare
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/american-airlines.jpeg
American Airlines
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 4/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: External System Hacking
Blog: Blog

FAQ

VINCI Airports company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to American Airlines company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

American Airlines company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to VINCI Airports company.

In the current year, American Airlines company has reported more cyber incidents than VINCI Airports company.

VINCI Airports company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while American Airlines company has not reported such incidents publicly.

American Airlines company has disclosed at least one data breach, while VINCI Airports company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither American Airlines company nor VINCI Airports company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither VINCI Airports company nor American Airlines company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither VINCI Airports nor American Airlines holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

VINCI Airports company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to American Airlines company.

American Airlines company employs more people globally than VINCI Airports company, reflecting its scale as a Airlines and Aviation.

Neither VINCI Airports nor American Airlines holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither VINCI Airports nor American Airlines holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither VINCI Airports nor American Airlines holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither VINCI Airports nor American Airlines holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither VINCI Airports nor American Airlines holds HIPAA certification.

Neither VINCI Airports nor American Airlines holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H